Argentina: Government changes black-list approach to tax havens
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Argentina: Government changes black-list approach to tax havens

edelstein.jpg

rodriguez.jpg

Andrés Edelstein


Ignacio Rodríguez

On May 30 2013, the Argentine government issued Decree 589/2013 that eliminates the list of no-or-low tax jurisdictions included in the income tax regulations, the so-called black-list. The decree empowers the federal tax authorities to establish a new white dynamic list which will only include the countries, jurisdictions, territories and tax regimes that will be considered as cooperatives for fiscal transparency purposes, namely those that have signed double tax treaties or tax information exchange agreements with Argentina, to the extent that the exchange of information has been effective.

In 2000, Argentine income tax regulations introduced a black-list of countries, consisting of jurisdictions considered to have no-or-low tax regimes. Transactions with those countries are deemed as not being performed on an arm's-length basis for transfer pricing purposes and thus, are subject to annual analysis and support in light of these regulations.

In accordance with Decree 589/2013, any reference made in tax law and regulations to tax havens now refers to jurisdictions that do not qualify as effective co-operators according to the tax authorities' definition.

Moreover, a jurisdiction will no longer be characterised as cooperative if a treaty or a tax information exchange agreement (TIEA) is terminated, and/or the exchange of information is not effectively accomplished.

Although the jurisdictions that have double tax treaties and TIEAs in force with Argentina will initially be considered as cooperative, those that have initiated negotiations to sign a TIEA or a double tax treaty with a broad clause for the exchange of information may also be considered as such.

For these purposes, the treaties have to comply, to the furthest extent possible, with the international standards adopted by the OECD's Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes, establishing that no internal rules can be invoked to allege banking, trading or any other secrecy whenever Argentina requests information.

As well as affecting the transfer pricing regulations, the changes introduced by Decree 589/2013 have a significant effect on other regulations. Indeed, Argentina's controlled foreign corporation rules are tied to this list.

It has to be considered at the time of defining, for instance:

  • Whether foreign source passive income has to be reported by local taxpayers for income tax purposes on an accrual or cash basis;

  • Whether taxes effectively paid abroad by second-tier subsidiaries are available to be computed as foreign tax credits; or

  • Whether foreign dividends distributed by an intermediate holding company that, in turn, owns an Argentine subsidiary have to be included or not in the income tax basis.

Also, amounts charged by those black-listed (now non-cooperative) jurisdictions involving Argentine source income are only deductible for the local taxpayer when they are paid.

Moreover, interest paid stemming from loans granted by foreign banking or financial entities is subject to an effective withholding income tax of 15.05%.

To achieve such a reduced rate the law requires, among other things, that these entities are not located in a no-or-low tax jurisdiction or that they are located in jurisdictions that have signed a TIEA with Argentina. Otherwise, interest paid abroad is subject to a 35% effective withholding income tax rate.

Also, in 2003, Argentina amended the tax procedural law to include a provision that, unless there is proof to the contrary, considers that funds transferred from tax havens or black-listed jurisdictions have to be treated as unreported income for income tax, valued added tax and excise tax purposes.

Decree 589/2013 rules will become applicable from the date on which the tax authorities release the new list of jurisdictions considered to be cooperatives for fiscal transparency purposes. This new list is not yet available.

Foreign investors doing business in Argentina should closely monitor the issuance of the new list by the Argentine tax authorities and its subsequent updates, as changes are likely to take place in relation to the now withdrawn black-list.

Also, it remains to be seen how this new approach is implemented with respect to certain practical matters such as whether the cooperative condition has to be met when a given agreement is signed, when the transaction is performed and/or when the payment is made, or when a jurisdiction ceases to be considered cooperative, and it is removed from the list when this change is effectively applicable, considering that income tax is an annual tax.

Lastly, this new approach will clearly affect certain existing structures as well as future planning for multinationals involving Argentina, as companies may have to consider situations in which a given jurisdiction may come to be considered as non-cooperative.

Andrés Edelstein (andres.m.edelstein@ar.pwc.com) and Ignacio Rodríguez (ignacio.e.x.rodriguez@us.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +54 11 4850 4651

Website: www.pwc.com/ar

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Burrowes had initially been parachuted into the role last summer to navigate the fallout from the firm’s tax leaks scandal
Barbara Voskamp is bullish on hiring local talent to boost DLA Piper’s Singapore practice, and argues that ‘big four’ accountants suffer from a stifled creativity
Chris Jordan also said that nations have a duty to scrutinise the partnership structures of major firms, while, in other news, a number of tax teams expanded their benches
KPMG has exclusive access to the tool for three years in the UK, giving it an edge over ‘big four’ rivals
But the US tax agency’s advice is consistent with OECD guidance and shouldn’t surprise anyone, other experts tell ITR
A survey of more than 25,000 in-house counsel reveals that diversity initiatives are a high priority when choosing external counsel
The report is aimed at helping 'low-capacity countries', the OECD has claimed
The UK tax agency appears to be going after easier, lower value targets, one lawyer has claimed
Criminal experts have told ITR that the case of Ulf Johannemann emphasises the fine line between tax avoidance and tax evasion
The ATO workers were among nearly 57,000 people who were duped into claiming fake GST refunds, while Kuwait signed a double taxation treaty with the UAE
Gift this article