India rules on profits attributed to permanent establishments
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India rules on profits attributed to permanent establishments

A tribunal in India has ruled that payment of the arm’s length price to a dependent agent does not remove the tax liability of a foreign entities’ permanent establishment in India.

The Delhi Bench of the Income-tax Appellate made this decision following a case against Rolls Royce.

The case dates back to 2007 when the tribunal ruled that Rolls Royce had a business connection and permanent establishment in India and that 35% of the global profits from sales made in India were attributable to Rolls Royce in India.

Rolls Royce contested this decision on the grounds that payment of the arm’s-length price to the dependent agent in India would eliminate the company's tax liability having a foreign entity in India. It also challenged the fact that the Revenue had attributed profit to the permanent establishment and taxed the profits.

The company also contended that the Delhi Tribunal had ignored Madras High Court’s ruling in the case of Annamalais Timber Trust & Co which stated that 10% of profits are to be considered as profits to be attributed to India.

After considering Rolls Royce's arguments, the tribunal held that the tax liability of the non-resident in India could be eliminated only where the profits attributable to the permanent establishment equal the payments to the agent in India.

It was also decided that Rolls Royce’s transfer pricing analysis did not adequately reflect the functions performed and risks assumed by the agent and they would need to attribute profits to the permanent establishment for the risks and functions that were not considered in the analysis for determining the arm’s-length price.

A press release by KPMG's tax group in India said: “This decision has reiterated that income attribution for PE in India would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case.”

It was decided that if some activities are carried out outside India for which no profit could be attributable to the activities in India, then such profit could not be taxed there.

Similarly, losses arising from activities carried out outside India should not be considered while computing the profit. Since the activities of Rolls Royce in India consist of marketing and sales, expenses should be reduced while R&D activities which result in losses to the appellant (which are not carried out in India) should be ignored while computing global profits to be attributed to the Indian operations.

Rolls Royce was unavailable for comment at the time of press.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Proposals by HM Revenue and Customs to raise standards in the advisory market are ‘well overdue’, one partner declared
An intimate understanding of a client’s sector is essential to winning new business, a survey of over 28,000 corporate counsel reveals
‘Auditors are failing to perform their core function’ according to a think tank; in other news, White & Case adds a tax partner in Luxembourg
An overhaul of EU import taxes could spell the end of an exemption for cheap parcels
Sharma, managing director for A&M in the United Arab Emirates, tells ITR about intense time pressures, mimicking Jurgen Klopp and what makes tax cool
AI will speed up some of the most laborious TP processes without making human input redundant, argues Hank Moonen, CEO of TaxModel
Firms with a broad geographic reach are more likely to win work, especially from global companies with high turnovers, according to survey data of nearly 29,000 corporate counsel
Australian businessman Gordon Merchant used EY’s advice to offset an A$85 million capital gain, according to the Federal Court
Griggs has been drafted in ahead of schedule as the incumbent Tim Ryan departs for Citigroup; while the Netherlands plans to scrap a 15% share buyback tax
Authorities must ensure that Russian firms do not use transfer pricing schemes to increase profits made from oil sold in different markets, advocacy organisations have argued
Gift this article