International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Pascal Saint-Amans pre-empts criticism of final OECD BEPS guidance

Pascal Saint-Amans, director of the OECD’s Centre for Tax Policy and Administration, has pre-empted criticism of the final BEPS package of measures released today.

The final package has been published on the OECD's website todayand will be presented at the G20 meeting in Peru later this week.

The tax chief expects non-governmental organisations (NGO) to be the biggest critics of the OECD’s efforts but thinks taxpayers will have some concerns as well.

“NGOs will say that nothing has happened,” said Saint-Amans in a pre-BEPS release interview with TPWeek. “Whatever we do, that will be the complaint.”

He said NGO criticism is about keeping tax avoidance high on their tax campaign agendas.

He also thinks the OECD may be criticised for not going far enough towards formulary apportionment (FA).

FA is an alternative to the arm’s-length principle that would see developing countries, which have a bigger emphasis on people functions over intellectual property, take a larger share of tax profits.

Saint-Amans said, in response, that the BEPS guidance is a consensus of all countries involved, including non-OECD members such as India, China and Brazil.

Without this agreement, the guidance could not have been finalised because the countries that have reached consensus (OECD members and those in the G20) will go on to implement BEPS measures in their tax regimes.

Multinational enterprises are likely to be concerned, and critical, that the recommendations will create uncertainty.

“My response to that is “Yes, it’s not untrue”.”

Uncertainty is likely, for instance, when governments will need to interpret the guidance to apply it to national legislation. This could create discrepancies and differences in different countries, particularly those where English is not the first language.

“But how do you measure that in a dynamic approach? What would have happened without this project? There is more consensus now than there was years ago.”

However, in subsequent interviews with taxpayers, there is a concern that the uncertainties connected to this guidance will develop further over time and the OECD will not be able to keep pace with international business in order to solve them.

"I think what we will find over time is that, due to the emphasis on combatting the perceived abuses of today, there will be a lack of balance in the approaches that will result, over time, in modifications to many of the recommendations made [in the final guidance]," said Mike Patton, partner, DLA Piper, Los Angeles.

Saint-Amans used Brazil, India and China as an example, explaining that, because of the work on the BEPS action plan, there are now mutual agreement processes in place in these countries.

“But what about the praise?” Saint-Amans asked. “People were sceptical of our ability to deliver anything.”

He added that now the guidance is finalised, the next step will be advising on implementation and monitoring how the guidance is implemented, with an emphasis on tax administrations.

To see how taxpayers and their advisers have reacted, internationally, view our follow-up content by clicking here.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.
Caroline Setliffe and Ben Shem-Tov of Eversheds Sutherland give an overview of the US transfer pricing penalty regime and UK diverted profits tax considerations for multinational companies.
The result follows what EY said was one of the most successful years in the firm’s history.