Germany: Real estate transfer tax blocker stopped

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Real estate transfer tax blocker stopped

besch.jpg

lehnen.jpg

Christoph Besch


Alexander Lehnen

Property conveyances are subject to a stamp duty (real estate transfer tax – RETT) of between 3.5% and 5.5% of the consideration. Substitute transactions are also subject to this tax, including share transfers leading to the accumulation of 95% or more of a property owning company's shares in a single hand. A similar rule applies to partnerships, though up to now there was no rule linking the two. This led to an avoidance mechanism, known as the RETT blocker. Provided the acquirer of a company was prepared to accept at least a very minor degree of minority interest in his company, he could purchase 94.9% through a wholly-owned company and the remaining 5.1% through a partnership in which he held a 94.9% interest.

No RETT was due as neither of the 95% thresholds were met. However, his effective ownership in the company owning the property amounted – in this example – to 99.7% (94.9% + 94.9%×5.1%).

On June 7, the Bundesrat put an end to this avoidance scheme with a provision in an omnibus tax amendment act combining the two thresholds into one overall effective ownership level. An effective transfer of 99.7% of the shares will thus trigger RETT no matter how it is split between vehicles. However, possibilities for relieving the RETT burden still exist, so intending investors still need to carefully consider alternative structures.

On the other hand, though, there is a compensation for those seeking to reorganise a group structure. The existing – though limited – exemption for transfers of shares within a group with no change in ultimate ownership has been extended to transfers of the property itself, provided there is no consideration other than shareholder's rights. There is now one less barrier to corporate reorganisations within Germany.

Christoph Besch (christoph.besch@de.pwc.com)

Tel: +49 40 6378 1377
Alexander Lehnen (alexander.lehnen@de.pwc.com)

Tel: +49 40 6378 2136

PwC

Website: www.pwc.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
While the manual should be consulted for any questions around MAPs, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also emphasised that the guidance is ‘not a political commitment’
Gift this article