Luxembourg releases paper on tax transparency amid “Lux leaks” controversy

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Luxembourg releases paper on tax transparency amid “Lux leaks” controversy

On December 10 the Luxembourg Ministry of Finance released proposals relating to tax transparency and advance rulings. This move comes as no surprise in the light of the recent “Lux leaks” scandal and appears to be a strategic attempt at advertising Luxembourg’s willingness to fight tax evasion.

The position paper outlines that:

· A specific provision would be added to the tax law regarding transfer pricing documentation;

· From 2015, the tax administration would provide an annual report of all tax ruling issues for the year;

· The income tax law of Luxembourg would be modified to explicitly state that profit of related-party enterprises would be determined under an arm’s-length standard and then taxed according to OECD principles; and

· Requests for corporate tax rulings, filed with the tax office, would have to be submitted to the newly established supervisory commission (commission des decisions anticipées) which is authorised to issue a binding opinion on which the tax office’s advance ruling would be based.

According to the paper, these legislative changes, which are already considered administrative practice by the Luxembourg tax office, would be codified into law.

Perfect timing

There is no denying that the proposals were released in response to the “Lux leaks” scandal.

“The form and timing of the release was expected in the context of the recent “Lux leaks”. It is a move to clarify Luxembourg’s position that there should be more transparency around rulings,” said Keith O’Donnell of Atoz.

The proposals will come as no surprise to taxpayers who were already expecting significant changes to improve tax transparency in the country. The release of the proposals appears to be more of a publicity stunt to reassure the international tax community that Luxembourg is fully committed to tackling the fight against base erosion and profit shifting.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Barrister Setu Kamal and policy guru Dan Neidle have clashed over the former’s legal action against Google, described as ‘bonkers’ by Neidle
Authors from Khaitan & Co evaluate the recent CBDT notification, whereby legacy investments made by investors continue to be exempt from the applicability of GAAR
Dual-qualified corporate tax specialist Christoph Schimmer joins the firm after stints at Deloitte, Cerha Hempel and DLA Piper
Geopolitical rivalry is reshaping global tax cooperation, as the OECD’s minimum tax framework fragments and the EU grapples with the ensuing legal fallout
LED Taxand’s partner tells ITR about entrepreneurial inspirations, the importance of people skills, and what makes tax cool
Shiny new offices like Ryan’s in London Bridge aren’t just a cost – they signal that a firm is willing to align with its clients’ interests
Darren Graves will succeed Richard Houston, who is set to lead Deloitte EMEA; in other news, Morgan Lewis hired a three-partner tax team in New York
India also signed its first-ever bilateral APAs with France, Ireland, Indonesia and Sweden last year, the CBDT revealed
Chile’s revamped GAAR marks a shift toward structural scrutiny, pushing MNEs to strengthen tax governance, economic substance and compliance strategies
New reforms represent the most seismic shift in Canadian TP legislation since its enactment and a clear inflection point for MNEs, ITR has heard
Gift this article