International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The transfer pricing implications of the Italian regional tax on productive activities

The provincial tax court of Reggio Emilia has issued ruling No 510/03/14 relating to the Italian regional tax on productive activities (IRAP).

The provincial tax court of Reggio Emilia has issued ruling No 510/03/14 relating to the Italian regional tax on productive activities (IRAP).

Starting with the 2008 tax period (as a consequence of the abrogation of article 11-bis of legislative decree No 446/97) the taxable IRAP base is to be determined in accordance with the principle of direct derivation from financial statement results, whereas (in accordance with paragraph 2 of the above abrogated article 11-bis, for IRAP purposes) tax adjustments for IReS (corporate income tax, hereinafter) purposes, should have been taken into consideration, including, therefore, any asset items provided under article 110, paragraph 7 of the TUIR (Italian Income Tax Code, which sets forth Italian transfer pricing rules.

Separating the taxable IRAP base from the rules provided, for direct tax determination, caused the regulation under examination to become irrelevant for IRAP purposes, giving relevance instead to the amount earmarked under the profit and loss account for intercompany earnings.

It is nonetheless worth noting that, during audits, the tax authorities frequently deemed transfer pricing adjustments valid even for IRAP purposes.

In order to clarify the said interpretative doubt, the 2014 stability law (paragraph 281 of law No 147/2013) extended such rules, retroactively, for the determination of the IRAP taxable base deriving from the application of the transfer pricing regime, also for tax periods subsequent to the one in progress as from December 31 2007.

However, the Provincial Tax Court of Reggio Emilia, through ruling No 510/03/14 of November 19 2014, established that the above new regulation will be strictly applicable as of 2014, while denying its retroactive effect, in view of its being a “child born of cash needs”, in addition to the fact that it is entirely detrimental to such principles contained in the Taxpayer’s Charter and, in particular, to article 1, paragraph 2 of law No 212/2000, which imposes an “authentic interpretation” qualification provision.

To further endorse the ruling, the judges referred to the Supreme Court’s most recent positions on the said issue.

In particular, with regard to the retroactive effects of the law, the Supreme Court’s ruling No. 14798/2014 provided clarifications on the restrictions pertaining to the issuing of retroactive norms, also in connection with the afore-stated authentic interpretation, generally identifying such restrictions with the need to safeguard principles, rights and assets that are constitutionally relevant as they represent “imperative motivations of a general interest”.

In particular, the Provincial Tax Commission of Reggio Emilia concluded by asserting how the said norm “may only be deemed applicable in the future”, or rather, for tax years subsequent to 2013, given that, if the norm were to be deemed applicable to tax years before 2014, it would “violate the constitutional principle of entrustment and of good faith in Tax Authorities-taxpayer relations” by having a bearing, without “imperative motivations of a general interest”.

Therefore, the norm is to be construed, if its constitutional lawfulness is to be preserved, as if its applicability were provided strictly for tax years subsequent to 2013.

Valente Associati GEB Partners

Viale Bianca Maria, 45

20122 Milan, Italy

Managing Partner: Piergiorgio Valente

Tel: +39 02 7626131

Fax: +39 02 76001091



more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Shareholders are set to vote on whether the asset management firm will adopt public CbCR, amid claims of tax avoidance.
US lawmakers averted a default on debt by approving the Fiscal Responsibility Act, but this deal may consolidate the Biden tax reforms rather than undermine them.
In a letter to the Australian Senate, the firm has provided the names of all 67 staff who received confidential emails but has not released them publicly.
David Pickstone and Anastasia Nourescu of Stewarts review the facts and implications of Ørsted’s appeal at the Upper Tribunal.
The Internal Revenue Service will lose the funding as part of the US debt limit deal, while Amazon UK reaps the benefits of the 130% ‘super-deduction’.
The European Commission wanted to make an example of US companies like Apple, but its crusade against ‘sweetheart’ tax rulings may be derailed at the CJEU.
The OECD has announced that a TP training programme is about to conclude in West Africa, a region that has been plagued by mispricing activities for a number of years.
Richard Murphy and Andrew Baker make the case for tax transparency as a public good and how key principles should lead to a better tax system.
‘Go on leave, effective immediately’, PwC has told nine partners in the latest development in the firm’s ongoing tax scandal.
The forum heard that VAT professionals are struggling under new pressures to validate transactions and catch fraud, responsibilities that they say should lie with governments.