International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia announces tax measures to tackle COVID-19 business disruption

Sponsored by


Jun Au of DLA Piper discusses how the Australian government and the Australian Tax Office have moved to assist businesses affected by the ongoing COVID-19 outbreak.

Even as the pandemic ensues, COVID-19 has already had a significant impact on businesses and the economy worldwide. As a result, the Australian government has been focused on responding to the implications of COVID-19, and a whole raft of related measures have been introduced by both the government and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) to provide certainty and relief to businesses.

JobKeeper wage subsidy programme

In response to the financial effect of the outbreak, the Australian federal government has introduced the JobKeeper stimulus package. JobKeeper is a wage subsidy programme for Australian businesses who are experiencing a substantial decline in turnover. The programme will run from March 30 2020 to September 27 2020. 

In correspondence with the changes that have been made to the Fair Work Act 2009 to allow for its operation, the JobKeeper programmes operates as a pre-tax payment of AUD$1,500 (US$975) per fortnight from the government to qualifying employers. While in receipt of this government payment, employers will have an obligation to meet a minimum payment obligation to pay at least AUD$1,500 per fortnight (before tax) to eligible employees. Those employers will then be required to ensure that they make a payment to the relevant eligible employee of at least AUD$1,500 per fortnight before tax. 

For eligibility as a participant in the JobKeeper scheme, businesses must provide that: 

1) As at March 1 2020, it carried on a business in Australia, or was a not-for-profit that pursued its objectives principally in Australia;

2) Its goods and services tax (GST) turnover (monthly or quarterly) has declined, or is projected to decline, in 2020 (when compared to 2019) by at least:

  • 30% (if annual aggregated turnover is, or is likely to be, less than AUD$1 billion);

  • 50% (if annual aggregated turnover is, or is likely to be, AUD$1 billion or more); or

  • 15% (for charities registered with the Australian Charities and Not-For-Profit Commission (ACNC));

For JobKeeper purposes, annual turnover includes the turnover of the employer, its affiliates and associates. Thus, a small business that is part of a larger group (i.e. with aggravated turnover of AUD$1 billion or more) must have a 50% decline in turnover. Importantly, there is no ‘causation’ test – the entity does not need to demonstrate that the turnover decline was directly caused by COVID-19.

ATO guidance on global mobility issues arising from COVID-19

In the wake of COVID-19, the ATO has released guidance on the various tax issues which could arise when multinational group taxpayers or their employees are forced to change their behaviour to comply with COVID‑19 travel restrictions and quarantines. These issues include permanent establishment matters, residence status of a company (central management and control), and the tax residence status of individuals.

In relation to permanent establishments, the ATO’s guidance states that if a foreign company did not otherwise have a permanent establishment in Australia before the impacts of COVID-19, and the presence of the employees in Australia is because they are temporarily relocated or restricted in their travel as a consequence of COVID-19, this should not lead to the creation of new permanent establishments for the enterprise in Australia. 

In relation to the central management and control of companies, the ATO’s view is that if the only reason for holding board meetings in Australia, or directors attending board meetings from Australia, is because of impacts of COVID-19, then the Commissioner will not apply compliance resources to determine if the entity’s central management and control is in Australia.

With regards to the tax residency status of individuals, the ATO has stated that an individual who is otherwise a non-resident of Australia should not become an Australian resident for tax purposes by virtue of being in Australia temporarily as a result of the COVID-19 crisis. This is on the basis that the individual lives overseas permanently and intends to return there as soon as they are able to. 

COVID-19 related employment tax issues

COVID-19 has seen the rise in increased expenditure incurred by employers, who have ordered to assist employees with the changes in working practices. These additional expenditures include assistance pertaining to accommodation, transport, first aid or emergency health care. Such expenditure can generally attract fringe benefits tax (FBT), however there are exemptions which may relieve any such liability where the assistance provided to the employee can be classified as ‘emergency assistance’ for the purpose of the FBT laws.

In addition, for employees who choose to work from home during this time, if employers provide employees with certain equipment/devices to enable them to work from home, these will usually be exempt from FBT.

Jun Au

T: +61 2 9286 8258


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Premier League football clubs are accused of avoiding paying up to £470 million in UK tax, while Malta is poised to overhaul its unique corporate tax system.
Bartosz Doroszuk of MDDP offers insights on Poland’s new tax legislation on shifted profits, as the implementation deadline looms nearer.
Four tax specialists preview the UK’s transfer pricing requirements, which come into effect on April 1.
The rise of the QDMTT will likely change how countries compete on tax and transfer pricing policy, but it may not reverse decades of falling corporate tax rates.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.