Luxembourg releases paper on tax transparency amid “Lux leaks” controversy

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Luxembourg releases paper on tax transparency amid “Lux leaks” controversy

On December 10 the Luxembourg Ministry of Finance released proposals relating to tax transparency and advance rulings. This move comes as no surprise in the light of the recent “Lux leaks” scandal and appears to be a strategic attempt at advertising Luxembourg’s willingness to fight tax evasion.

The position paper outlines that:

· A specific provision would be added to the tax law regarding transfer pricing documentation;

· From 2015, the tax administration would provide an annual report of all tax ruling issues for the year;

· The income tax law of Luxembourg would be modified to explicitly state that profit of related-party enterprises would be determined under an arm’s-length standard and then taxed according to OECD principles; and

· Requests for corporate tax rulings, filed with the tax office, would have to be submitted to the newly established supervisory commission (commission des decisions anticipées) which is authorised to issue a binding opinion on which the tax office’s advance ruling would be based.

According to the paper, these legislative changes, which are already considered administrative practice by the Luxembourg tax office, would be codified into law.

Perfect timing

There is no denying that the proposals were released in response to the “Lux leaks” scandal.

“The form and timing of the release was expected in the context of the recent “Lux leaks”. It is a move to clarify Luxembourg’s position that there should be more transparency around rulings,” said Keith O’Donnell of Atoz.

The proposals will come as no surprise to taxpayers who were already expecting significant changes to improve tax transparency in the country. The release of the proposals appears to be more of a publicity stunt to reassure the international tax community that Luxembourg is fully committed to tackling the fight against base erosion and profit shifting.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
While the manual should be consulted for any questions around MAPs, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also emphasised that the guidance is ‘not a political commitment’
The landmark Indian Supreme Court judgment redefines GAAR, JAAR and treaty safeguards, rejects protections for indirect transfers and tightens conditions for Mauritius‑based investors claiming DTAA relief
The expansion introduces ‘business-level digital capabilities’ for tax professionals, the US tax agency said
As tax teams face pressure from complex rules and manual processes, adopting clear ownership, clean data and adaptable technology is essential, writes Russell Gammon, chief innovation officer at Tax Systems
Partners want to join Ryan because it’s a disruptor firm, truly global and less bureaucratic, Tom Shave told ITR
If Trump continues to poke the world’s ‘middle powers’ with a stick, he shouldn’t be surprised when they retaliate
Gift this article