Germany: Real estate transfer tax blocker stopped

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Real estate transfer tax blocker stopped

besch.jpg

lehnen.jpg

Christoph Besch


Alexander Lehnen

Property conveyances are subject to a stamp duty (real estate transfer tax – RETT) of between 3.5% and 5.5% of the consideration. Substitute transactions are also subject to this tax, including share transfers leading to the accumulation of 95% or more of a property owning company's shares in a single hand. A similar rule applies to partnerships, though up to now there was no rule linking the two. This led to an avoidance mechanism, known as the RETT blocker. Provided the acquirer of a company was prepared to accept at least a very minor degree of minority interest in his company, he could purchase 94.9% through a wholly-owned company and the remaining 5.1% through a partnership in which he held a 94.9% interest.

No RETT was due as neither of the 95% thresholds were met. However, his effective ownership in the company owning the property amounted – in this example – to 99.7% (94.9% + 94.9%×5.1%).

On June 7, the Bundesrat put an end to this avoidance scheme with a provision in an omnibus tax amendment act combining the two thresholds into one overall effective ownership level. An effective transfer of 99.7% of the shares will thus trigger RETT no matter how it is split between vehicles. However, possibilities for relieving the RETT burden still exist, so intending investors still need to carefully consider alternative structures.

On the other hand, though, there is a compensation for those seeking to reorganise a group structure. The existing – though limited – exemption for transfers of shares within a group with no change in ultimate ownership has been extended to transfers of the property itself, provided there is no consideration other than shareholder's rights. There is now one less barrier to corporate reorganisations within Germany.

Christoph Besch (christoph.besch@de.pwc.com)

Tel: +49 40 6378 1377
Alexander Lehnen (alexander.lehnen@de.pwc.com)

Tel: +49 40 6378 2136

PwC

Website: www.pwc.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Gift this article