The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court (SCA) rendered a landmark decision on March 4 2013, explains Kennet Pettersson of Ernst & Young. The main dispute concerned location savings and whether such benefits could be allocated to a foreign low cost subsidiary. Though the SCA’s decision rejected the locations savings which were sought to be applied in the case at hand, the decision clearly recognises location savings and the allocation of these benefits to a low cost subsidiary provided similar functions were conducted in Finland before the reorganisation and benefits availed can be clearly crystallised.
Unlock this content.
The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.
A landmark ruling on LLP taxation has clarified who truly holds ‘significant influence’ and which partnership structures are most likely to withstand HMRC scrutiny
Fresh from the UN negotiations in New York, Alex Cobham offers ITR readers a rare first-hand perspective on the future of international tax cooperation
Despite initial hopes that the reporting obligation had been suspended, compliance challenges brought by Brazil’s indirect tax reform are very much a reality