The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court (SCA) rendered a landmark decision on March 4 2013, explains Kennet Pettersson of Ernst & Young. The main dispute concerned location savings and whether such benefits could be allocated to a foreign low cost subsidiary. Though the SCA’s decision rejected the locations savings which were sought to be applied in the case at hand, the decision clearly recognises location savings and the allocation of these benefits to a low cost subsidiary provided similar functions were conducted in Finland before the reorganisation and benefits availed can be clearly crystallised.
Unlock this content.
The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
After joining Milbank from Akin Gump, the fund tax specialist discusses sponsor demand, practice building, and the tax challenges facing asset managers
New research, which suggests LLMs can silently corrupt complex documents, should alert tax and legal teams relying on AI to handle iterative drafting and compliance workflows
The firm has hired a team of private client lawyers from Withers to launch in New York and Connecticut, though ITR analysis suggests it faces stiff competition