Lack of cost sharing rules causes problems for taxpayers in Taiwan
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Lack of cost sharing rules causes problems for taxpayers in Taiwan

thai-log-tiny.jpg

The Taiwan Ministry of Finance recently introduced guidelines for the determination of Taiwan source income.

The release seeks to clarify the position for taxpayers and tax authorities on whether service remuneration received in connection with services rendered outside of Taiwan, but utilised by a Taiwan entity, is Taiwan source income.

There is no cost sharing in Taiwan, which results in a payment of 20% withholding tax for taxpayers. For instance, if a payment is paid by a Taiwan entity to a foreign entity there is a 20% withholding tax.

“The rules have been changed so that if there is evidence that the service is performed outside of Taiwan and the Taiwanese entity has no involvement there is no withholding tax,” said Wendy Chiu, transfer pricing partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers in Taiwan.

“The taxpayer will need to prepare evidence that the service is performed outside Taiwan,” she added.

The guidance clarifies which services will constitute Taiwan source income and allow the deduction of related costs and expenses. This could reduce the tax burden on some intercompany transactions.

“If a license is granted to a Taiwan entity, local regulations under article 4 of the Income Tax law states that this is free from withholding tax depending on the type of license. Taiwan likes to encourage high tech investment so this type of investment is free from withholding tax,” said George Chou, transfer pricing partner at Ernst & Young in Taiwan.

However, withholding tax is due for other types of licenses. “If a Taiwan entity gets a license from a third party, the entity has to pay for intangibles even if the Taiwan entity doesn’t use them but the branch does,” said Chiu.

“The tax authorities have said that no matter who benefits there is a 20% withholding tax due which includes related party transactions,” she added.

However, if a foreign entity engages a Taiwan entity for performance of services such as manufacturing, the Taiwan entity does not have to pay withholding tax.

Manager’s fees from headquarters to branches are only tax free if paid to a Taiwan entity. There is a 20% withholding tax if the fee is paid to a non-Taiwan entity.

The OECD guidelines state that payment is due where services are provided however in Taiwan the rule had been that payment is due where the services are received.

“The tax authority’s position has changed due to pressure from the taxpayer and now the rules follow the OECD guidelines so that payment is due where the services are provided,” said Chou.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The reported warning follows EY accumulating extra debt to deal with the costs of its failed Project Everest
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Paul Griggs, the firm’s inbound US senior partner, will reverse a move by the incumbent leader; in other news, RSM has announced its new CEO
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Luis Coronado suggests companies should embrace technology to assist with TP data reporting, as the ‘big four’ firm unveils a TP survey of over 1,000 professionals
The proposed matrix will help revenue officers track intra-company transactions from multinationals
The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
The ‘big four’ firm has threatened to legally pursue those behind the letter, which has been circulating on social media
The guidelines have been established in the wake of multiple tax scandals and controversies that have rocked the accounting profession
KPMG Netherlands’ former head of assurance also received a permanent bar and $150,000 fine; in other news, asset management firm BlackRock lost a $13.5bn UK tax appeal
Gift this article