International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Considering the assessed value of building plots in Portugal

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-vieira.png
Taxpayers owning building plots should review the VPT of their plots

Rita Magalhães and Bárbara Miragaia of Vieira de Almeida analyse whether the Portuguese tax authorities are unnoticeably doubling the assessed value of properties.

The assessed value (Portuguese acronym: VPT) of buildings is determined in accordance with the Municipal Property Tax (IMI) Code’s standard formula, which incorporates six criteria specifically designed to evaluate urban buildings: average cost of construction per square meter (Vc); surface area (A); occupancy coefficient (Ca); location coefficient (Cl); quality and comfort coefficient; and (Cq) age coefficient (Cv).

The act provides a different formula to calculate the VPT of building plots: “the assessed value of building plots shall be the sum of the value of the buildable area, namely the area within the perimeter where the building will be built, measured by the outside part, and the value of the land adjacent to the buildable area”. 



According to the law, the value of the buildable area could represent between 15% and 45% of the value of the licensed or planned buildings, after taking into account existing accesses, social facilities nearby, public transport offer, and whether the plot is considered prime property. As the location coefficient (Cl) in the standard VPT calculation formula varies in accordance with these exact same parameters, Portuguese higher courts have concluded that the standard VPT formula coefficients should not apply when calculating the VPT of building plots to prevent applying by analogy a formula specifically designed for buildings. The courts have therefore understood that the letter of the law does not allow applying by analogy to the evaluation of building plots an evaluation formula specifically designed for built property. This would actually breach the principle of legality, since the analogy is expressly prohibited in tax matters.



Practical application



Recent Portuguese case law has ruled out the application of the location coefficient (Cl) when calculating the VPT of building plots to prevent double taxation, as this coefficient is already included in the calculation of the percentage used to determine the value of the buildable area. 



Using the location coefficient both in the calculation of the buildable area value and in the evaluation of the building plot would be tantamount to double taxation, as the same reality would influence the relevant VPT twice.



If the Cl is set aside in the application of the formula, the VPT of the plots could drop significantly (particularly considering that the Cl can reach 3.5%). 



Taxpayers owning building plots should review the VPT of their plots assigned by the Portuguese tax authorities to see if it has been properly determined and weigh the pros and cons of requesting a new evaluation.



Requesting a new evaluation based on an error in the application of the legal evaluation criteria, namely the application of the Cl twice, could bring about a very significant reduction of the VPT and of the taxes calculated based on the VPT, that is to say, IMI and additional to IMI, but it could also trigger the re-evaluation of all criteria included in the determination of a plot’s VPT, something that may not always be in the taxpayer’s best interest. Taxpayers would be well advised to weigh the potential impact of a VPT re-evaluation carefully before proceeding.





Rita Magalhães

T: +351 21 311 3485

E: ram@vda.pt



Bárbara Miragaia 

T: +351 21 311 3400

E: bam@vda.pt

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.
Caroline Setliffe and Ben Shem-Tov of Eversheds Sutherland give an overview of the US transfer pricing penalty regime and UK diverted profits tax considerations for multinational companies.
The result follows what EY said was one of the most successful years in the firm’s history.