EU changes VAT liability for transactions facilitated by digital platforms
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU changes VAT liability for transactions facilitated by digital platforms

Sponsored by

EU changes VAT liability for transactions facilitated by digital platforms

Digital platforms have until December 2020 to prepare for changes introduced by the EU, which will require digital platforms to pay VAT on behalf of their non-EU sellers and on import of goods into the EU.

On March 20-22 2019, the OECD Global VAT Forum endorsed measures proposed in its report, entitled ‘The Role of Digital Platforms in the Collection of VAT/GST on Online Sales’, that address the VAT/GST treatment of digital platforms that facilitate online transactions between two or more persons (typically buyers and sellers).

The 87-page report included measures that would make e-commerce marketplaces liable for VAT/GST on sales made by online traders through their platforms. Therefore, this would make it easier for tax authorities to ensure that tax is collected on such transactions, i.e. monitoring a limited number of platforms is easier than monitoring a multitude of smaller businesses doing business through such platforms.

The report examined two possible models to ensure the collection of VAT/GST in a world where online sales are booming:

  • The first model would make the platform fully liable for the payment and remittance of VAT/GST on the online sales they facilitate; and

  • The second is a ‘softer’ model, limiting the responsibility of the platforms to assisting the VAT authorities in the collection of VAT/GST.

The report also described possible ways in which this assistance may work in practice.

It should be noted that OECD reports are not binding on member states, but instead they aim to influence countries’ tax policies by functioning as a reference point and encouraging consistent approaches.

EU gets impatient

The EU did not await the approval of the OECD report and instead issued a directive approved by the Economic and Financial Affairs Council (ECOFIN) on December 7 2017, as well as a proposal for an implementing regulation on December 11 2018, yet to be approved by the ECOFIN. The new rules form part of the European Commission’s 2016 e-commerce VAT package that becomes effective from January 1 2021.

Under the EU directive, platforms would be treated as the seller of goods when they facilitate sales by non-EU sellers to EU non-taxable persons (such as private customers); thus, they would be responsible for paying the VAT due on the sales. Platforms also would be responsible for the payment of VAT when they facilitate imports within the EU of goods that have a value up to €150 ($168), with the exception of alcohol and tobacco products. The directive would abolish the VAT exemption on low value imports with a value of €22 or less. The platform would have to pay the VAT due in each EU member state in which the customers or importers reside, using the “one-stop-shop” scheme of their own member state. As a result, the platforms would not have to VAT register in the member state of the customers or importers but they would be required to maintain certain records.

The EU thus opted for the full liability model because it considers the lighter model to be inefficient (where platforms assist tax authorities in the collection of the tax). The underlying idea in the EU rules is to introduce a system which ensures that non-EU sellers (and EU non-taxable persons importing goods) fulfil their VAT obligations.

Digital platforms have until December 31 2020 to adapt to these changes imposed by the EU rules.

This article was written by Christian Deglas, partner, Michel Lambion, managing director and Eric Réolon, director, at Deloitte Tax & Consulting Luxembourg.






Christian Deglas ( and Michel Lambion (

Deloitte Tax & Consulting Luxembourg


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

However, making APAs harder to reach could ‘pose problems’ for UK businesses
Microsoft's director of benefits taxation tells ITR about having no normal days, family inspiration and what makes tax cool
The 61-year-old has run the firm’s UK business since 2020
The report, which again demanded PwC release more information related to the scandal, 'did not go far enough', Australian Greens Senator Barbara Pocock told ITR
Resources needed to manage new compliance and financial reporting requirements will be significant, BDO also said
Interested parties may submit their comments on proposed bills and the subsidiary legislation by July 5
The Australian government has run roughshod over professional tax bodies with untested reporting obligations to please a mob baying for PwC’s blood, writes Tom Ravlic
Technical excellence is paramount for clients looking to hire new advisers, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 corporate counsel
The EU nation currently has a headline rate of 25%; in other news, DLA Piper and RSM UK have strengthened their tax teams
Labour's plans for closing the tax gap suggest that taxpayers may face an increasingly aggressive HMRC
Gift this article