FYR Macedonia: Tax treatment of interest income

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

FYR Macedonia: Tax treatment of interest income

kostovska.jpg

Elena Kostovska

The FYR Macedonian government considers any interest income arising from loans as regular income, but there are specific points in relation to the interest rate worth surveying in detail, which are often neglected by taxpayers. In terms of loans between related entities (including physical persons who are capital shareholders in a resident company), the legislation has a specific perspective on the acceptable interest rates. For example, a loan extended by a resident legal entity to a physical person – shareholder or founder – can be defined to give rise to a specific annual interest rate but an average interest rate available from commercial banks in the country will also be taken into consideration and will impact the tax base for the entity extending the loan. Specifically, if a loan is granted from a legal entity to a shareholder (physical person) at a rate lower than that used by commercial banks, the difference in the interest income the entity would have generated if using the interest rate of the commercial banks and the income that the entity has in fact generated by using the lower rate is considered as "hidden revenue" and has the same treatment as an unrecognised expense, therefore effectively raising the year-end tax base for corporate income tax purposes.

By the same token, resident companies receiving loans from related entities (including physical persons) at an interest rate higher than those available at commercial banks actually increase their tax base for corporate income tax by the amount equal to the difference in interest paid at the higher rate and interest that would have been paid if the loan agreement was under interest conditions available in banks.

Furthermore, interest paid on the basis of a loan granted from shareholders or founders who own at least 25% of the capital in the company and are in amount that is more than or equal to three times the capital participation of the loan grantor (for example a loan in amount of €1 million ($1.4 million) or more from a shareholder who has invested €333,333 in the entity) are considered as unrecognized expense for tax purposes. This provision, however, is not applicable in the first three years of the company's operation.

Yet another interest-related aspect that changes the tax base for corporate income tax is interest payments for loans received and used for purposes not related to the main business activity of the loan recipient. Interest paid for such loans is considered an unrecognised expense for tax purposes and thus increases the tax base. The same applies for interest paid on loans used for the purchase of furniture, artwork and decorative objects.

Elena Kostovska (elena.kostovska@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global, Skopje Office

Tel: +389 2 2400225

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on EMEA’s top performers in the first of three regional analyses
Firms are spending serious money to expand their tax advisory practices internationally – this proves that the tax practice is no mere sideshow
The controversial deal would ‘preserve the gains achieved under pillar two’, the OECD said; in other news, HMRC outlined its approach to dealing with ‘harmful’ tax advisers
Former EY and Deloitte tax specialists will staff the new operation, which provides the firm with new offices in Tokyo and Osaka
TP is a growing priority for West and Central African tax authorities, writes Winnie Maliko, but enforcement remains inconsistent, and data limitations persist
The UK tax agency has appointed six independent industry specialists to the panel
The two tax partners have significant experience and expertise in transactional and tax structuring matters
Gift this article