All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Poland: The difficulty of applying withholding tax exemptions for corporate dividend recipients

Sponsored by sponsored-firms-mddp.png
Businesses will have a few months to analyse the impact of the UKGT on their business

Monika Marta Dziedzic of MDDP shares how shareholders will find it increasingly difficult when applying for Polish dividend withholding tax refund requests.

The standard dividends withholding tax in Poland is 19%. This applies to both resident and non-resident recipients, individuals and corporate income taxpayers. EU dividend participation exemption is included in local regulations and the following criteria has to be met jointly:

  1. Minimum 10% direct shareholding for at least two years uninterruptedly; 

  2. The recipient is a tax resident in the EU, which is confirmed with a relevant tax certificate; 

  3. The recipient of the dividend is taxed in the country of its tax residency on its worldwide income and is not exempt from income tax therein – which is confirmed with a written statement of the dividend recipient held by the dividend payer;

  4. The shares in dividends payed are owned (ownership as a title to the shares) by the recipient of dividend;

  5. There is a legal ground for tax information exchange between Poland and the country of the dividend recipient;

  6. The dividend is paid as a result of a bona fide business transaction (e.g. it was not preceded by artificial one). 


These formal requirements of dividend participation exemption resulting from Polish corporate income tax (CIT) law have not changed in 2019, despite the introduction of the new withholding tax system. In principle, these have existed with adjustments in Polish tax law, since when Poland had joined the EU in 2004.




It can be noted that there is no ‘substance’ requirement, nor is there a ‘beneficial owner’ requirement that would apply to dividend participation exemption. There are no other factors than those listed above criteria specified by Polish law to apply the participation exemption to dividends. 



In practice, however, if the withholding tax is collected by the dividend payer and the non-Polish shareholder requests for a withholding tax refund, the expectations of tax authorities are broader. Besides a tax residency certificate, the shareholder has to prove (it is not enough to state) that it is a beneficial owner of the dividends.



The Polish definition of the beneficial owner differs a lot from the OECD’s standard. In addition to regular factors, such as not acting as an agent, trustee or intermediary, Polish law requires that the beneficial owner runs a so-called ‘genuine business activity’ as specified by Polish law. 



Conditions of the shareholder



The shareholder is in practice, asked to provide: the last financial statement and a consolidated financial statement, the agreement on the lease of office, a list of employees, a list of fixed assets and intangibles owned, a detailed description of the investment portfolio (name of the companies owned, % of shares owned, acquisition date and value – book or market one), the structure of the group (diagram), concluded agreements (to support that the shareholder is not dormant), transfer pricing documentation, and a breakdown of costs. All documents must be provided to the authorities in Polish, so costly sworn translation is often involved. 



The shareholder is also requested to submit a very detailed statement confirming that they hold the beneficial ownership of the dividends, that they operate a non-artificial structure, and that the withholding tax dividend participation exemption is not the only – or one of the main purposes – of their involvement.



In the statement, it must also be clarified that the shareholder is not operating purely to pay dividends from Poland to a beneficiary, and that it has the economic and legal rights to make a decision on the use of the dividends. Furthermore, the shareholder must confirm that he operates a real business in the country of its tax residency using adequate resources, and that the shareholder is independent in its functioning by using assets it owns and having management present on site.

Practice proves that it is usually much easier to apply the withholding tax exemption by paying a subsidiary than to withhold the tax and apply for the refund. Especially, this would be the case as long as the €460,000 threshold (all payments subject to withholding tax to one taxpayer) is on hold and all dividends are below that level. 



Monika Marta Dziedzic

T: +48 22 322 68 88

E: monika.dziedzic@mddp.pl





More from across our site

This week European Commission officials consider legal loopholes to secure minimum corporate taxation, while Cisco and Microsoft shareholders call for tax transparency.
The fast-food company’s tax settlement with French authorities strengthens the need for businesses to review their TP arrangements and documentation.
The full ALP model will be adopted through a new TP regime, which is set to boost the country’s investments and tax certainty.
Tax professionals have called on the UK government to reconsider its online sales tax as it would affect the economy at the worst time.
Tax professionals have called on companies to act urgently to meet e-invoicing compliance targets as the EU plans to ramp up digitisation.
In the wake of India’s ambitious 25-year plan for economic growth, ITR has partnered with leading tax commentators to discuss what the future will look like for India and for the rest of the world.
But experts cast doubt on HMRC's data and believe COVID-19 would have increased the revenue shortfall.
EY’s plan to separate its auditing and consulting businesses might lessen scrutiny from global regulators, but the brand identity could suffer, say sources.
Multinationals are asking world leaders to put a scale on carbon pricing to tackle climate change at the 48th G7 summit in Germany, from June 26 to 28.
The state secretary told the French press that the country continues to oppose pillar two’s global minimum tax rate following an Ecofin meeting last week.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree