International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Country by country reporting and the changing landscape

The OECD issued a draft revised chapter V of the OECD guidelines on documentation on January 30 2014. The emphasis is now on both transfer pricing enquiry and on risk assessment. One of the key changes to help tax authorities with risk assessment is the introduction of guidance on country-by-country reporting (CBCR).

In the wake of the economic crises, companies have come under increasing scrutiny as to whether they are paying their fair share of taxes.

National tax laws are perceived to have failed to keep pace with the rapid rise of globalisation. Pressure is mounting for governments to alter the tax reporting landscape, adapt to the changing environment and provide greater transparency around corporate tax. One important challenge faced by tax administrations is their inability to capture the “big picture view” of taxpayers’ global value chains.

The revised draft chapter V includes a CBCR reporting template as Annex III. The draft indicates that the template "is to be provided to tax administrations as part of the global transfer pricing master file". What is interesting is that there is also an Annex which lists the information that is recommended for inclusion in the master file which is fairly comprehensive, and yet the stated purpose of the CBCR template is risk assessment. At the risk assessment stage, tax authorities do not necessarily require all the information in the master file and so this may not be an appropriate place for CBCR. The OECD has asked for views on whether this should be part of the master file or a separate document; in our view they should be clearly separated.

When implemented, CBCR reporting will require multinational companies to disclose key business and financial information for each country in which they operate.

The draft template includes:

· Revenues;

· Earnings before tax;

· Income tax paid;

· Capital and accumulated earnings;

· Employee details; and

· Specific information on intra-group payments, such as management fees and royalties.

Preparing and gathering such information may not necessarily be the remit a company’s tax department and some businesses consider this the responsibility of their financial reporting teams.

The OECD has asked for comments on whether to use a "bottom-up" or "top-down" approach to preparation and other questions on the methods of calculation. These are perhaps points that should be addressed by both financial reporting and transfer pricing specialists because the key questions here will be "how easy is the CBCR schedule to prepare?" and then "how meaningful will it be as a risk-assessment tool?".

In some businesses, such as those in the financial services and extractive industries sectors, there has already been a requirement for a certain level of CBCR to enhance transparency.

Within the financial sector, companies classified as credit institutions or investment firms are required to disclose information on income, tax paid as well as other economic measures. This information may therefore be readily available.

The OECD has requested comments from interested parties by Sunday February 23 2014.

Article by Zakariya Modan, associate (, Lorna Smith, associate director, ( and Wendy Nicholls, head of transfer pricing (, Grant Thornton UK.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023