Vietnam: Republic of San Marino signs tax treaty with Vietnam

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Vietnam: Republic of San Marino signs tax treaty with Vietnam

pham.jpg

Thuan Pham

In an effort to avoid the double taxation of international income and thus promote foreign direct investment, Vietnam has concluded double taxation agreements (DTAs) with more than 60 countries to date – the most recent of which was with the Republic of San Marino on February 19 2013, the first of the five smallest jurisdictions in the world to do so. The Vietnam–San Marino DTA is pending ratification, but it is understood that there will not be much benefit for taxpayers, since most of the tax rates under the DTA are equal to or higher than those under Vietnam's domestic regulations.

Table 1 summarises some notable points and the tax effect under the DTA versus under domestic tax regulations for various income sources from Vietnam:

We note that with the way the taxing rights are allocated under the capital gains clause, capital gains at the holding level can be taxed in Vietnam if more than 30% (in value) of the property owned by the holding (directly or indirectly) consists of immovable property located in Vietnam.

In other words, for example, Company A is a resident of San Marino, and owns 100% of the capital of its subsidiary B in Vietnam. B owns and operates a resort and villas in Vietnam. The value of the villas/resort exceeds 30% of the aggregate value of all assets owned by Company A. When the shareholders of Company A transfer shares in Company A to another buyer offshore, Vietnam can tax this gain subject to its domestic regulations. However, Vietnamese law does not provide a clear mechanism for collecting this tax, even though certain official rulings have confirmed the subject-to-tax position of those offshore sales in Vietnam.

This rule does not exist in earlier DTAs signed with other jurisdictions; this could be an indication that Vietnam plans to officially impose capital gains taxation at the offshore holding level soon.

Table 1

Types of income

DTA between Vietnam and San Marino

Vietnam regulations

Permanent establishment (PE) definition

One situation where a PE is constituted is when a person conducts activities in Vietnam (including offshore activities) that relate to the exploration for and exploitation of natural resources located in Vietnam.

N/A

Dividends

Vietnam can tax, but the rate will not exceed:

(a) 10% of the gross amount of the dividends if the beneficial owner is a company that has directly held at least 10% of the capital of the company paying the dividends for an uninterrupted period of at least 12 months before the decision to distribute the dividends.

(b) 15% of the gross amount of the dividends in all other cases.

Beneficiary organisation: N/A

Beneficiary individual: 5%

Interest

Vietnam can tax, but the rate will not exceed:

(a) 10% if the beneficial owner is a company that has directly held at least 10% of the capital of the company paying the interest for an uninterrupted period of at least 12 months before the decision to pay the interest.

(b) 15% in all other cases.

5%

Royalties

Vietnam can tax, but the rate will not exceed:

(a) 10% of the gross amount of the royalties if the beneficial owner is a company that has directly held at least 10% of the capital of the company paying the royalties for an uninterrupted period of at least 12 months before the payment of the royalties.

(b) 15% of the gross amount of the royalties in all other cases.

10%

Technical fees

Vietnam can tax, but the rate will not exceed 10% of the gross amount of the technical fees.

5%

Capital gains

Vietnam can tax:

(a) Gains from the alienation of shares of the capital stock of a company, or of an interest in a partnership, trust or estate, which owns property (directly or indirectly) that consists principally of immovable property situated in Vietnam. The concept “principally” in relation to the ownership of immovable property means the value of such immovable property exceeding 30% of the aggregate value of all assets owned by the company, partnership, trust or estate.

(b) Gains from the alienation of shares other than those mentioned in (a) above in a company which is a resident of Vietnam.

Taxed on a net gain basis at the normal rate of 25%

Thuan Pham (thuan.pham@vdb-loi.com)

VDB Loi

Tel: +84 8 3914 7272

Fax: +84 8 3915 4248

Website: www.vdb-loi.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Taxpayers should support the MAP process by sharing accurate information early on and maintaining open communication with the competent authorities, the OECD also said
The Fortune 150 energy multinational is among more than 12 companies participating in the initiative, which ‘helps tax teams put generative AI to work’
The ruling excludes vacation and business development days from service PE calculations and confirms virtual services from abroad don’t count, potentially reshaping compliance for multinationals
User-friendly digital tax filing systems, transformative AI deployment, and the continued proliferation of DSTs will define 2026, writes Ascoria’s Neil Kelley
Case workers are ‘still not great’ but are making fewer enquiries, making the right decision more often and are more open to calls, ITR has heard
There is a shocking discrepancy between professional services firms’ parental leave packages. Those that fail to get with the times risk losing out in the war for talent
Winston Taylor is expected to launch in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers across the US, UK, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East
They are alleging that leaked tax information ‘unfairly tarnished’ their business operations; in other news, Davis Polk and Eversheds Sutherland made key tax hires
Overall revenues for the combined UK and Swiss firm inched up 2% to £3.6 billion despite a ‘challenging market’
In the first of a two-part series, experts from Khaitan & Co dissect a highly anticipated Indian Supreme Court ruling that marks a decisive shift in India’s international tax jurisprudence
Gift this article