All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

The transfer pricing implications of the Italian regional tax on productive activities

The provincial tax court of Reggio Emilia has issued ruling No 510/03/14 relating to the Italian regional tax on productive activities (IRAP).

The provincial tax court of Reggio Emilia has issued ruling No 510/03/14 relating to the Italian regional tax on productive activities (IRAP).

Starting with the 2008 tax period (as a consequence of the abrogation of article 11-bis of legislative decree No 446/97) the taxable IRAP base is to be determined in accordance with the principle of direct derivation from financial statement results, whereas (in accordance with paragraph 2 of the above abrogated article 11-bis, for IRAP purposes) tax adjustments for IReS (corporate income tax, hereinafter) purposes, should have been taken into consideration, including, therefore, any asset items provided under article 110, paragraph 7 of the TUIR (Italian Income Tax Code, which sets forth Italian transfer pricing rules.

Separating the taxable IRAP base from the rules provided, for direct tax determination, caused the regulation under examination to become irrelevant for IRAP purposes, giving relevance instead to the amount earmarked under the profit and loss account for intercompany earnings.

It is nonetheless worth noting that, during audits, the tax authorities frequently deemed transfer pricing adjustments valid even for IRAP purposes.

In order to clarify the said interpretative doubt, the 2014 stability law (paragraph 281 of law No 147/2013) extended such rules, retroactively, for the determination of the IRAP taxable base deriving from the application of the transfer pricing regime, also for tax periods subsequent to the one in progress as from December 31 2007.

However, the Provincial Tax Court of Reggio Emilia, through ruling No 510/03/14 of November 19 2014, established that the above new regulation will be strictly applicable as of 2014, while denying its retroactive effect, in view of its being a “child born of cash needs”, in addition to the fact that it is entirely detrimental to such principles contained in the Taxpayer’s Charter and, in particular, to article 1, paragraph 2 of law No 212/2000, which imposes an “authentic interpretation” qualification provision.

To further endorse the ruling, the judges referred to the Supreme Court’s most recent positions on the said issue.

In particular, with regard to the retroactive effects of the law, the Supreme Court’s ruling No. 14798/2014 provided clarifications on the restrictions pertaining to the issuing of retroactive norms, also in connection with the afore-stated authentic interpretation, generally identifying such restrictions with the need to safeguard principles, rights and assets that are constitutionally relevant as they represent “imperative motivations of a general interest”.

In particular, the Provincial Tax Commission of Reggio Emilia concluded by asserting how the said norm “may only be deemed applicable in the future”, or rather, for tax years subsequent to 2013, given that, if the norm were to be deemed applicable to tax years before 2014, it would “violate the constitutional principle of entrustment and of good faith in Tax Authorities-taxpayer relations” by having a bearing, without “imperative motivations of a general interest”.

Therefore, the norm is to be construed, if its constitutional lawfulness is to be preserved, as if its applicability were provided strictly for tax years subsequent to 2013.

Valente Associati GEB Partners

Viale Bianca Maria, 45

20122 Milan, Italy

Managing Partner: Piergiorgio Valente

Tel: +39 02 7626131

Fax: +39 02 76001091



more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The companies have criticised proposals for the gig economy, while the UK and EU VAT gaps have fallen in percentage terms, and ITR speaks to a European Commission adviser about its VAT reforms.
Corporations risk creating administrative obstacles if the pillar two rule is implemented too soon, sources say.
Important dates for the Women in Business Law Awards 2023
The Italian government published plans to levy capital gains tax on cryptocurrency transactions, while Brazil and the UK signed a new tax treaty.
Multinational companies fear the scrutiny of aggressive tax audits may be overstepping the mark on transfer pricing methodology.
Standardisation and outsourcing are two possible solutions amid increasing regulations and scrutiny on transfer pricing, say sources.
Inaugural awards announces winners
The UN’s decision to seek a leadership role in global tax policy could be a crucial turning point but won’t be the end of the OECD, say tax experts.
The UN may be set to assume a global role in tax policy that would rival the OECD, while automakers lobby the US to change its tax rules on Chinese materials.
Companies including Valentino and EveryMatrix say the early adoption of EU public CbCR rules could boost transparency of local and foreign MNEs, despite the short notice.