International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hong Kong SAR updates DIPN 48 on streamlining APAs

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
 Some tax authorities are looking to audits as a means of replenishing depleted coffers

Lewis Lu and John Timpany of KPMG analyse the implications of the revised guidance on advance pricing arrangements in Hong Kong SAR.

On July 15 2020, the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) released the revised Departmental Interpretation and Practice Notes No. 48 (DIPN 48).

The updates were to: (a) reflect the legislative changes made by the Inland Revenue (Amendment) (No. 6) Ordinance 2018 in relation to the statutory advance pricing arrangement (APA) regime in Hong Kong SAR; and (b) explain the streamlined APA process.



DIPN 48



The key revisions in DIPN 48 include the following:



Unilateral APA: Unilateral APA applications are now accepted. This is to provide certainty for related party transactions with jurisdictions which Hong Kong SAR has no double tax agreement (DTA) with.



APA rollback: Requests for rollback of transfer pricing (TP) methodology under bilateral and multilateral APAs can be considered. This provides a means of resolving collateral issues and reduces the overall time needed for the APA process. The rollback option also helps to manage historical risk in that tax audits/TP inquiries from prior years may be resolved with less penalty pressure.



Streamlined APA process: The APA process has been streamlined from the original five-stage process to a three-stage process, namely: (i) Stage 1: Early engagement; (ii) Stage 2: APA application; and (iii) Stage 3: Monitoring and compliance. The level of documentation required at the early stage has also been reduced. These overall revisions aim to improve the timeliness and efficiency of processing APA applications. 



Application to permanent establishments and other transactions: The coverage of APAs has been extended to include the attribution of profit to a permanent establishment in Hong Kong SAR (with a threshold of HK$20 million business profits per annum). The changes also include transactions other than the sale or purchase of goods, provision of services and use of intangible properties (with a threshold of HK$20 million per annum).



APA fees: Further guidance is provided regarding the fee payable for an APA application, including the provision of a fee estimate by any independent expert from whom the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) would like to seek assistance. This enables taxpayers to better quantify the potential costs involved and accordingly decide whether the APA application should be proceeded with or not.



Other considerations: Considerations as to when a taxpayer should enter an APA and when the IRD will prioritise an APA application are also provided. 



KPMG observations



The revised DIPN 48 reflects the IRD’s commitment to further develop the APA programme in Hong Kong SAR. This is welcomed given the significant increase in TP controversies internationally as well as locally since the OECD’s action plan against BEPS was introduced. The indicators provided in the updated DIPN 48 with respect to suitability of concluding APAs allow taxpayers to better evaluate the feasibility of a potential APA before initiating the process. 



The streamlined APA programme offers taxpayers an improved avenue to lock in their TP positions in Hong Kong SAR and counterparty jurisdictions, which could potentially help to resolve any existing controversies or uncertainties. Taxpayers should seek professional advice during this process to ensure an all-rounded assessment is conducted.



Lewis Lu

T: +86 10 8508 5002

E: lewis.lu@kpmg.com



John Timpany

T: +852 2143 8790

E: john.timpany@kpmg.com




more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Two months since EU political agreement on pillar two and few member states have made progress on new national laws, but the arrival of OECD technical guidance should quicken the pace. Ralph Cunningham reports.
It’s one of the great ironies of recent history that a populist Republican may have helped make international tax policy more progressive.
Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF warns Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.