Australia: New government’s tax agenda

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: New government’s tax agenda

seymour.jpg

Tom Seymour

The recently elected Australian government has made the first move towards repealing the Minerals Resource Rent Tax (MRRT) and the carbon pricing mechanism, with effect from July 1 2014, with the release of legislation to give effect to the repeal. As the introduction of the MRRT, which applies to Australian iron ore and coal miners, was linked to a number of tax concessions, the government's position is that some, but not all, of these tax concessions are to also now be repealed or amended. These include:

  • The company loss carry-back rules – to be repealed with effect from the start of the 2013-14 income year;

  • The increase to the compulsory superannuation guarantee (SG) charge to 12% – to be adjusted so that the 12% rate will not apply until July 1 2021 instead of July 1 2019;

  • A number of capital allowance concessions for eligible small business entities – to be repealed broadly from January 1 2014; and

  • Immediate deductions for geothermal energy exploration and prospecting expenditure – to be repealed with effect for expenditure incurred after June 30 2014.

The government has also made inroads into clearing the backlog of announced but not enacted tax measures from previous governments indicating that some measures will be abandoned and some will be subject to further consultation.

Of particular interest to large businesses with international operations was the fate of the package of measures announced by the previous government in the Federal Budget in May 2013, which were designed to tackle profit shifting through artificial loading of debt in Australia.

In a pleasing move, the new government announced that it will not proceed with the measure to deny interest deductions for debt funding costs associated with investments in foreign companies that generate exempt dividends, and will instead introduce a targeted anti-avoidance rule after consultation with stakeholders. The other elements of the international reform package, however, will proceed as originally announced. Specifically, the government will continue with the tightening of the thin capitalisation rules by reducing the safe harbour debt limit to 1.5:1 debt-to-equity ratio (reduced from the current 3:1 ratio). Additionally, it will remove the exemption for foreign non-portfolio dividends in respect of shares that are treated as debt interests for Australian tax purposes.

The government also indicated that it will not proceed with several other measures, including amendments to the tax treatment of Offshore Banking Units (to be replaced with a targeted integrity measure).

A number of outstanding tax measures have been given the go ahead, including the removal of the R&D tax incentive for very large businesses, a range of amendments to the tax consolidation provisions announced in this year's Federal Budget, the introduction of a new tax regime for Managed Investment Trusts and the third tranche of the Investment Manager Regime which provides a tax exemption for passive investments of certain foreign widely held funds.

Tom Seymour (tom.seymour@au.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +61 (7) 3257 8623

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

There is a shocking discrepancy between professional services firms’ parental leave packages. Those that fail to get with the times risk losing out in the war for talent
Winston Taylor is expected to launch in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers across the US, UK, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East
They are alleging that leaked tax information ‘unfairly tarnished’ their business operations; in other news, Davis Polk and Eversheds Sutherland made key tax hires
Overall revenues for the combined UK and Swiss firm inched up 2% to £3.6 billion despite a ‘challenging market’
In the first of a two-part series, experts from Khaitan & Co dissect a highly anticipated Indian Supreme Court ruling that marks a decisive shift in India’s international tax jurisprudence
The OECD profile signals Brazil is no longer a jurisdiction where TP can be treated as a mechanical compliance exercise, one expert suggests, though another highlights 'significant concerns'
Libya’s often-overlooked stamp duty can halt payments and freeze contracts, making this quiet tax a decisive hurdle for foreign investors to clear, writes Salaheddin El Busefi
Eugena Cerny shares hard-earned lessons from tax automation projects and explains how to navigate internal roadblocks and miscommunications
The Clifford Chance and Hyatt cases collectively confirm a fundamental principle of international tax law: permanent establishment is a concept based on physical and territorial presence
Australian government minister Andrew Leigh reflects on the fallout of the scandal three years on and looks ahead to regulatory changes
Gift this article