Brazil’s new political establishment cracks down on tax incentives
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil’s new political establishment cracks down on tax incentives

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-mattosfilho.png
Brazil is experiencing a number of fresh tax challenges

Alessandra Gomensoro and Ricardo Cosentino of Mattos Filho discuss the new tax challenges affecting Brazil

At the end of the last decade, Brazil experienced significant economic growth, despite an international downturn.

This economic growth was driven largely by three pillars that included: fiscal benefits, tax reliefs and sectoral incentives to production. This ensured a national bubble of constant consumption and apparent economic growth.




However, Brazil’s political crisis destabilised the artificially created environment for such economic development. In particular, the state blamed tax benefits for cash shortages, triggering a backlash against such reliefs.



There is no doubt that some of the regional fiscal benefits were granted in legally unusual ways, so they should indeed have been revoked. But the removal of tax benefits effected not only companies that had obtained them irregularly, but also companies that had been legally enjoying the effects.



In tandem to the crisis among Brazilian states, the federal government also began to cut incentives already granted. One of the most symbolic cases include the resumed taxation on retail sales of electronic products, whose revenue, in practice, was not levied for Program of Social Integration (PIS) and Contribution for the Financing of Social Security (COFINS), and on the payroll.



Although the strategy of cutting down incentives is controversial because it discourages production and affects the entire economic chain, the cuts have been accepted due to the government’s desire to increase cash revenue.



In addition to the government continuing to cut incentives abruptly, which ultimately destabilises companies without being able to adjust their business plans to the new reality, it has been trying to find cash in the most peculiar and critical sector for economic growth: the export sector.



It order to ensure a surplus economy, it is necessary that exports outweigh imports. Precisely because of their importance to growth, exports and specifically exports revenues have special treatment in the Brazilian tax system, with immunities and exemptions that encourage those who carry out export activities.



Irrespective of this importance, the Federal Revenue Service of Brazil issued an interpretation for levying the Financial Transactions (IOF) tax if revenue from exports is kept abroad (even for a couple of days), instead of being immediately remitted to Brazil.



The interpretation of the tax authority, in addition to its detrimental effect to the exporting incentive policy, is illegal, and has been repeatedly dismissed by the Courts. However, the most striking factor is not the practical effects of this interpretation, but the government’s lack of preparedness to understand that certain sectors of the economy should be treated as a priority.



This volatility in carrying out a fiscal policy that achieves short-term goals causes insecurity, and compromises even more the development of the country. It is important to understand that the economic growth desired is only possible if the law and the commitments made by the government are observe without surprise to investors.



Alessandra Gomensoro - Partner, Mattos Filho

T: +55 21 3231 8222

E: agomensoro@mattosfilho.com.br



Ricardo de Oliveira Cosentino - Tax lawyer, Mattos Filho

T: +55 21 3231 8112

E: ricardo.cosentino@mattosfilho.com.br

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

More than 1,000 PwC staff in China and Hong Kong engaged in improper answer sharing, it is understood
Yusuf Akhmadi of Indonesia’s Directorate General of Taxation reports on the country’s latest domestic and cross-border initiatives to clamp down on tax evasion
The new rate is a blow to Samsung, while two law firms have made significant tax hires into their respective Washington DC offices
Rema Serafi, KPMG’s first-ever female vice chair for tax, talks about breaking the mould in an exclusive interview with ITR
The metal multinational’s victory, in a case worth $12 million, continues the trend of companies coming out on top against India’s revenue department
Guy Bud and Matthew Greene from litigation firm Stewarts review a dispute on tiered partnerships, which raises questions on corporation tax and partnership law
The stagnating pay and tax bonuses cap follow slashed payouts for the deals team and business consolidation in the last month
A greater UN role has been secured after disagreements between developed and developing countries over the OECD’s influence in global tax reform
The US-based firm picks up investment fund specialist Ceinwen Rees, while Ireland nearly doubles its corporation tax receipts in three years
The order comes amid controversy over another of David Collard’s companies’ tax and TP affairs