All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Siemens on how transfer pricing in Asia can be different

Li Ying, tax director and transfer pricing for North East Asia at Siemens, and one of the speakers at International Tax Review’s Asia Tax Forum in Singapore in May, talks about the issues that are taking up her time, how transfer pricing in Asia Pacific can be different to the rest of the world and the one change that would make her life easier.

International Tax Review (ITR): Which countries in the part of the Asia Pacific region that you cover are getting your attention at the moment?

Li Ying (LY): I am only responsible for Greater China and Mongolia. Although India is not within my scope, I always keep a keen eye on Indian TP developments. There's no doubt that Indian TP enforcement is distinctive, for example, in the use of the arithmetic mean instead of interquartile range; specific domestic transactions (SDT); and the assessment of marketing intangibles. It's apparent that developing countries, including China,are taking leverage of TP administration experiences from India.

ITR: What are the particular transfer pricing issues you are having to deal with there?

LY: Intangibles (including royalty) and financial transactions are getting more and more attention. Apart from that, China’s tax authority is also exploring the anti-avoidance of offshore share transfers.

ITR: Transfer pricing compliance is a hot topic worldwide now. Has anything changed in how tax authorities deal with this?

LY: In addition to the information collected through traditional TP compliance channels (for example, TP returns and TP documentation reports), tax authorities are getting their information from other sources, including information exchange with treaty partners, Customs offices and banks where taxpayers get their loans. Moreover, for key taxpayers, the tax authorities follow their financial news on public media and the company's own websites. It is becoming more difficult to hide anything from the tax authorities.

At the same time, the tax authorities are also aware that TP compliance is also a huge burden for themselves in terms of human resources and money. Therefore, they are also keen to develop simplified measures for non-significant transactions by introducing safe harbours, for example.

ITR: Asia Pacific countries such as China and India take a different approach to the OECD on some aspects of transfer pricing. Is this a serious problem for multinationals or just something you have to get used to when doing business?

LY: It's perfectly true that China and India are having their own voices in some aspects of TP practices. As an MNE, we factually feel the pain. It is a serious problem but it is only one of the risks that management balance when making investment decisions to those countries. Sometimes double taxation is the price that an MNE must pay in order to enter a market.

The best way to solve it is to have a BAPA (bilateral advance pricing agreement). However, considering the time cost, financial cost, the risk of divulgence, and the short lifetime of a BAPA in A dynamic economy, some MNEs simply choose to take the double taxation directly.

ITR: Anti-avoidance rules, both statutory and non-statutory, have also become a hot tax topic worldwide recently. Are such rules in this region easy to understand and simple to comply with?

LY: China and India are competing with each other for the most "difficult, ambiguous, and uncertain TP regime in Asia". Comments from practitioners indicate that TP rules are short, obscure and subject to various unpredictable applications across the country. They are definitely hard to understand and difficult to comply with.

ITR: If one change to transfer pricing rules in any part of Asia would help you in your role, what would it be?

LY: Introducing safe harbours for simple functions (like contract manufacturing, routine distributors, and contract R&D service providers) to reduce uncertainties for taxpayers doing business in Asia.

You can find more details about International Tax Review’s Asia Tax Forum, including the agenda and line-up of top speakers, here.

Save $200 by signing up to attend the forum here



More from across our site

This week European Commission officials consider legal loopholes to secure minimum corporate taxation, while Cisco and Microsoft shareholders call for tax transparency.
The fast-food company’s tax settlement with French authorities strengthens the need for businesses to review their TP arrangements and documentation.
The full ALP model will be adopted through a new TP regime, which is set to boost the country’s investments and tax certainty.
Tax professionals have called on the UK government to reconsider its online sales tax as it would affect the economy at the worst time.
Tax professionals have called on companies to act urgently to meet e-invoicing compliance targets as the EU plans to ramp up digitisation.
In the wake of India’s ambitious 25-year plan for economic growth, ITR has partnered with leading tax commentators to discuss what the future will look like for India and for the rest of the world.
But experts cast doubt on HMRC's data and believe COVID-19 would have increased the revenue shortfall.
EY’s plan to separate its auditing and consulting businesses might lessen scrutiny from global regulators, but the brand identity could suffer, say sources.
Multinationals are asking world leaders to put a scale on carbon pricing to tackle climate change at the 48th G7 summit in Germany, from June 26 to 28.
The state secretary told the French press that the country continues to oppose pillar two’s global minimum tax rate following an Ecofin meeting last week.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree