International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland publishes draft practice on VAT succession for asset deals

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
The VAT succession leads to a full liability of the transferee for all VAT risks and opportunities.

Romy Müller and Matthias Höhn of Deloitte take a closer look at draft guidance issued by the Swiss tax authorities on VAT succession in the frame of an asset deal.

The Swiss Federal Tax Administration (SFTA) has reacted to the Federal Court decision dated February 21 2020 ruling out that there is a (partial) VAT succession for asset deals, and published its intended practice in a first draft.

The outlined practice implies a very strict and lean interpretation of the Federal Court case. According to this practice, a VAT succession in case of a transfer of a partial business only applies if the said transfer takes place between closely related parties.

According to a Federal Court decision (BGE 146 II 73 dated February 21 2020), a partial VAT succession according to Article 16 paragraph 2 Swiss VATL for a transfer of a business or an independent part thereof is established between transferor and transferee. Until this court decision, it was common ground that no VAT succession shall apply as long as the transferor continues to exist as regular taxpayer.

The VAT succession leads to a full liability of the transferee for all VAT risks and opportunities. As a consequence thereof, the transferee takes over full historical VAT ‘belongings’ deriving from the assets purchased for periods still open for assessment. It is important to note that joint liability between transferor and transferee according to Article 15 paragraph 1 Cap d Swiss VATL covers three years, whereas the usual VAT limitation period covers five years. Thus, the transferee will remain being solely responsible for two years.

The SFTA has published a first (not yet binding) draft of its intended practice to implement the Federal Court decision on VAT succession for asset deals.

Whereas the transfer of an entirety of a business always creates a VAT succession according to Article 16 paragraph 2 Swiss VATL, the anticipated practice suggests that for a transfer of an independent part of a business tax succession, this only applies in cases when a transfer happens between closely related parties (Article 3 Cap h Swiss VATL). As a consequence thereof, VAT succession seems to excluded in cases of a) a transfer between parties that do not qualify as closely related or b) the assets involved in the transfer do not qualify as independent part of a business.

In cases of assets deals, it is therefore crucial to evaluate the VAT risks in the frame of a due diligence exercise, both for the transferor and the transferee.

  Romy Müller
Director, Deloitte
E: romymueller@deloitte.ch

 

Matthias Höhn
Senior manager, Deloitte
E: mhoehn@deloitte.ch

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.
Caroline Setliffe and Ben Shem-Tov of Eversheds Sutherland give an overview of the US transfer pricing penalty regime and UK diverted profits tax considerations for multinational companies.
The result follows what EY said was one of the most successful years in the firm’s history.