International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Central Revenue rules on the business contribution of a PE in Italy

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-hager.png
The case has corporate income tax, VAT and registration tax implications

Gian Luca Nieddu and Barbara Scampuddu of Hager & Partners outline the corporate income tax, VAT and registration tax implications of the Central Revenue’s decision.

The contribution of the entire business of an EU company’s Italian permanent establishment (PE) to another EU company’s Italian PE is tax neutral under section 176 of Italian Tax Code (TUIR). This is the conclusion reached by the Central Revenue, as an answer to the request for advance ruling No. 633 as of December 31 2020.

Circumstances of the case

The case concerned an EU company (hereinafter ALFA) which intended to transfer its PE in Italy (hereinafter ALFA Italy PE) to the BETA company resident in another country of the EU, against of the issue of shares by BETA.

In particular, all active and passive assets of ALFA Italy PE were to flow entirely into a new PE, also in Italy, of the conferring subject, BETA.

Subsequently, the transferring company ALFA would carry out the distribution of profits in kind (corresponding to the investment in BETA, received against the aforementioned business contribution) in favour of its parent company GAMMA.

Accordingly, the Italian PE of ALFA would be transferred to BETA, and ALFA group will continue the activity in Italy, as well as in the other member states, where similar operations will be carried out.

Opinion of the Central Revenue

The Central Revenue expressed its opinion on the case considering the tax treatment in terms of corporate income tax (IRES), VAT and registration tax.

IRES

The contribution of the entire business of an EU company’s Italian PE to another EU company’s Italian PE is tax neutral under section 176 of Italian Tax Code (TUIR). However, if the shareholding acquired as a result of the contribution:

  • Is assigned to the ‘contributing’ PE and then transferred to its parent company; or

  • Is assigned directly (upon contribution) to the parent company; or

  • Is not functionally connected with the PE; or

  • the capital gain, if any, realised by the ‘contributing’ PE is taxable, possibly under the PEX regime if the conditions are met (Italian tax authority, answer to request for advance ruling No. 633 as of December 31 2020).

VAT

From the point of view of the applicable VAT regime, the transfer of the business unit consisting of the assets and liabilities constituting the Italian PE of ALFA, in favour of the new PE in Italy of BETA, is excluded from the field of application of VAT, pursuant to Article 2, paragraph 3, letter (b), of the Presidential Decree No. 633 of 1972.

In this regard, Article 19-bis2, paragraph 7, of the Presidential Decree No. 633 of 1972 obliges the taxable person beneficiary of business contribution to rectify the VAT deduction, if the conditions are met.

Registration tax

For the purposes of registration tax, considering that the business contribution is excluded from the field of application of VAT, it must be subject to registration tax according to Article 2, paragraph 1, letter (d), of the Presidential Decree No. 131 of 1986 (TUR), by virtue of the principle of VAT-register, alternatively referred to in Article 40 of the TUR.

In regard to the extent of the registration tax to be applied, it is necessary to refer to Article 4, paragraph 1, letter (b) of the Tariff, Part I, of the TUR, which establishes the application of the registration tax in a fixed amount. 

 

Gian Luca Nieddu

Partner

E: gianluca.nieddu@hager-partners.it

Barbara Scampuddu

Partner

E: barbara.scampuddu@hager-partners.it

 

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Two months since EU political agreement on pillar two and few member states have made progress on new national laws, but the arrival of OECD technical guidance should quicken the pace. Ralph Cunningham reports.
It’s one of the great ironies of recent history that a populist Republican may have helped make international tax policy more progressive.
Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF warns Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.