New Zealand: Proposed changes to foreign investment consent rules to include tax measures
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand: Proposed changes to foreign investment consent rules to include tax measures

Sponsored by

The proposed changes hope to make foreign investment more transparent.

Brendan Brown and Alex Ladyman of Russell McVeagh assess the impact of the tax measures likely to feature in the Government's proposed changes to the Overseas Investment Act.

The New Zealand Government has announced a range of changes to the foreign investment consent rules, to be enacted as part of the second phase of its reform of the Overseas Investment Act 2005. A summary of the Government's announcement can be found here

The announcement follows the release in April 2019 of a consultation document by the New Zealand Treasury that noted a concern about "overseas persons acquiring sensitive New Zealand assets and not paying enough tax in New Zealand. This could be viewed as contrary to the [Overseas Investment] Act's purpose, which recognises that it is a privilege for overseas persons to own or control such assets." 

The consultation document proposed a number of measures to address this. While the details of the proposals in relation to tax have not yet been confirmed, it is understood that the rules will provide for consideration of the prospective investor's tax compliance history, and disclosure to the Inland Revenue Department of the proposed investment structure and its expected tax consequences.

Consideration of tax compliance history

New Zealand's existing overseas investment regime requires overseas persons to obtain consent from the Overseas Investment Office prior to investing in significant business assets or sensitive land. To obtain consent to invest in either category of sensitive asset, the overseas person (or the individuals with control, defined broadly to include shareholders with 25% or more ownership, directors, or in some cases senior management) must meet the "investor test". 

Currently the scope of the investor test is broad, including a good character test that requires consideration of any offences or contraventions of the law, and any other matters that reflect adversely on a person's fitness to have the particular overseas investment. 

Under the announced changes, the good character test will be replaced with a more targeted list of factors that decision-makers considering an application for investment consent should take into account. The scope of offences or contraventions to the law that are considered will be narrowed to convictions (or allegations where formal proceedings have commenced) in relation to certain serious criminal offences or civil contraventions.

However, it is understood that the rules will also specifically provide for consideration of:

  • Penalties for tax evasion or similar acts (including equivalents in other jurisdictions); 

  • Penalties for an abusive tax position (including equivalents in other jurisdictions); and 

  • Tax defaults, where the investor has failed to pay an amount of tax payable of more than NZ$5 million (this will not include merely late payments).

The likelihood of special rules in respect of tax-related issues reflects the fact that in some jurisdictions, the tax authority itself (without needing to secure a conviction or judgment of a court) can impose material civil penalties (such as penalties for tax evasion). It is understood that decision makers considering an application for foreign investment consent will be able to consider these penalties once they are imposed by a tax authority, whether or not those penalties are challenged in court. However, if a court overturns a penalty, that penalty will no longer be taken into account.

New requirement to disclose tax information

The proposed changes are also expected to include a requirement for persons applying for foreign investment consent to disclose information regarding their investment (such as the financing structure to be used) and the proposed tax treatment of that investment. The information would not be used in deciding whether consent should be granted, but would be provided to Inland Revenue to allow Inland Revenue to monitor the person's compliance with New Zealand tax law, and to help inform Inland Revenue's broader policy and audit functions.

Next steps

The details of the proposed changes and how they might operate in practice will become clearer once draft legislation to give effect to the proposals is released. In this regard, Associate Minister of Finance Hon David Parker has stated that a bill to implement the changes will be introduced in early 2020. Further consultation on the detail is expected during the bill's passage through the New Zealand Parliament.

Brendan Brown

T: +64 4 819 7748


Alex Ladyman


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Experts from TP tech provider Aibidia also warned ITR that companies ignoring pillar two is a ‘huge issue’ and a ‘red flag’
Hanno Berger was originally handed an eight-year sentence over an estimated $11 billion tax fraud; while in other news, France calls for minimum tax on the super-rich
Amount B is meant to increase simplicity and reduce uncertainty, but US TP specialists claim it may lead to controversy
Tax Foundation economist Alan Cole also signalled that pillar two has a 'considerable chance' of failing
The Labour Party is working hard to convince business that it will bring stability to tax policy if it wins the next UK general election. But it will be impossible to avoid creating winners and losers
Burrowes had initially been parachuted into the role last summer to navigate the fallout from the firm’s tax leaks scandal
Barbara Voskamp is bullish on hiring local talent to boost DLA Piper’s Singapore practice, and argues that ‘big four’ accountants suffer from a stifled creativity
Chris Jordan also said that nations have a duty to scrutinise the partnership structures of major firms, while, in other news, a number of tax teams expanded their benches
KPMG has exclusive access to the tool for three years in the UK, giving it an edge over ‘big four’ rivals
But the US tax agency’s advice is consistent with OECD guidance and shouldn’t surprise anyone, other experts tell ITR
Gift this article