Germany: Tax risks for management

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Tax risks for management

rossel.jpg

Carsten Rössel

As in other countries, company directors are under duties of due care, both towards the tax authorities for ensuring that tax liability is correctly declared and towards the shareholders for ensuring that taxes are not overpaid. This latter includes penalties for under or late reporting, so that, at this level, the two duties are not in conflict. However, the current discussion on aggressive tax planning along with the recent tightening of the provisions governing exemption from criminal penalties for tax wrong-doers coming forward of their own volition has encouraged tax auditors to see tax avoidance attempts in estimates or assumptions which they consider to be unfounded. The high cost of refuting such accusations can appear to shareholders as an avoidable expense. The answer is for the directors to protect themselves and their company with an appropriate tax risk management system. This encompasses a complete schedule of all tax filing and payment deadlines together with appropriate backups to ensure compliance in the event of unexpected absence of the individuals responsible. It also includes a complete register of all known tax risks, the measures taken to identify and contain them and full documentation of the position to be taken in the company's defence. This documentation should explain in full the reasons for the position taken. In many ways it is similar to that required under the transfer pricing rules, although it does not demand the same degree of formality. Of particular importance is the establishment of a clear division of duties within top management. Naturally, the system must be monitored.

It should also be realised that outsourcing functions does not absolve management of its compliance duties. This particularly applies to accounting (in agreement with the tax office) and other functions assumed by group shared service centres as these are almost invariably not covered by any form of professional liability insurance.

Carsten Rössel (carsten.roessel@de.pwc.com)
PwC

Tel: +49 211 981-7141

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

There is a shocking discrepancy between professional services firms’ parental leave packages. Those that fail to get with the times risk losing out in the war for talent
Winston Taylor is expected to launch in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers across the US, UK, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East
They are alleging that leaked tax information ‘unfairly tarnished’ their business operations; in other news, Davis Polk and Eversheds Sutherland made key tax hires
Overall revenues for the combined UK and Swiss firm inched up 2% to £3.6 billion despite a ‘challenging market’
In the first of a two-part series, experts from Khaitan & Co dissect a highly anticipated Indian Supreme Court ruling that marks a decisive shift in India’s international tax jurisprudence
The OECD profile signals Brazil is no longer a jurisdiction where TP can be treated as a mechanical compliance exercise, one expert suggests, though another highlights 'significant concerns'
Libya’s often-overlooked stamp duty can halt payments and freeze contracts, making this quiet tax a decisive hurdle for foreign investors to clear, writes Salaheddin El Busefi
Eugena Cerny shares hard-earned lessons from tax automation projects and explains how to navigate internal roadblocks and miscommunications
The Clifford Chance and Hyatt cases collectively confirm a fundamental principle of international tax law: permanent establishment is a concept based on physical and territorial presence
Australian government minister Andrew Leigh reflects on the fallout of the scandal three years on and looks ahead to regulatory changes
Gift this article