All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Romania: The tax consequences of working from anywhere

Sponsored by

Companies must be legally and fiscally prepared to ‘work from anywhere’

Corina Mîndoiu and Cătălina Butan of EY Romania consider how national lockdowns have created fresh tax considerations for cross-border workers.

The COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally changed the way that employees work. Having a presence in office buildings has quickly been replaced by solutions such as ‘working from home’, and could soon be effectively replaced again by ‘working from anywhere’ – an option which had seemed impossible in Romania a year ago.

In Romania, the relaxation of the restrictive measures imposed by the authorities, led to many employees choosing to move their activity as far as possible from their adapted daily routine at home after a repetitive three months. The ‘new office’ can even be situated thousands of miles away, if it comes bundled with a good internet connection. However, the mirage of ‘work from anywhere’ can attract a range of tax and legal challenges, which must be considered by both employers and employees.

In this scenario, it is important to analyse under which circumstances that the salary income obtained from the home country employer, could become taxable in the country where the individual carries out their activity. Some key aspects in this analysis would be the period of presence abroad, the country with which the individual’s personal and economic relations are closer, and the place available to the individual abroad, e.g. a rented or owned property, or hotel accommodation.

For example, a presence of more than 183 days, the fact that the individual is accompanied by their family, or has a place available anytime for use in the host location, could trigger tax residence in the respective state, and taxation on salary income from the first day of presence there. Taxation could be triggered not only on salary income in the host location, but also on personal worldwide income (e.g. interests, dividends, capital gains, rental income, obtained from home or host locations, as well as from other countries).

The legislation of the country where the employee plans to temporarily move, as well as the double tax treaty and the totalisation agreement on social charges, in place between the respective country and the home country should be carefully analysed. This would assist to establish the income tax and social charges obligations of the parties involved, employee or employer, and avoid potential tax exposures and double taxation on the same income.

For example, in the EU member countries, working remotely in another country may result in the employer's obligation to register for social security reporting and payment in the country of destination. Additional obligations under local law in the state where the employee chooses to work temporarily could also arise. Another key tax topic within cross-border remote work arrangements is the potential permanent establishment risk that the home employer could face in the host location.

The request for overseas remote working could come not only from the employees seeking for a change of their home office, but also from businesses which are starting to consider within global mobility policies virtual work for new hires, and virtual assignments in response to the pandemic. A virtual assignee does not physically relocate and works for the benefit of the host location from the home country. A virtual assignment could come with several benefits, such as reduced concerns about personal and family health and mitigating immigration risks. However, at the same time, it may face various challenges, also from a tax perspective, where multiple factors should be considered, such as the permanent establishment risk, income tax and social charges implications, individual tax residence.

It is recommended for the employer to have a pre-established framework for cross-border remote working, by personal or business requests, that sets out the rights and obligations of all parties involved (i.e. home employer, employee or host ‘beneficiary’ employer), covering both tax and legal aspects.

Some states have even decided to facilitate a process by which foreign nationals can live and work temporarily in their territory. Some of these countries are popular tourist destinations, which are trying to partially compensate for losses caused by the pandemic. Among the countries that are facilitating the immigration process include Barbados, Bermuda, Estonia and Georgia.

The immigration rules for work in the countries where the employees choose to temporarily move should be carefully looked at, since in many cases they differ significantly from the rules applicable for tourism, the latter usually being less restrictive.

Romania still does not offer related tax or immigration facilities in this respect, specific to remote work, although a flat salary tax rate of 10% could be attractive for foreign employees. Such a working model in Romania could also attract a tax residence, with only 10% tax on most types of personal worldwide income.

At opposite poles, in the case of virtual assignments to Romania, the salary income derived by a foreign tax resident for activities performed remotely from abroad (where the employment is exercised) for the benefit of a Romanian entity should not be subject to income tax or social charges in Romania. The right of taxation should normally stay with the home country, where the employment is exercised. There are no specific provisions in Romanian tax law on virtual assignments and, consequently, the general ones should be observed, closely together with the ones from the double tax treaties.

As the requests for remote working are here to stay, from people and organisations, companies must be legally and fiscally prepared for the paradigm shift from ‘work from home’ to ‘work from anywhere’, and consider the various domestic laws and double tax treaties, agreements on social security coordination and OECD guidance.

Corina Mîndoiu

T: +40 74 511 52 56 


Cătălina Butan

T: +40 73 267 54 05


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UN may be set to assume a global role in tax policy that would rival the OECD, while automakers lobby the US to change its tax rules on Chinese materials.
Companies including Valentino and EveryMatrix say the early adoption of EU public CbCR rules could boost transparency of local and foreign MNEs, despite the short notice.
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2023 ITR Tax Awards in Asia-Pacific, Europe Middle East & Africa, and the Americas.
Tax authorities and customs are failing multinationals by creating uncertainty with contradictory assessment and guidance, say in-house tax directors.
The CJEU said the General Court erred in law when it ruled that both companies benefitted from Italian state aid.
An OECD report reveals multinationals have continued to shift profits to low-tax jurisdictions, reinforcing the case for strong multilateral action in response.
The UK government announced plans to increase taxes on oil and gas profits, while the Irish government considers its next move on tax reform.
War and COVID have highlighted companies’ unpreparedness to deal with sudden geo-political changes, say TP specialists.
A source who has seen the draft law said it brings clarity on intangibles and other areas of TP including tax planning.
Tax consultants say companies must not ignore financial transactions in their TP policies as authorities, particularly in the UK, become more demanding.