All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Switzerland: The Swiss Federal Council begins Swiss withholding tax reform

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
ib-switzerland.jpg

André Kuhn and Robin King of Deloitte evaluate the Swiss Federal Council’s proposed reforms to the Swiss withholding tax system.

On June 26 2019, the Swiss Federal Council shared its intentions to reform the Swiss withholding tax system. The need for such a reform is twofold: firstly, the reform is aimed at strengthening the Swiss debt capital market. Secondly, it strives to increase tax honesty of Swiss-resident individual investors.

The key parameters established by the Swiss Federal Council in its 1.5 page communication partially piggyback on the ideas presented in an expert board's report early this year.

The Swiss Federal Council mandated the Federal Department of Finance to prepare a consultation draft, which should be available in the autumn, taking into consideration those key parameters:

  1. In line with the expert group report, the Swiss debt capital market should be strengthened by abolishing the withholding tax on interest paid to Swiss corporate and all foreign investors.

  2. Further, tax honesty of Swiss-resident individual investors should be increased by expanding the withholding tax regime to include foreign interest income received by Swiss resident individual investors. The Swiss Federal Council's communication indicates that this should be achieved through the introduction of a paying agent system. Differently to the expert group report, the Swiss Federal Council does not propose an expansion of the paying agent system to foreign dividend income received by Swiss resident individual investors.

  3. Indirect investments in debt instruments (e.g. through an investment fund) should be treated equivalently to direct debt investments.

  4. Transition rules should be established for "too big to fail" instruments.

  5. A legal basis should be created to apply the Swiss withholding tax to substitute interest/dividend payments, which could, for example, arise in relation to securities lending or repo transactions or as part of derivatives or structured products.

However, the Swiss Federal Council for fiscal reasons rejected a more comprehensive reform, which may have included a reduction of the withholding tax rate for Swiss dividends to 15%. Nevertheless, it asked the Federal Department of Finance to examine whether the Swiss equity capital market can be strengthened through amending relevant income tax rules, in particular in the area of the participation exemption.

Finally, the Swiss Federal Council also turned down the idea of abolishing the turnover tax for Swiss securities. However, it indicated that it may agree to excluding Swiss debt instruments from the turnover tax.

The withholding tax reform would significantly strengthen the position of Switzerland as an international finance and treasury centre as it would allow Swiss resident entities to directly enter the debt capital markets via bond issuances without adverse withholding tax consequences. The Swiss Federal Council's communication does not address many of the detailed technical aspects (e.g. in relation to indirect investments or substitute interest/dividend payments) and operational considerations (e.g. details of the paying agent system). Thus, affected parties should watch out for the consultation draft to be published in the autumn to determine how they may be affected in practice and whether any lobbying efforts are needed.

Deloitte

T: +41 58 279 6328

E: akuhn@deloitte.ch

W: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Corporations risk creating administrative obstacles if the pillar two rule is implemented too soon, sources say.
Important dates for the Women in Business Law Awards 2023
The Italian government published plans to levy capital gains tax on cryptocurrency transactions, while Brazil and the UK signed a new tax treaty.
Multinational companies fear the scrutiny of aggressive tax audits may be overstepping the mark on transfer pricing methodology.
Standardisation and outsourcing are two possible solutions amid increasing regulations and scrutiny on transfer pricing, say sources.
Inaugural awards announces winners
The UN’s decision to seek a leadership role in global tax policy could be a crucial turning point but won’t be the end of the OECD, say tax experts.
The UN may be set to assume a global role in tax policy that would rival the OECD, while automakers lobby the US to change its tax rules on Chinese materials.
Companies including Valentino and EveryMatrix say the early adoption of EU public CbCR rules could boost transparency of local and foreign MNEs, despite the short notice.
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2023 ITR Tax Awards in Asia-Pacific, Europe Middle East & Africa, and the Americas.