Canada: Proposed legislative amendments to foreign affiliate dumping rules

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada: Proposed legislative amendments to foreign affiliate dumping rules

wong-sabrina.jpg

dezfuli-atbin.jpg

Sabrina Wong and Atbin Dezfuli, Blake Cassels & Graydon

On August 16 2013, the government of Canada introduced draft legislative proposals (August 16 proposals) to amend its foreign affiliate (FA) dumping rules. The measures may be introduced into Parliament as early as autumn 2013.

The FA dumping rules generally apply where a corporation resident in Canada (CRIC) controlled by a non-resident corporation (parent) makes an investment in a corporation that is or becomes an FA of the CRIC. Where CRIC gives non-share consideration for acquiring the investment, a deemed dividend to its parent can be triggered that will be subject to Canadian withholding tax, except to the extent it reduces the CRIC's paid-up capital (PUC offset rule). Where the CRIC gives its shares as consideration, the PUC of such shares are deemed to be nil.

The August 16 proposals contain changes to the FA dumping rules generally of a relieving nature, including:

  • Limiting the application of the FA dumping rules where a CRIC makes an investment in an FA before CRIC becomes controlled by the parent;

  • Making the application of the PUC offset rule completely automatic and significantly amending the scope of the dividend substitution election (the QSC election) that allows other Canadian members of the corporate group to be treated as having paid the dividend;

  • Extending the application of the rule that reinstates previously reduced PUC in certain circumstances (the PUC reinstatement rule), including expanding the types of FA investments to which the rule could apply; and

  • Broadening the rules which except certain amalgamations of taxable Canadian corporations from the FA dumping rules.

However, the August 16 proposals also include amendments aimed at preventing taxpayers from using certain relieving provisions to avoid the application of the FA dumping rules.

The impact of the rules and the proposed changes should be carefully considered by any foreign investor planning an acquisition of, or investment in, any Canadian company with foreign operations.

Sabrina Wong (sabrina.wong@blakes.com) and Atbin Dezfuli (atbin.dezfuli@blakes.com)

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Tel: +1 416 863 2400 and Fax: +1 416 863 2653

Website:www.blakes.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
In a post on X, Scott Bessent urged dissenting countries to the US/OECD side-by-side arrangement to ‘join the consensus’ to get a deal over the line
A new transatlantic firm under the name of Winston Taylor is expected to go live in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers and 20 offices
As ITR’s exclusive data uncovers in-house dissatisfaction with case management, advisers cite Italy’s arcane tax rules
The new guidance is not meant to reflect a substantial change to UK law, but the requirement that tax advice is ‘likely to be correct’ imposes unrealistic expectations
Gift this article