The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court (SCA) rendered a landmark decision on March 4 2013, explains Kennet Pettersson of Ernst & Young. The main dispute concerned location savings and whether such benefits could be allocated to a foreign low cost subsidiary. Though the SCA’s decision rejected the locations savings which were sought to be applied in the case at hand, the decision clearly recognises location savings and the allocation of these benefits to a low cost subsidiary provided similar functions were conducted in Finland before the reorganisation and benefits availed can be clearly crystallised.
Unlock this content.
The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.
Ireland’s Department of Finance reported increased income tax, VAT and corporation tax receipts from 2024; in other news, it’s understood that HSBC has agreed to pay the French treasury to settle a tax investigation
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two