International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Tax risks for management

rossel.jpg

Carsten Rössel

As in other countries, company directors are under duties of due care, both towards the tax authorities for ensuring that tax liability is correctly declared and towards the shareholders for ensuring that taxes are not overpaid. This latter includes penalties for under or late reporting, so that, at this level, the two duties are not in conflict. However, the current discussion on aggressive tax planning along with the recent tightening of the provisions governing exemption from criminal penalties for tax wrong-doers coming forward of their own volition has encouraged tax auditors to see tax avoidance attempts in estimates or assumptions which they consider to be unfounded. The high cost of refuting such accusations can appear to shareholders as an avoidable expense. The answer is for the directors to protect themselves and their company with an appropriate tax risk management system. This encompasses a complete schedule of all tax filing and payment deadlines together with appropriate backups to ensure compliance in the event of unexpected absence of the individuals responsible. It also includes a complete register of all known tax risks, the measures taken to identify and contain them and full documentation of the position to be taken in the company's defence. This documentation should explain in full the reasons for the position taken. In many ways it is similar to that required under the transfer pricing rules, although it does not demand the same degree of formality. Of particular importance is the establishment of a clear division of duties within top management. Naturally, the system must be monitored.

It should also be realised that outsourcing functions does not absolve management of its compliance duties. This particularly applies to accounting (in agreement with the tax office) and other functions assumed by group shared service centres as these are almost invariably not covered by any form of professional liability insurance.

Carsten Rössel (carsten.roessel@de.pwc.com)
PwC

Tel: +49 211 981-7141

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF has warned Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.
Industry groups are concerned about the shift away from the ALP towards formulary apportionment as part of a common consolidated corporate tax base across the EU.
The former tax official in Italy will take up her post in April.