All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Update on new UK CFC rules

The new UK controlled foreign company (CFC) rules are due to come into effect for accounting periods starting on or after January 1 2013. Lorna Smith and Liz Hughes of Grant Thornton UK emphasise the importance of assessing significant people functions (SPF).

The new rules were originally published in December 2011 however there has recently been additional guidance issued by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC). As the new rules represent a significant change in approach, HMRC is holding a series of road shows during the autumn on the new CFC regime and the patent box. The road shows will be attended by HMRC's customer relationship managers and tax specialists.

In our earlier article, we introduced some important concepts that will be familiar to transfer pricing practitioners.

For example, some taxpayers may be required to identify whether there are any SPFs carried out in the UK in relation to the business of the CFC. This concept was first introduced in the OECD 2010 Report on the Attribution of Profits to Permanent Establishments.

SPFs are not defined further within the CFC legislation and so reliance will be placed on the definitions in the 2010 report.

Broadly, under the new rules, any non-UK resident company that is controlled by a UK company will be a CFC. Although there are a number of exemptions that may apply, if there are any SPFs that are carried out in the UK, which relate to the business carried out by the CFC, it may be necessary to treat the SPF of the CFC as if it is a UK branch of the CFC and attribute profits of the CFC to the branch.

Hence, the importance of the OECD report: firstly in determining what is an SPF and then how to attribute profits to the hypothesised branch. However, where the activities in the UK are already remunerated on an arm's-length basis, it is possible that no additional charge will arise.

SPFs are people who carry out fundamental business functions that lead to the assumption of risk, the ownership of assets or the on-going management of those assets and risks.

The first step in this process is to determine what are the key functions and risks in the business. What constitutes a key function or risk may be different depending on the business involved. For example, for companies in the pharmaceutical industry, research and development (R&D) may be important, whilst for fast moving consumables, marketing and brand development may be vital.

Once the key assets and risks have been identified, work needs to be performed to identify who performs those key functions, undertakes activities that lead to the assumption of risk, or manages those assets and risks.

Those people may not be the most senior or well paid in the organisation. They should, however, be the people that make active decisions regarding those assets and risks.

For example, in the pharmaceutical company it may be the person who decides whether to abort a project or to extend further funding to it, or interprets the results of the research.

This may not be the same person who is responsible for R&D at board level, nor the person who works in the laboratory performing the R&D.

To identify SPFs, and in particular if there is a UK-based SPF, a functional and factual analysis of the UK company and the CFC should be carried out.

In considering the application of the new CFC rules in a group, an important information source will be the group's transfer pricing documentation, which should already include such functional analysis, although it may require supplementing to analyse the issue in the particular circumstances of the CFC.

Grant Thornton UK held a client webinar on 18 September 2012 at which Liz Hughes, a Director in the Transfer Pricing team, outlined the SPF concept as it applies to CFCs.

More from across our site

Japan reports a windfall from all types of taxes after the government revised its stimulus package. This could lead to greater corporate tax incentives for businesses.
Sources at Netflix, the European Commission and elsewhere consider the impact of incoming legislation to regulate tax advice in the EU – if it ever comes to pass.
This week European Commission officials consider legal loopholes to secure minimum corporate taxation, while Cisco and Microsoft shareholders call for tax transparency.
The fast-food company’s tax settlement with French authorities strengthens the need for businesses to review their TP arrangements and documentation.
The full ALP model will be adopted through a new TP regime, which is set to boost the country’s investments and tax certainty.
Tax professionals have called on the UK government to reconsider its online sales tax as it would affect the economy at the worst time.
Tax professionals have called on companies to act urgently to meet e-invoicing compliance targets as the EU plans to ramp up digitisation.
In the wake of India’s ambitious 25-year plan for economic growth, ITR has partnered with leading tax commentators to discuss what the future will look like for India and for the rest of the world.
But experts cast doubt on HMRC's data and believe COVID-19 would have increased the revenue shortfall.
EY’s plan to separate its auditing and consulting businesses might lessen scrutiny from global regulators, but the brand identity could suffer, say sources.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree