All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Brazil’s new political establishment cracks down on tax incentives

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-mattosfilho.png
Brazil is experiencing a number of fresh tax challenges

Alessandra Gomensoro and Ricardo Cosentino of Mattos Filho discuss the new tax challenges affecting Brazil

At the end of the last decade, Brazil experienced significant economic growth, despite an international downturn.

This economic growth was driven largely by three pillars that included: fiscal benefits, tax reliefs and sectoral incentives to production. This ensured a national bubble of constant consumption and apparent economic growth.




However, Brazil’s political crisis destabilised the artificially created environment for such economic development. In particular, the state blamed tax benefits for cash shortages, triggering a backlash against such reliefs.



There is no doubt that some of the regional fiscal benefits were granted in legally unusual ways, so they should indeed have been revoked. But the removal of tax benefits effected not only companies that had obtained them irregularly, but also companies that had been legally enjoying the effects.



In tandem to the crisis among Brazilian states, the federal government also began to cut incentives already granted. One of the most symbolic cases include the resumed taxation on retail sales of electronic products, whose revenue, in practice, was not levied for Program of Social Integration (PIS) and Contribution for the Financing of Social Security (COFINS), and on the payroll.



Although the strategy of cutting down incentives is controversial because it discourages production and affects the entire economic chain, the cuts have been accepted due to the government’s desire to increase cash revenue.



In addition to the government continuing to cut incentives abruptly, which ultimately destabilises companies without being able to adjust their business plans to the new reality, it has been trying to find cash in the most peculiar and critical sector for economic growth: the export sector.



It order to ensure a surplus economy, it is necessary that exports outweigh imports. Precisely because of their importance to growth, exports and specifically exports revenues have special treatment in the Brazilian tax system, with immunities and exemptions that encourage those who carry out export activities.



Irrespective of this importance, the Federal Revenue Service of Brazil issued an interpretation for levying the Financial Transactions (IOF) tax if revenue from exports is kept abroad (even for a couple of days), instead of being immediately remitted to Brazil.



The interpretation of the tax authority, in addition to its detrimental effect to the exporting incentive policy, is illegal, and has been repeatedly dismissed by the Courts. However, the most striking factor is not the practical effects of this interpretation, but the government’s lack of preparedness to understand that certain sectors of the economy should be treated as a priority.



This volatility in carrying out a fiscal policy that achieves short-term goals causes insecurity, and compromises even more the development of the country. It is important to understand that the economic growth desired is only possible if the law and the commitments made by the government are observe without surprise to investors.



Alessandra Gomensoro - Partner, Mattos Filho

T: +55 21 3231 8222

E: agomensoro@mattosfilho.com.br



Ricardo de Oliveira Cosentino - Tax lawyer, Mattos Filho

T: +55 21 3231 8112

E: ricardo.cosentino@mattosfilho.com.br

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Several tax chiefs shared their administrations’ latest digital identity tracking systems and other tax technologies at the OECD’s annual meeting of authorities.
Businesses welcome the UK’s decision to scrap the IR35 reforms but are not happy about the time and money they have wasted to date.
Energy ministers agreed on regulations including a windfall tax on fossil fuel companies to address high gas prices at an extraordinary Council meeting on September 30.
The European Parliament raises concerns over unanimity in voting on pillar two, while protests break out over tax reform in Colombia.
Ramesh Khaitan speaks to reporter Siqalane Taho about tax morality, transfer pricing regulations, Indian tax developments, and the OECD’s two-pillar solution.
Join ITR and KPMG China at 10am BST on October 19 as they discuss the personal, employment, and corporate tax-related implications of employees working from overseas.
Tricentis and Boehringer Ingelheim, along with a European Commission TP specialist, criticised the complexity of pillar one rules and their scope at an ITR event.
Speakers at ITR’s Managing Tax Disputes Summit said taxpayers can still face lengthy TP audits, despite strong documentation preparation
Gig economy companies in New Zealand will need to fully account and become liable for the goods and services tax of underlying suppliers on their platforms, under new proposals.
Join ITR and Thomson Reuters at 2pm (UAE) / 11am (UK) on October 13 as they discuss how businesses can prepare for Tax Administration 3.0 and future-proof against changes such as e-invoicing and increasing digitisation.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree