International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

What to expect from the tax reform in Brazil

Sponsored by

A series of important changes are imminent

Glaucia Lauletta Frascino of Mattos Filho provides thought provoking discussion on the tax reforms being tabled in Brazil.

There is no doubt that we are living in a unique moment in the history of Brazil's tax system. Discussion on the topic has become a priority of civil society, which, in itself, is excellent news. There has long been talk of the need for tax reform in the country, but there have been few times when politically viable projects have evolved to become the subject of a broader debate, spurred on by the executive branch and, especially, the legislative branch, as we see happening now.

It is equally unquestionable that the attempt to simplify a chaotic tax system is absolutely praiseworthy and deserves to be taken seriously, especially when that system has as its backdrop a massive list of taxes, considerable uncertainty in the interpretation of its rules and, as a result, one of the biggest litigation sources (perhaps the biggest) in the world.

However, some questions are equally relevant throughout this discussion: what tax reform are we talking about? What are the constitutional limits of the reform? Also, what other values should go hand-in-hand with tax simplification so as to improve the country?

Of the various reform projects available, what appears to be the most viable one is the subject of Constitutional Amendment 45 (PEC 45), which is in progress before the Chamber of Deputies. The main change that PEC 45 would introduce would be a single tax – the tax on goods and services (Imposto sobre Bens e Serviços, or IBS) – whose most striking feature is a single rate within the scope of states and cities for all operations. The IBS would result from the unification of the existing federal, state and municipal taxes, specifically: 

  • The social integration programme, or PIS (Programa de Integração Social);

  • The contribution for social security financing, or COFINS (Contribuição para o Financiamento da Seguridade Social); 

  • The tax on industrialised products, or IPI (Imposto sobre Produtos Industrializados);

  • The tax on sales and services, or ICMS, which applies to the movement of goods, transportation, communication services, and other general supplying of goods (Imposto Sobre Operações Relativas à Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços de Transporte Interestadual de Intermunicipal e de Comunicações); and

  • The tax on services, or ISS (Imposto Sobre Serviços de Qualquer Natureza).

This project indeed has merits in valuing the simplification of the system and reducing the number of taxes levied on the consumption of goods and services. In addition it intelligently proposes a cultural change to the tax system of the country, with the elimination of tax benefits and the establishment of a single tax rate, so that companies become mere agents of taxes to be effectively paid by those who consume goods and services.

In addition to PEC 45, we have Constitutional Amendment Project 110 (PED 110), underway in the Senate, which proposes the unification of federal taxes only. Finally, there is the possibility of a federal government project, whose main feature would be the creation of a new tax on the movement and transfer of values to finance social security and which would reduce the financial burden on payroll. This would consequently lead to the creation of formal jobs in the country.

It is important to note that constitutional amendments may alter the Constitution, provided they do not affect the so-called entrenchment clauses. Those involve the individual rights and guarantees, such as federalism, which guarantee autonomy for Brazil and its states and municipalities, including in matters of taxation.

That is why no reform, however necessary, justifies breaking the constitutional order, nullifying one of the pillars of the federative system, which is precisely the autonomy of political bodies. Although Brazil and its states and municipalities have not wisely used such autonomy, it would be worse to accept a solution that would involve contempt for the Constitution.

Simplification is essential, and we have a unique opportunity to make it a reality. However, to consider it as an isolated objective, without addressing other topics, is to waste a rare opportunity to mobilise civil society and make taxation in the country a tool of tax justice and social development. Fostering a broad, deep, and definitive debate is the best legacy we can leave for future generations.

Glaucia Lauletta Frascino

T: 55 11 3147 7654


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Premier League football clubs are accused of avoiding paying up to £470 million in UK tax, while Malta is poised to overhaul its unique corporate tax system.
Bartosz Doroszuk of MDDP offers insights on Poland’s new tax legislation on shifted profits, as the implementation deadline looms nearer.
Four tax specialists preview the UK’s transfer pricing requirements, which come into effect on April 1.
The rise of the QDMTT will likely change how countries compete on tax and transfer pricing policy, but it may not reverse decades of falling corporate tax rates.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.