Editorial

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Editorial

Speaking to taxpayers in Latin America, it is clear that discontent is one emotion that dominates their feeling towards a region that is not afraid to diverge from standard practices, and where distrust between taxpayers and tax authorities often abounds.

Brazil has long been an example of a country where international taxation norms do not apply. This continues to be the case, with transfer pricing rules and R&D provisions, among others, governed by unique sets of principles not seen elsewhere.

This, of course, means that innovative solutions are required to successfully navigate the tax landscape. And Brazil is by no means alone in this regard.

Brazil is also not alone in seeing rising rates of investment. According to UN statistics, foreign direct investment to South America increased by 12% in the past year.

But while this clearly shows that many countries in the region have successfully attracted increased levels of investment and trade, which has in turn positively impacted economic growth, this is often achieved in spite of the tax system rather than because of it.

Jeffrey Owens, former OECD tax chief, acknowledged this recently when he said that while tax is never the main driver of an investment decision, it can sometimes be a barrier. He referenced Brazil (along with India) as an example of where this can be seen.

However, with Brazil set to host the two biggest global events on the sporting calendar – the FIFA World Cup in 2014 and the Summer Olympics in 2016 – it would not be surprising if tax policy is used to attract the necessary levels of investment to ensure the success of these showpiece events. The Minister of Finance has already said increasing investment rates, particularly in infrastructure, is a government priority. We know the Brazilian authorities are not shy when it comes to changing tax laws and provisions (in the past 24 years there have been around 4 million new tax rules), but perhaps they would be better served in focusing on consistent policies and providing certainty for taxpayers.

It is against this backdrop that International Tax Review publishes the 10th edition of its Latin America Guide in association with leading tax advisers: Deloitte, EY and Munoz, Manzo y Ocampo.

The supplement also contains exclusive interviews with a number of taxpayers, in which they outline the tax challenges faced by companies operating in Brazil, including insights regarding what the biggest taxpayer concerns are at present, what their relationships with the tax authorities are like, and why they want a greater focus on simplicity and certainty.

Matthew Gilleard

Corporate Tax editor

International Tax Review

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The firm demonstrated its sweet spot of litigation with an international twist with the recent win for the Danish tax authority…but it’s not a tax case
The recently formed firm has taken a break from hiring EY talent to expand its transactional tax and tax technology capabilities
The AI platform, founded last year by two school friends, is partnering with challenger firms like Unity Advisory and A&M Tax to launch its own assault on the AI tax market
Not only has Aurtus received recognition from ITR in the past, but its founder was both a partner at KPMG and co-founder of Dhruva Advisors
Clients care more about considered counsel than rapid media-friendly soundbites, says Matthew Gilleard, associate director at Infinite
It was also a memorable night for Galicia, KPMG, Skadden and Pinheiro Neto, all of which scooped major awards at a gala ceremony in New York
The former Deloitte UK CEO earned a 45% raise in a year when 1,000 staff reportedly lost their jobs – and the pay gap is only getting bigger
In a seminal development for big law, the 95-year-old firm is set to cease operations after a series of high-profile partner departures
UK Chancellor John Healey extended a VAT cut, suspended tariffs, increased a bank surcharge and vowed to increase funding for HMRC
Kristine Riisberg warned that TP decisions can determine top-up tax exposure under pillar two, while global consensus over the rules remains unsettled
Gift this article