Mexico: New Mexican mining tax
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: New Mexican mining tax

cuellar.jpg

esquivel.jpg

David Cuellar


Salvador Esquivel

Several proposals to implement a new mining royalty have been considered by the Mexican Congress. In December 2012 the three main political parties in Mexico (PRI, PAN and PRD) executed a collaboration agreement called Pact for Mexico which intends to reconcile the proposals of the parties and reach the agreements that the country needs for its development. On March 2013, PRI, the governing party in Mexico, submitted a proposal to the Mexican Congress to introduce a Mexican mining tax. The proposal has been approved by the House of Representatives and has been passed to the Senate for review and approval.

The Senate postponed the approval of this reform until the Second Sessions' Period of September to December 2013, unless there is a call for an Extraordinary Sessions' Period during the summer.

The initiative, as approved by the House of Representatives, aims to establish the payment of a mining tax on exploration and extraction of minerals for the benefit of the states and municipalities where mining takes place.

This new mining tax will likely impact many multinational mining companies with Mexican projects. Below is a summary of the most relevant provisions of the Bill as currently drafted by the House of Representatives.

The tax is determined on an annual basis by applying a 5% rate to the taxable income as determined under Mexican Income Tax Law rules, with certain income – such as interest and taxable annual inflationary adjustment – and deduction – such as interest and depreciation – exceptions.

The tax should be paid by the end of March of the following year. Non-compliance or reporting false information should give rise to cancellation of the concession. No tax loss carry forwards are allowed.

As the tax should be deductible for income tax purposes, the effective tax rate would be 3.6% instead of 5%.

In the case of idle properties, holders of the relevant mining concession will be required to pay an additional 50% of the mining fee they currently pay under the Federal Rights Law for their mining concession, where no exploration or exploitation work is performed on such properties for two consecutive years within the first 11 years following the issuance date of the corresponding concession title.

While for properties where the issuance date of the relevant concession title is 12 years or older, and where no exploration or exploitation work is carried out for two consecutive years, the concession holder would be required to pay an additional 100% of the mining fee they pay under the Federal Rights Law for their mining concession.

Also proposed is the creation of a State Committee for the Regional Development of Mining Areas, comprised by representatives from the federal, state and municipal governments from the relevant communities involved and from the most relevant mining companies operating therein. They will be responsible for managing the funds and shall determine the works for sustainable community development.

David Cuellar (david.cuellar@mx.pwc.com) and Salvador Esquivel (salvador.esquivel@mx.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +52 55 5263 5816

Fax: +52 55 5263 6010

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As German clients attempt to comply with complex cross-border rules, local advisers argue that aggressive tax authorities are making life even harder
Based on surveys covering more than 25,000 in-house lawyers, the series provides insights into what law firms must score highly on when pitching to in-house counsel
The UK tax authority reportedly lost a case due to missing a deadline; in other news, Canada has approved pillar two legislation
There will always be multinationals trying to minimise tax by pushing the boundaries of their cross-border arrangements, Rob Heferen claimed
HMRC’s attempts to crack down on fraudulent tax relief claims are well-meaning, but the agency risks penalising genuinely innovative businesses, writes Katy Long of ForrestBrown
Argentina, Brazil, Mexico and South Africa are among the countries the OECD believes could benefit from the simplified TP rules
It comes despite an offshore enabler penalty existing in the UK throughout the entire period
It is extraordinary that tax advisers in the UK can offer their services without having to join a professional body. This looks like it is coming to an end, Ralph Cunningham writes
Meet the esteemed judges who are assessing the first-ever Social Impact Awards
The ‘big four’ firm has also vowed to spend more on nurturing junior talent; in other news, Blick Rothenberg has hired a pair of tax partners
Gift this article