Italy clarifies key transfer pricing tenants
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy clarifies key transfer pricing tenants

italy-flag.jpg

Italy’s tax authority clarified a number of transfer pricing regulations at the nation’s annual tax conference, Telefisco. Salvatore Mattia and Federico Vincenti from Crowe Valente explore the key changes surrounding penalty protections and discrepancies in tax filings.

During Telefisco 2019, Italy’s annual tax conference, Italy’s tax authority clarified several transfer pricing (TP) tenants. Notably, the most important include:

a) Clarification regarding when penalty protection may be applied to TP documentation; and

b) The inapplicability of penalties for filing discrepant tax returns in the TP area.

Penalty protection

In accordance with Article 1, Paragraph 6, and Article 2, Paragraph 4 of Legislative Decree No. 471/1997, if a taxpayer provides the authorities with adequate documentation that shows TP policy was applied appropriately within intercompany transactions, penalties for administrative violations related to tax return discrepancies may not apply (i.e. “penalty protection”).

However, taxpayers who benefit from this exemption are required to provide all the necessary documentation to allow the tax authority to carry out a complete analysis on the TP policy applied on the intercompany transactions (“suitability” of TP documentation).

Any difference between the TP methods and the selection of comparable transactions/companies which have been chosen by the taxpayer within the TP documentation during the tax audit is not considered relevant in assessing the suitability of TP documentation.

Furthermore, compliance with the applicable regulation does not imply the suitability of such documentation.

Therefore, it is important that the documents provided by the taxpayer to the tax auditors facilitate in understanding the TP policy applied and its compliance with the arm’s-length principle.

Discrepancies in tax returns

Italian tax authorities have further clarified that tax returns filed with discrepancies in the TP area are not liable for penalty. However, in the case of TP adjustments, fraudulent declarations may be applied as a penalty instead.

In accordance with Article 4 of Legislative Decree No. 74/2000, which was amended by Legislative Decree No. 158/2015, a tax return discrepancy offence occurs when a taxpayer discloses an income that is smaller than the actual amount, or non-existent liabilities under the following joint circumstances:

  • The total evaded tax is higher than EUR 150,000 ($170,000); and

  • The total amount of non-disclosed income/profit, also through non-existent loss elements, is higher than 10% of the total amount filed in the tax return, or higher than EUR 3 million.

The novelty relies on the fact that the new provision replaces the expression “fictitious loss elements” with “non-existent loss elements”.

Consequently, as confirmed by Italy’s tax authority, TP adjustments may not be considered a tax offence in light of their estimated values.

Salvatore Mattia

Salvatore Mattia

 

Federico Vincenti

Federico Vincenti

This article was written by Salvatore Mattia and Federico Vincenti of Valente Associati GEB Partners/ Crowe Valente.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Burrowes had initially been parachuted into the role last summer to navigate the fallout from the firm’s tax leaks scandal
Barbara Voskamp is bullish on hiring local talent to boost DLA Piper’s Singapore practice, and argues that ‘big four’ accountants suffer from a stifled creativity
Chris Jordan also said that nations have a duty to scrutinise the partnership structures of major firms, while, in other news, a number of tax teams expanded their benches
KPMG has exclusive access to the tool for three years in the UK, giving it an edge over ‘big four’ rivals
But the US tax agency’s advice is consistent with OECD guidance and shouldn’t surprise anyone, other experts tell ITR
A survey of more than 25,000 in-house counsel reveals that diversity initiatives are a high priority when choosing external counsel
The report is aimed at helping 'low-capacity countries', the OECD has claimed
The UK tax agency appears to be going after easier, lower value targets, one lawyer has claimed
Criminal experts have told ITR that the case of Ulf Johannemann emphasises the fine line between tax avoidance and tax evasion
The ATO workers were among nearly 57,000 people who were duped into claiming fake GST refunds, while Kuwait signed a double taxation treaty with the UAE
Gift this article