International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand: Proposed changes to foreign investment consent rules to include tax measures

Sponsored by

The proposed changes hope to make foreign investment more transparent.

Brendan Brown and Alex Ladyman of Russell McVeagh assess the impact of the tax measures likely to feature in the Government's proposed changes to the Overseas Investment Act.

The New Zealand Government has announced a range of changes to the foreign investment consent rules, to be enacted as part of the second phase of its reform of the Overseas Investment Act 2005. A summary of the Government's announcement can be found here

The announcement follows the release in April 2019 of a consultation document by the New Zealand Treasury that noted a concern about "overseas persons acquiring sensitive New Zealand assets and not paying enough tax in New Zealand. This could be viewed as contrary to the [Overseas Investment] Act's purpose, which recognises that it is a privilege for overseas persons to own or control such assets." 

The consultation document proposed a number of measures to address this. While the details of the proposals in relation to tax have not yet been confirmed, it is understood that the rules will provide for consideration of the prospective investor's tax compliance history, and disclosure to the Inland Revenue Department of the proposed investment structure and its expected tax consequences.

Consideration of tax compliance history

New Zealand's existing overseas investment regime requires overseas persons to obtain consent from the Overseas Investment Office prior to investing in significant business assets or sensitive land. To obtain consent to invest in either category of sensitive asset, the overseas person (or the individuals with control, defined broadly to include shareholders with 25% or more ownership, directors, or in some cases senior management) must meet the "investor test". 

Currently the scope of the investor test is broad, including a good character test that requires consideration of any offences or contraventions of the law, and any other matters that reflect adversely on a person's fitness to have the particular overseas investment. 

Under the announced changes, the good character test will be replaced with a more targeted list of factors that decision-makers considering an application for investment consent should take into account. The scope of offences or contraventions to the law that are considered will be narrowed to convictions (or allegations where formal proceedings have commenced) in relation to certain serious criminal offences or civil contraventions.

However, it is understood that the rules will also specifically provide for consideration of:

  • Penalties for tax evasion or similar acts (including equivalents in other jurisdictions); 

  • Penalties for an abusive tax position (including equivalents in other jurisdictions); and 

  • Tax defaults, where the investor has failed to pay an amount of tax payable of more than NZ$5 million (this will not include merely late payments).

The likelihood of special rules in respect of tax-related issues reflects the fact that in some jurisdictions, the tax authority itself (without needing to secure a conviction or judgment of a court) can impose material civil penalties (such as penalties for tax evasion). It is understood that decision makers considering an application for foreign investment consent will be able to consider these penalties once they are imposed by a tax authority, whether or not those penalties are challenged in court. However, if a court overturns a penalty, that penalty will no longer be taken into account.

New requirement to disclose tax information

The proposed changes are also expected to include a requirement for persons applying for foreign investment consent to disclose information regarding their investment (such as the financing structure to be used) and the proposed tax treatment of that investment. The information would not be used in deciding whether consent should be granted, but would be provided to Inland Revenue to allow Inland Revenue to monitor the person's compliance with New Zealand tax law, and to help inform Inland Revenue's broader policy and audit functions.

Next steps

The details of the proposed changes and how they might operate in practice will become clearer once draft legislation to give effect to the proposals is released. In this regard, Associate Minister of Finance Hon David Parker has stated that a bill to implement the changes will be introduced in early 2020. Further consultation on the detail is expected during the bill's passage through the New Zealand Parliament.

Brendan Brown

T: +64 4 819 7748


Alex Ladyman


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.
Industry groups are concerned about the shift away from the ALP towards formulary apportionment as part of a common consolidated corporate tax base across the EU.
The former tax official in Italy will take up her post in April.
With marked economic disruption matched by a frenetic rate of regulatory upheaval, ITR partnered with Asia’s leading legal minds to navigate the continent’s growing complexity.
Lawmakers seem more reticent than ever to make ambitious tax proposals since the disastrous ‘mini-budget’ last September, but the country needs serious change.
The panel, the only one dedicated to tax at the World Economic Forum, comprised government ministers and other officials.
Colombian Finance Minister José Antonio Ocampo announced preparations for a Latin American tax summit, while the potentially ‘dangerous’ Inflation Reduction Act has come under fire.
The OECD’s two-pillar solution may increase global tax revenue gains by more than $200 billion a year, but pillar one is the key to such gains due to its fundamental changes to taxing rights.
The solution to address the tax challenges arising from digitalisation and globalisation will generate more revenue than previously estimated.