Albania: Changes in the tax deductibility of cross-border management and consulting fees

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Albania: Changes in the tax deductibility of cross-border management and consulting fees

albania-flag.jpg

A new law, which becomes effective April 30 2013, has made stricter the requirements for the tax deductibility of consulting, technical service and management fees invoiced from abroad.

Pursuant to the income tax law provision amendment, consulting, technical and management fees invoiced from abroad had been tax deductible to the extent the amount invoiced was paid during the fiscal year which the service referred to. Moreover, according to the Minister of Finance’s instructions, the amounts have also been tax deductible when the corresponding 10% withholding tax was paid to the tax authorities within the fiscal year of the service supply.

Pursuant to the new law, the tax deductibility of the relevant expense for technical and consultancy services and management fees becomes dependent not on the payment of the invoice, but on the payment of the withholding tax to the tax authorities which will have to take place before December 31 of the year in which the service was provided. Therefore, local entities will need to communicate with their foreign service providers, whether affiliates or third parties, requesting to receive invoices or at least pro-forma invoices well in advance of December 31 of the year the service was rendered and plan to effect the corresponding withholding tax payment before year-end.

In case of an applicable tax treaty protecting the relevant income from being subject to Albanian withholding tax at the standard 10% rate, the local entity will have to communicate with the foreign service provider to receive the complete file of supporting documents for filing the tax treaty relief claim with the Albanian Tax Authorities several months before the calendar year-end, which the service refers to. Otherwise, it may risk not obtaining the tax treaty relief clearance on time and thus to have to withhold and pay tax at 10% on the invoiced amount to ensure the tax deductibility of the expense. Under the old provisions, settlement of the invoice was sufficient, which could be followed by initiating the tax treaty relief procedure in a subsequent year. Pursuant to the new rule, unless tax treaty relief has been previously applied for and obtained, the failure to withhold the 10% tax on the relevant cross-border consulting, technical service and management fees before the year-end causes the relevant expense not to be tax deductible.

Jona Bica (Jona.Bica@al.ey.com) is a tax senior at Ernst & Young, principal Corporate Tax correspondent for Albania.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

HMRC expects advisers to meet ever-higher compliance criteria. After 24 consecutive qualified audit opinions, many will ask whether HMRC should hold itself to the same standards
The purchase of Marosa represents the second major tax tech consolidation this week, raising questions of a broader industry trend
Peru’s approach to TP is increasingly at odds with OECD-style profitability policies, exposing multinational groups to asymmetric tax adjustments
Hany Elnaggar examines how the region's legacy economic substance regimes and the OECD's pillar two framework are converging on the same underlying test
The deals for TP Accurate and Intra Pricing Solutions will enhance Alphatax’s ability to support clients with the full TP lifecycle, the tax tech provider claimed
The DS Advocates partner discusses career reinvention, tax disputes and why advisory and litigation experience should complement one another
Lindsay Clayton’s arrival at Baker McKenzie continues the firm’s storied pursuit of ex-US government lawyers, a strategy reinforced by robust World Tax rankings
Shared transaction semantics, governed data and reusable ERP design may prove the most significant benefits of the UK's move to Peppol
As pillar two reshapes global tax competition, the UK faces a crucial challenge: how to remain attractive to multinationals without sacrificing tax revenues
Pillar two may be raising less than expected, but professor René Matteotti says the regime is still changing multinational tax behaviour
Gift this article