Switzerland publishes draft practice on VAT succession for asset deals

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland publishes draft practice on VAT succession for asset deals

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
The VAT succession leads to a full liability of the transferee for all VAT risks and opportunities.

Romy Müller and Matthias Höhn of Deloitte take a closer look at draft guidance issued by the Swiss tax authorities on VAT succession in the frame of an asset deal.

The Swiss Federal Tax Administration (SFTA) has reacted to the Federal Court decision dated February 21 2020 ruling out that there is a (partial) VAT succession for asset deals, and published its intended practice in a first draft.

The outlined practice implies a very strict and lean interpretation of the Federal Court case. According to this practice, a VAT succession in case of a transfer of a partial business only applies if the said transfer takes place between closely related parties.

According to a Federal Court decision (BGE 146 II 73 dated February 21 2020), a partial VAT succession according to Article 16 paragraph 2 Swiss VATL for a transfer of a business or an independent part thereof is established between transferor and transferee. Until this court decision, it was common ground that no VAT succession shall apply as long as the transferor continues to exist as regular taxpayer.

The VAT succession leads to a full liability of the transferee for all VAT risks and opportunities. As a consequence thereof, the transferee takes over full historical VAT ‘belongings’ deriving from the assets purchased for periods still open for assessment. It is important to note that joint liability between transferor and transferee according to Article 15 paragraph 1 Cap d Swiss VATL covers three years, whereas the usual VAT limitation period covers five years. Thus, the transferee will remain being solely responsible for two years.

The SFTA has published a first (not yet binding) draft of its intended practice to implement the Federal Court decision on VAT succession for asset deals.

Whereas the transfer of an entirety of a business always creates a VAT succession according to Article 16 paragraph 2 Swiss VATL, the anticipated practice suggests that for a transfer of an independent part of a business tax succession, this only applies in cases when a transfer happens between closely related parties (Article 3 Cap h Swiss VATL). As a consequence thereof, VAT succession seems to excluded in cases of a) a transfer between parties that do not qualify as closely related or b) the assets involved in the transfer do not qualify as independent part of a business.

In cases of assets deals, it is therefore crucial to evaluate the VAT risks in the frame of a due diligence exercise, both for the transferor and the transferee.

  Romy Müller
Director, Deloitte
E: romymueller@deloitte.ch


 

Matthias Höhn
Senior manager, Deloitte
E: mhoehn@deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Despite the shortfall, effective tax rates of multinationals have seen a ‘statistically significant rise’
After joining Milbank from Akin Gump, the fund tax specialist discusses sponsor demand, practice building, and the tax challenges facing asset managers
Partner payouts could also be reduced by a fifth, it has been reported
There is no logical reason not to extend an exemption from EU CFC rules to multinationals headquartered in side-by-side jurisdictions, USCIB said
Gift this article