A look at the proposed loss relief rules in the Netherlands

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

A look at the proposed loss relief rules in the Netherlands

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_piper.png
The aim of the proposal is a more gradual set-off of losses.

Jian-Cheng Ku and Ilse Lagerweij of DLA Piper Netherlands assess the changes to the 2021 tax budget rules concerning the deductibility of losses.

On October 5 2020, the Dutch Ministry of Finance published an important clarification to its proposed 2021 tax budget rules for the deductibility of losses. In this article, we will provide further details on the proposed rules and highlight what the impact of these rules can be for businesses and taxpayers.

Background

After a recommendation of the Committee Taxation of Multinationals in their report of April 2020, a new regime for loss relief in the corporate income tax act was presented in the 2021 Dutch tax budget. The proposed regime should enter into force as of January 1 2022.



Under the proposed rules, losses can be carried forward indefinitely, but the deduction of losses is subject to a threshold. The aim of the proposal is a more gradual set-off of losses.

What has changed?

The current loss relief regime permits losses to be carried back one year and carried forward six years. After six years, the losses, if they have not yet been utilised, will expire and no longer be deductible.



As mentioned previously, under the newly proposed rules, losses can be carried forward indefinitely. For the carry back of losses, the limitation of one year stays in place.



Compared to the current regime, this is more in line with the so-called ’overall profit principle’ (totaalwinst) in the Netherlands. The overall profit principle must ensure, to the extent possible, that entities are taxed over the total amount of profit or loss during their entire lifetime. Since under the proposed regime losses do not expire, there is no longer a breach of the overall profit principle.



However, the proposed measures do limit the deductibility of losses in terms of the amount per year. Losses can be offset against taxable profits up to a threshold of €1 million ($1.18 million) plus 50% of the taxable profit exceeding €1 million. Therefore, most small businesses will not be limited in their loss deductibility potential.

Transitional law

The rules will enter into force on January 1 2022. The clarification of the Ministry of Finance confirmed that the new rules apply to all losses that occur after January 1 2022 and all losses that are still in place at year-end 2021. The new rules therefore also apply to losses occurred in 2013 that has not yet been deducted, as previous transitional law allowed losses from 2013 to be carried forward for nine years. After January 1 2022, these losses will become deductible indefinitely.

Key takeaways

Although the legislative proposal has not yet been passed into law, the introduction of the indefinite carry forward of losses can be commended, as it aligns with the overall profit principle.



In addition, the proposed loss relief regime is more in line with that of surrounding countries such as Germany, Belgium and the UK. These countries also apply rules that limit loss relief per year instead of by an expiration date.



Lastly, perhaps the most important for now, the transitional law is very favourable, as losses from 2013 and after are deductible indefinitely as from January 1 2022.

 



Jian-Cheng Ku

T: +31 20 541 9911 

E: jian-cheng.ku@dlapiper.com



Ilse Lagerweij 

E: ilse.lagerweij@dlapiper.com


more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article