All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Brexit and Switzerland: The 'mind the gap' agreement on social security

Sponsored by

A soft landing solution is being discussed for the post-Brexit scenario

David Wigersma and Tabea Nyfeler of Deloitte Switzerland discuss what a possible ‘no-deal’ Brexit may mean for British-Swiss relations.

As the legal ramifications of Brexit continue to be finalised, Switzerland and the UK have been working together on a soft landing solution to avoid major disruption to their relations in the case of a ‘no deal’ scenario.

On October 31, it was announced that a new agreement between Switzerland and the UK has been signed. This transitional agreement (as part of the Swiss “mind-the-gap” strategy) covers the ‘no deal’ scenario and shall ensure that the rules of the agreement on the free movement of persons in the area of social security can continue to be applied until December 31 2020.

This means that the rules on coordination will continue to apply to Swiss and UK citizens and also to other EU nationals working in Switzerland or the UK. The agreement will therefore close the gap until new final rules come into force between Switzerland and the UK.

Earlier, in December 2018, Switzerland and the UK negotiated an agreement on citizens’ rights including on the protection of acquired rights in the area of social security. This meant that if an individual became subject to Swiss social security legislation before January 31 2020, there would be continued A1 coverage (also after January 31), as long as their employment conditions and work pattern did not change significantly.

The new agreement is more encompassing compared to the agreement of December 2018 as it ensures the application of the agreement on the free movement of persons and therefore includes all EU nationals. This means that even if an individual becomes subject to Swiss social security after January 31 2020, an A1 could still be applied for.

Main areas to be considered in a ‘no deal’ Brexit scenario:

1. Communications: connecting with employees around the potential impact on their social security position, access to benefits, and steps being taken to mitigate this impact

2. Additional costs: quantifying potential additional costs either directly through additional social security costs, or the need to compensate staff for reduced access to state benefits;

3. Payroll compliance: working with your payroll teams in home and host countries to ensure that systems have the ability to deal with dual contribution situations and the necessary data flows are in place to enable them to perform the appropriate calculations and filings; and

4. Policy approach: determining the level of support you are prepared to offer employees to mitigate the impact of potential additional employee social security costs, or the need to compensate staff for reduced access to state benefits (e.g. family benefits).

All of the areas are critical issues from a mobility and talent perspective and while it is still too early to implement any policy or procedural changes due to the fluid political situation, it can be strongly recommended that employers operating internationally should adapt any contingency plans that they have developed for a ‘no deal’ Brexit.

David Wigersma

T: +41 58 279 9260


Tabea Nyfeler

T: +41 58 279 60 00


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UN’s decision to seek a leadership role in global tax policy could be a crucial turning point but won’t be the end of the OECD, say tax experts.
The UN may be set to assume a global role in tax policy that would rival the OECD, while automakers lobby the US to change its tax rules on Chinese materials.
Companies including Valentino and EveryMatrix say the early adoption of EU public CbCR rules could boost transparency of local and foreign MNEs, despite the short notice.
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2023 ITR Tax Awards in Asia-Pacific, Europe Middle East & Africa, and the Americas.
Tax authorities and customs are failing multinationals by creating uncertainty with contradictory assessment and guidance, say in-house tax directors.
The CJEU said the General Court erred in law when it ruled that both companies benefitted from Italian state aid.
An OECD report reveals multinationals have continued to shift profits to low-tax jurisdictions, reinforcing the case for strong multilateral action in response.
The UK government announced plans to increase taxes on oil and gas profits, while the Irish government considers its next move on tax reform.
War and COVID have highlighted companies’ unpreparedness to deal with sudden geo-political changes, say TP specialists.
A source who has seen the draft law said it brings clarity on intangibles and other areas of TP including tax planning.