All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Luxembourg: Luxembourg adopts exit tax rules aligned with ATAD 1

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
luxembourg.jpg

The Luxembourg Parliament transposed the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive 1 (ATAD 1) into Luxembourg legislation on December 21 2018

The Luxembourg Parliament transposed the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive 1 (ATAD 1) into Luxembourg legislation on December 21 2018. One of the measures of ATAD I is a requirement that EU member states adopt exit tax provisions that will apply (at the latest) from January 1 2020 (notably, exit taxation is not one of the recommendations under the OECD BEPS project but was initiated by the European Commission).

Exit tax is designed to prevent taxpayers from avoiding tax by transferring residence, activities or assets out of a country without the exit tax being imposed on deemed unrealised capital gains upon this transfer.

Prior to implementing the ATAD 1 measures, Luxembourg already had exit taxation rules, but those rules were revised to bring them in line with ATAD 1.

Transfers to Luxembourg

Articles 35 and 43 of the Income Tax Law (ITL), which already broadly addresses transfers to Luxembourg, will be amended to specifically cover a transfer of tax residence, the activities of a permanent establishment (PE) and assets from another country to Luxembourg.

With respect to such transfers, Luxembourg will use the value of the assets as determined by the departure state for tax purposes unless that value is not comparable to the fair market value as defined in the ITL. The acquisition date of the assets should correspond to the historical acquisition date, not the transfer date. This rule is designed to achieve the symmetry criterion introduced by ATAD 1, i.e. the same valuation of transferred assets between the country of origin and the country of destination.

Although the scope of the exit tax rules in ATAD 1 is limited to transfers between two EU member states, the modified Articles 35 and 43 of the ITL encompass transfers from any jurisdiction to Luxembourg.

Transfers out of Luxembourg

The scope of Article 38 of the ITL relating to transfers out of Luxembourg has been extended to ensure that, in specific cases, taxpayers in Luxembourg are subject to tax on the transfer of assets (either part of an enterprise, a PE or isolated assets as part of the net invested assets) from Luxembourg to any other jurisdiction in an amount equal to the fair market value of the transferred assets at the date of exit less their tax value.

Paragraph 127 of the General Tax Law details the mechanism for deferring the payment of exit tax covered by Article 38 of the ITL. The possibility for indefinite deferral of payment of the tax liability will be abolished on January 1 2020. Instead, the payment of Luxembourg tax arising on a transfer of assets/residence outside the country may be made in instalments over five years only in cases where the transfer is made to a country within the EU or the European Economic Area (in line with ATAD 1). However, where instalment payments are made, Luxembourg has opted not to impose interest on the deferred payments or to require a guarantee to benefit from the deferral.

Although some may argue that exit tax rules may be incompatible with the fundamental EU principle of freedom of establishment, harmonising rules at the level of each member state's domestic law should facilitate the overall tax harmonisation process at the EU level. However, it may be questionable whether allowing each member state to implement exit taxation using various options could impede that harmonisation goal.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Several tax chiefs shared their administrations’ latest digital identity tracking systems and other tax technologies at the OECD’s annual meeting of authorities.
Businesses welcome the UK’s decision to scrap the IR35 reforms but are not happy about the time and money they have wasted to date.
Energy ministers agreed on regulations including a windfall tax on fossil fuel companies to address high gas prices at an extraordinary Council meeting on September 30.
The European Parliament raises concerns over unanimity in voting on pillar two, while protests break out over tax reform in Colombia.
Ramesh Khaitan speaks to reporter Siqalane Taho about tax morality, transfer pricing regulations, Indian tax developments, and the OECD’s two-pillar solution.
Join ITR and KPMG China at 10am BST on October 19 as they discuss the personal, employment, and corporate tax-related implications of employees working from overseas.
Tricentis and Boehringer Ingelheim, along with a European Commission TP specialist, criticised the complexity of pillar one rules and their scope at an ITR event.
Speakers at ITR’s Managing Tax Disputes Summit said taxpayers can still face lengthy TP audits, despite strong documentation preparation
Gig economy companies in New Zealand will need to fully account and become liable for the goods and services tax of underlying suppliers on their platforms, under new proposals.
Join ITR and Thomson Reuters at 2pm (UAE) / 11am (UK) on October 13 as they discuss how businesses can prepare for Tax Administration 3.0 and future-proof against changes such as e-invoicing and increasing digitisation.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree