International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

SEC lightens the load on big five

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is to adopt milder than expected rule amendments regarding auditor independence. The announcement follows months of debate between the organization and the big five accounting firms.

Accounting firms felt threatened by the SEC's summer proposals that regarded any services other than audit services provided to audit clients to breach auditor independence. Many firms had been working on the one-stop-shop principle providing both audit and advisory services to clients. The SEC felt that this could jeopardize the independence of audits and lead to biased investment. PricewaterhouseCoopers has been especially criticized, with around 8000 allegations of rule violations in 2000 alone.

The new guidelines will become effective in February 2001. Although the firms have had insufficient time to study the legislation in detail, on the surface the amendments appear to help them. Ernst & Young, Deloitte & Touche and Arthur Andersen all confirm that they are very pleased with the new ruling.

The amendments reduce the number of audit firm employees whose investments in audit clients are attributed to the auditor, and allow firms to provide certain non-audit services, including IT consultancy, to audit clients. Certain conditions related to quality must be satisfied.

While the firms have expressed their satisfaction with the ruling, there is some risk that the details of the legislation could restrict services. However, Deloitte & Touche, who disagreed strongly with the original ruling states that the rules will have no significant impact on the business, as it can now continue to stay together as a multidisciplinary firm.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Premier League football clubs are accused of avoiding paying up to £470 million in UK tax, while Malta is poised to overhaul its unique corporate tax system.
Bartosz Doroszuk of MDDP offers insights on Poland’s new tax legislation on shifted profits, as the implementation deadline looms nearer.
Four tax specialists preview the UK’s transfer pricing requirements, which come into effect on April 1.
The rise of the QDMTT will likely change how countries compete on tax and transfer pricing policy, but it may not reverse decades of falling corporate tax rates.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.