Payroll taxation: Is the existing model for technology companies enough?

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Payroll taxation: Is the existing model for technology companies enough?

Sponsored by

pinheirologo.png
Tech payroll

Cristiane I Matsumoto and Mariana Monte Alegre de Paiva of Pinheiro Neto Advogados discuss the shortcomings of Brazil’s payroll taxation regime.

Payroll taxation in Brazil is burdensome because the social security contribution is levied at around 40% over the payroll. Besides the main contribution of 20% which is destined to fund the workers’ retirement, there are several other contributions levied on the same basis for financing other components. The result is that formal employment in Brazil is expensive, which contributes to the informal employment situation.

In August 2011, the Brazilian economy was still recovering from the 2008 global crisis and the federal government implemented measures to reduce the overall tax burden. Among those measures was Provisional Measure 540, which was passed into Law 12 456/2011. This law introduced tax incentives for export companies and the automotive market, as well as a more favourable payroll taxation regime for specific companies, especially for those in the IT sector.

The new regime allegedly favoured IT companies, at the time suffering financial distress, by stimulating their modernisation, thus reducing production costs.  The original 20% payroll levy was replaced by a social security contribution levied on gross revenues. The rate was set at 2.5% and the regime was in force until December 2014.

For IT companies with a large number of employees and a costly payroll, the new regime was positive because it substantially reduced payroll taxation – unless revenues earned were large. For companies with a smaller payroll and considerable revenues the new rules were mostly not so beneficial.

In August 2015, the federal government enacted Law 13 161/2015 rendering the new model optional and raising the rate from 2.5% to 4.5%. Nowadays, this new regime is only applicable to IT companies that really benefit from it. Voluntary adhesion is relatively low. Startups and fintechs, for example, normally do not benefit from the option model of Law 13 161/2015.

Information technology companies are at the core of our world’s innovation and all countries should establish specific taxation models adequate for new corporate structures and businesses thus stimulating investment in this market.

Brazil is yet to design a payroll taxation model that fulfils such goals. The replacement of the 20% payroll taxation with the prevailing 4.5% revenue taxation only applies to a small number of companies and is far from being a proper incentive.

Given this situation, it is crucial for IT companies to examine their payroll taxation in detail to ensure there are no inefficiencies and also to actively propose and discuss new social security taxation models that may effectively bring positive results for this sector and overall for the Brazilian economy.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As ITR data reveals that 2025 saw more than double the amount of private client hires than 2024, it seems firms are jostling for position
The US multinational paid 20% more tax in 2025 than 2024, it said; in other news, more than 25,000 HMRC staff have been upskilled on AI
Belt and Road Initiative countries face tax incentive conundrums due to pillar two, but relatively few countries would seek to scrap the project, ITR has heard
Hany Elnaggar examines how the OECD’s global minimum tax is reshaping the GCC’s investment incentive landscape, shifting the region from rate-based competition toward substance-driven economic positioning
The acquisition of a two-partner practice from Stephenson Harwood means that Charles Russell Speechlys has the largest private client team in Asia, the firm claimed
Complex and constantly shifting rules on global mobility mean ‘the risk is too great’ for staff to work abroad on personal time, EY’s Maureen Flood tells ITR
While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
Gift this article