Payroll taxation: Is the existing model for technology companies enough?

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Payroll taxation: Is the existing model for technology companies enough?

Sponsored by

pinheirologo.png
Tech payroll

Cristiane I Matsumoto and Mariana Monte Alegre de Paiva of Pinheiro Neto Advogados discuss the shortcomings of Brazil’s payroll taxation regime.

Payroll taxation in Brazil is burdensome because the social security contribution is levied at around 40% over the payroll. Besides the main contribution of 20% which is destined to fund the workers’ retirement, there are several other contributions levied on the same basis for financing other components. The result is that formal employment in Brazil is expensive, which contributes to the informal employment situation.

In August 2011, the Brazilian economy was still recovering from the 2008 global crisis and the federal government implemented measures to reduce the overall tax burden. Among those measures was Provisional Measure 540, which was passed into Law 12 456/2011. This law introduced tax incentives for export companies and the automotive market, as well as a more favourable payroll taxation regime for specific companies, especially for those in the IT sector.

The new regime allegedly favoured IT companies, at the time suffering financial distress, by stimulating their modernisation, thus reducing production costs.  The original 20% payroll levy was replaced by a social security contribution levied on gross revenues. The rate was set at 2.5% and the regime was in force until December 2014.

For IT companies with a large number of employees and a costly payroll, the new regime was positive because it substantially reduced payroll taxation – unless revenues earned were large. For companies with a smaller payroll and considerable revenues the new rules were mostly not so beneficial.

In August 2015, the federal government enacted Law 13 161/2015 rendering the new model optional and raising the rate from 2.5% to 4.5%. Nowadays, this new regime is only applicable to IT companies that really benefit from it. Voluntary adhesion is relatively low. Startups and fintechs, for example, normally do not benefit from the option model of Law 13 161/2015.

Information technology companies are at the core of our world’s innovation and all countries should establish specific taxation models adequate for new corporate structures and businesses thus stimulating investment in this market.

Brazil is yet to design a payroll taxation model that fulfils such goals. The replacement of the 20% payroll taxation with the prevailing 4.5% revenue taxation only applies to a small number of companies and is far from being a proper incentive.

Given this situation, it is crucial for IT companies to examine their payroll taxation in detail to ensure there are no inefficiencies and also to actively propose and discuss new social security taxation models that may effectively bring positive results for this sector and overall for the Brazilian economy.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The president described it as ‘one of the most important cases in the history of our country’; in other news, Portugal established a VAT group regime
Clients are facing increased TP audit scrutiny in Hungary. DLA Piper Hungary is therefore using AI and advanced analytics to augment its advice, the firm’s head of TP says
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett and MinterEllisonRuddWatts were among the firms that advised on the deal
AI will mean fewer entry-level roles in tax but also the emergence of new jobs, according to tax expert Isabella Barreto
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on standout performances by PwC, KPMG and Deloitte across the Asia-Pacific region
The partnership model was looking antiquated even before the UK chancellor’s expected tax raid on LLPs was revealed. An additional tax burden may finally kill it off
The US’s GILTI regime will not be forced upon American multinationals in foreign jurisdictions, Bloomberg has reported; in other news, Ropes & Gray hired two tax partners from Linklaters
APAs should provide a pragmatic means to agree to an arm's-length outcome for an Australian entity and for the ATO, the tax authority said
Overall revenues and average profit per partner also increased in the UK, the ‘big four’ firm revealed
Increasingly complex reporting requirements contributed towards the firm’s growth in tax, it said
Gift this article