Payroll taxation: Is the existing model for technology companies enough?

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Payroll taxation: Is the existing model for technology companies enough?

Sponsored by

pinheirologo.png
Tech payroll

Cristiane I Matsumoto and Mariana Monte Alegre de Paiva of Pinheiro Neto Advogados discuss the shortcomings of Brazil’s payroll taxation regime.

Payroll taxation in Brazil is burdensome because the social security contribution is levied at around 40% over the payroll. Besides the main contribution of 20% which is destined to fund the workers’ retirement, there are several other contributions levied on the same basis for financing other components. The result is that formal employment in Brazil is expensive, which contributes to the informal employment situation.

In August 2011, the Brazilian economy was still recovering from the 2008 global crisis and the federal government implemented measures to reduce the overall tax burden. Among those measures was Provisional Measure 540, which was passed into Law 12 456/2011. This law introduced tax incentives for export companies and the automotive market, as well as a more favourable payroll taxation regime for specific companies, especially for those in the IT sector.

The new regime allegedly favoured IT companies, at the time suffering financial distress, by stimulating their modernisation, thus reducing production costs.  The original 20% payroll levy was replaced by a social security contribution levied on gross revenues. The rate was set at 2.5% and the regime was in force until December 2014.

For IT companies with a large number of employees and a costly payroll, the new regime was positive because it substantially reduced payroll taxation – unless revenues earned were large. For companies with a smaller payroll and considerable revenues the new rules were mostly not so beneficial.

In August 2015, the federal government enacted Law 13 161/2015 rendering the new model optional and raising the rate from 2.5% to 4.5%. Nowadays, this new regime is only applicable to IT companies that really benefit from it. Voluntary adhesion is relatively low. Startups and fintechs, for example, normally do not benefit from the option model of Law 13 161/2015.

Information technology companies are at the core of our world’s innovation and all countries should establish specific taxation models adequate for new corporate structures and businesses thus stimulating investment in this market.

Brazil is yet to design a payroll taxation model that fulfils such goals. The replacement of the 20% payroll taxation with the prevailing 4.5% revenue taxation only applies to a small number of companies and is far from being a proper incentive.

Given this situation, it is crucial for IT companies to examine their payroll taxation in detail to ensure there are no inefficiencies and also to actively propose and discuss new social security taxation models that may effectively bring positive results for this sector and overall for the Brazilian economy.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
While the manual should be consulted for any questions around MAPs, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also emphasised that the guidance is ‘not a political commitment’
The landmark Indian Supreme Court judgment redefines GAAR, JAAR and treaty safeguards, rejects protections for indirect transfers and tightens conditions for Mauritius‑based investors claiming DTAA relief
The expansion introduces ‘business-level digital capabilities’ for tax professionals, the US tax agency said
As tax teams face pressure from complex rules and manual processes, adopting clear ownership, clean data and adaptable technology is essential, writes Russell Gammon, chief innovation officer at Tax Systems
Partners want to join Ryan because it’s a disruptor firm, truly global and less bureaucratic, Tom Shave told ITR
If Trump continues to poke the world’s ‘middle powers’ with a stick, he shouldn’t be surprised when they retaliate
The Netherlands-based bank was described as an ‘exemplar of total transparency’; in other news, Kirkland & Ellis made a senior tax hire in Dallas
Zion Adeoye, a tax specialist, had been suspended from the African law firm since October over misconduct allegations
The deal establishes Ryan’s property tax presence in Scotland and expands its ability to serve clients with complex commercial property portfolios across the UK, the firm said
Gift this article