Taxpayers’ concern about commercial sensitivity discussed at OECD public consultation on transfer pricing

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Taxpayers’ concern about commercial sensitivity discussed at OECD public consultation on transfer pricing

Commercial sensitivity has been the focus of the morning’s discussion at the OECD’s Public Consultation on Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting (CbCR).

Taxpayers around the table are concerned that unnecessary information will be demanded that could then be misused and made public to competitors.

The BEPS documentation requirement generating the most concern is the master file, which taxpayers feel asks for unnecessary and irrelevant information such as number of employees, business models and profit splits.

 “The information from each MNC will not be identical and therefore can be construed differently,” said Catherine Schultz of the National Foreign Trade Council. “This could result in the information provided being looked at negatively.” Eurodad, a non-government organisation for developing countries, stressed the need to define commercial sensitivity and to ensure that there is no confusion being made with trade secrets.

“We can’t keep the public in the dark. The information being presented is in the public interest,” The Eurodad spokeswoman said. She added that there is too much emphasis on confidentiality, which is facilitating tax evasion in developing countries.

While much was said about the topic of commercial sensitivity it is clear that it will be some time before the OECD can expect unanimous approval.

Differences were emphasised between something that is commercially sensitive and data that is confidential.

The Eurodad spokeswoman said that profit shifting in general is commercially sensitive but this information is usually in the public interest and should not be confused when defining what would be commercially confidential in any CbCR guidelines.





more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
The US president also unveiled a new 50% levy on copper imports; in other news, a UK wealth tax proposal has been criticised by the Institute for Fiscal Studies
Wim Wuyts, who had been head of the specialist tax network since 2017, is moving on to a new role with WTS’s Belgian member firm
MNEs are increasingly using algorithmic tools in TP. Sahasranshu Dash argues that data ethics should therefore plug directly into the TP design process
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales also queried whether HMRC resources could be better spent scrutinising larger entities
Grant Thornton’s Austria tax head likens his practice to an escape room, shares his football coaching ambitions, and explains why tax is cool
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 EMEA Tax Awards
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Asia-Pacific Tax Awards
The fates of pillars one and two hang in the balance after the US successfully threw its weight around in G7 and Canadian negotiations
Gift this article