International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Taxpayers’ concern about commercial sensitivity discussed at OECD public consultation on transfer pricing

Commercial sensitivity has been the focus of the morning’s discussion at the OECD’s Public Consultation on Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting (CbCR).

Taxpayers around the table are concerned that unnecessary information will be demanded that could then be misused and made public to competitors.

The BEPS documentation requirement generating the most concern is the master file, which taxpayers feel asks for unnecessary and irrelevant information such as number of employees, business models and profit splits.

 “The information from each MNC will not be identical and therefore can be construed differently,” said Catherine Schultz of the National Foreign Trade Council. “This could result in the information provided being looked at negatively.” Eurodad, a non-government organisation for developing countries, stressed the need to define commercial sensitivity and to ensure that there is no confusion being made with trade secrets.

“We can’t keep the public in the dark. The information being presented is in the public interest,” The Eurodad spokeswoman said. She added that there is too much emphasis on confidentiality, which is facilitating tax evasion in developing countries.

While much was said about the topic of commercial sensitivity it is clear that it will be some time before the OECD can expect unanimous approval.

Differences were emphasised between something that is commercially sensitive and data that is confidential.

The Eurodad spokeswoman said that profit shifting in general is commercially sensitive but this information is usually in the public interest and should not be confused when defining what would be commercially confidential in any CbCR guidelines.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023
An intense period of lobbying and persuasion is under way as the UN secretary-general’s report on the future of international tax cooperation begins to take shape. Ralph Cunningham reports.
Fresh details of the European Commission’s state aid case against Amazon emerge, while a pension fund is suing Amgen over its tax dispute with the Internal Revenue Service.