Luxembourg releases paper on tax transparency amid “Lux leaks” controversy

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Luxembourg releases paper on tax transparency amid “Lux leaks” controversy

On December 10 the Luxembourg Ministry of Finance released proposals relating to tax transparency and advance rulings. This move comes as no surprise in the light of the recent “Lux leaks” scandal and appears to be a strategic attempt at advertising Luxembourg’s willingness to fight tax evasion.

The position paper outlines that:

· A specific provision would be added to the tax law regarding transfer pricing documentation;

· From 2015, the tax administration would provide an annual report of all tax ruling issues for the year;

· The income tax law of Luxembourg would be modified to explicitly state that profit of related-party enterprises would be determined under an arm’s-length standard and then taxed according to OECD principles; and

· Requests for corporate tax rulings, filed with the tax office, would have to be submitted to the newly established supervisory commission (commission des decisions anticipées) which is authorised to issue a binding opinion on which the tax office’s advance ruling would be based.

According to the paper, these legislative changes, which are already considered administrative practice by the Luxembourg tax office, would be codified into law.

Perfect timing

There is no denying that the proposals were released in response to the “Lux leaks” scandal.

“The form and timing of the release was expected in the context of the recent “Lux leaks”. It is a move to clarify Luxembourg’s position that there should be more transparency around rulings,” said Keith O’Donnell of Atoz.

The proposals will come as no surprise to taxpayers who were already expecting significant changes to improve tax transparency in the country. The release of the proposals appears to be more of a publicity stunt to reassure the international tax community that Luxembourg is fully committed to tackling the fight against base erosion and profit shifting.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Elsewhere, the UAE’s tax office has issued an update on registration penalties and two firms have been busy making lateral hires
The case sits within a context of Brazil signalling that it is replacing informal discretion and ambiguity with structures that reward analytical rigour, one expert tells ITR
Jeff Soar lifts the lid on WTS UK’s ambitious recruitment plans, the firm's positioning against the big four, and why tax is the perfect profession for AI
The move reinforces Milan’s role as a key European hub for international business, the firm said
Australia’s government has also announced that it will implement the pillar two side-by-side agreement
Sara Morgan is due to join Joseph Hage Aaronson & Bremen as a partner in London, ITR understands
The newly combined tax team has already worked on thousands of joint client matters, leaders from McDermott Will & Schulte tell ITR
As AI becomes increasingly intuitive and idiot-proof, its tax applicability is becoming impossible to overstate
New data on public CbCR showed uneven adoption, as Singapore advanced pillar two compliance and firms expanded their tax capabilities
Gift this article