All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

India: India specifies Cyprus as a notified jurisdictional area



Rajendra Nayak

Aastha Jain

The Indian Tax Law (ITL) provides a toolbox of measures to discourage transactions with entities in non-cooperative tax jurisdictions which do not exchange information with India. It empowers the government of India (GoI) to specify any country or territory outside India as a notified jurisdictional area (NJA) having regard to lack of effective exchange of information. Any transactions entered into by taxpayers in India with a person located in an NJA would attract adverse consequences under the ITL. India entered into a tax treaty with Cyprus in 1994 pursuant to which both the countries are under an obligation to exchange information necessary to prevent fraud or evasion of taxes. As per the GoI, since Cyprus has not been providing information required by the Indian Tax Authorities, it is notified as an NJA with effect from November 1 2013.

As a consequence, any transaction between a taxpayer and a person located in Cyprus will be deemed to be an international transaction subject to transfer pricing provisions of the ITL and all parties to such transaction would be deemed to be associated enterprises. This entails maintenance of documentation and reporting as prescribed under the ITL. All payments made to a person in Cyprus, which are chargeable to tax in India, would attract a higher withholding tax at 30% rate. Further, to claim deduction of any payments made to person located in Cyprus, the taxpayer would need to maintain documents and furnish prescribed information to Indian tax authorities. Where any payments are made to a financial institution in Cyprus, the taxpayer is required to furnish an authorisation to Indian tax authorities to collect any requisite information from such financial institution. Any sum received or credited from a person located in Cyprus shall be deemed to be income of the taxpayer unless it satisfactorily explains the source of such funds in the hands of the payer in Cyprus or beneficial owner such funds (if it is not the payer). Further, a person located in NJA (Cyprus) is defined to include (a) a resident of NJA or (b) an entity established in NJA or (c) a permanent establishment in NJA of any person.

The notification of NJA is consistent with the global trend of introducing counter measures to deal with "non-cooperative tax jurisdictions" and strengthen tax enforcement. Cyprus is the first jurisdiction to be notified as an NJA in India. Pursuant to this, the Cyprus government has issued a press release declaring its intention to resolve the situation with the GoI and clarifying that this development does not impact the operation of the India-Cyprus tax treaty. Taxpayers having business arrangements involving Cyprus will need to review the impact of this notification on their transactions/business structures and follow the developments between the two governments on this front.

Rajendra Nayak ( and Aastha Jain (

Ernst & Young

Tel: +91 80 4027 5275


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Multinational companies fear the scrutiny of aggressive tax audits may be overstepping the mark on transfer pricing methodology.
Standardisation and outsourcing are two possible solutions amid increasing regulations and scrutiny on transfer pricing, say sources.
Inaugural awards announces winners
The UN’s decision to seek a leadership role in global tax policy could be a crucial turning point but won’t be the end of the OECD, say tax experts.
The UN may be set to assume a global role in tax policy that would rival the OECD, while automakers lobby the US to change its tax rules on Chinese materials.
Companies including Valentino and EveryMatrix say the early adoption of EU public CbCR rules could boost transparency of local and foreign MNEs, despite the short notice.
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2023 ITR Tax Awards in Asia-Pacific, Europe Middle East & Africa, and the Americas.
Tax authorities and customs are failing multinationals by creating uncertainty with contradictory assessment and guidance, say in-house tax directors.
The CJEU said the General Court erred in law when it ruled that both companies benefitted from Italian state aid.
An OECD report reveals multinationals have continued to shift profits to low-tax jurisdictions, reinforcing the case for strong multilateral action in response.