Taxpayers’ concern about commercial sensitivity discussed at OECD public consultation on transfer pricing

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Taxpayers’ concern about commercial sensitivity discussed at OECD public consultation on transfer pricing

Commercial sensitivity has been the focus of the morning’s discussion at the OECD’s Public Consultation on Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting (CbCR).

Taxpayers around the table are concerned that unnecessary information will be demanded that could then be misused and made public to competitors.

The BEPS documentation requirement generating the most concern is the master file, which taxpayers feel asks for unnecessary and irrelevant information such as number of employees, business models and profit splits.

 “The information from each MNC will not be identical and therefore can be construed differently,” said Catherine Schultz of the National Foreign Trade Council. “This could result in the information provided being looked at negatively.” Eurodad, a non-government organisation for developing countries, stressed the need to define commercial sensitivity and to ensure that there is no confusion being made with trade secrets.

“We can’t keep the public in the dark. The information being presented is in the public interest,” The Eurodad spokeswoman said. She added that there is too much emphasis on confidentiality, which is facilitating tax evasion in developing countries.

While much was said about the topic of commercial sensitivity it is clear that it will be some time before the OECD can expect unanimous approval.

Differences were emphasised between something that is commercially sensitive and data that is confidential.

The Eurodad spokeswoman said that profit shifting in general is commercially sensitive but this information is usually in the public interest and should not be confused when defining what would be commercially confidential in any CbCR guidelines.





more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Countries which care about fair taxation of tech multinationals and equitable global distribution of wealth should back the UN’s tax framework, writes economist Abdelmalek Riad
The cuts disproportionately affected staff in certain positions, the report also found; in other news, MHA announced the €24m acquisition of Baker Tilly South East Europe
The plan aims to improve the efficiency, transparency, and effectiveness of direct tax administration in India
Meanwhile, South Africa’s finance minister has accepted a court decision on suspending a VAT increase and US President Donald Trump mulls a 100% tariff on foreign films
Jaime Carey speaks about the benefits of his tax background, DEI values, the use of AI for a smarter legal practice, and other priorities that will define his presidency
Historically low levels of attrition over consecutive years made a ‘difficult decision’ necessary, PwC has reportedly said
WTS Global is also vetting new potential member firms in Algeria, Cote D’Ivoire and Benin, Kelly Mgbor tells ITR in an exclusive interview
The scope of qualifying pillar two tax credits could reportedly be broadened; in other news, hundreds of IRS appeals staff are to resign
For many taxpayers, the prospect of long-term certainty that a bilateral APA offers can override concerns about time, cost and confidentiality
Levine, who served under the Joe Biden administration, led the US’s negotiations on the OECD’s two-pillar solution
Gift this article