Details of European Commission’s FTT announced
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Details of European Commission’s FTT announced

eu-logosmall.jpg

The European Commission’s financial transaction tax (FTT) has been on the horizon for more than a year, but the details have finally emerged.

As previously announced, the FTT, which will apply in the 11 member states looking to adopt it on January 1 next year, will place a tax of 0.1% for shares and bonds and 0.01% for derivatives.

However, because the FTT will only apply in a limited zone instead of across the whole EU, the Commission has worked to make it more robust, providing legal clarity and a general anti-abuse rule.

An issuance principle has been added, meaning that financial instruments issued in the 11 member states will be taxed when traded, even if those trading them are not established within the FTT-zone.

"With today’s proposal, everything is in place to enable a common Financial Transaction Tax to be become a reality in the EU,” said Algirdas Semeta, Commissioner for taxation, customs union, audit and anti-fraud. “On the table is an unquestionably fair and technically sound tax, which will strengthen our single market and temper irresponsible trading”.

Despite not achieving unanimous adoption, the FTT will still affect financial institutions in non-participating member states if they are conducting transactions into or out of the FTT zone.

“We shouldn’t underestimate the geographical reach of the proposed EU FTT,” said David Newton, global financial services tax leader at PwC. “This tax will affect financial and non-financial institutions outside of the EU and not just those in the 11 countries who have already signed up for the enhanced cooperation procedure.”

Dan Neidle of Clifford Chance says that while the FTT is aimed at banks, most of the burden will in fact fall on pension funds, unit trusts and investors.

"First, it's highly extra-territorial,” he said. “Pension funds, unit trusts and other financial institutions in the UK and beyond will be subject to the tax whenever they trade with a party in the FTT zone, or if their transaction is cleared through the FTT zone. Given the interconnection of modern financial markets, the impact on investors in the UK and worldwide will be profound.”

“Second, unlike stamp duty, the tax cascades – it applies separately to each leg of a financial transaction,” he added. “For example, when a pension fund buys a corporate bond it will often clear through brokers and other institutions in the FTT zone. The way the FTT applies means that each element of the clearing process will be separately taxed. So whilst the headline rate of the FTT is 0.1%, the effective rate in many cases will be closer to 1%. It's not clear whether this is understood or intended.”

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Despite the relief, Brazil’s government has also presented a bill which seeks to re-impose a tax burden on companies’ payroll, one local tax specialist told ITR
Jeremy Brown arrives at the firm after a near 16-year career with Deloitte
PwC could elect a woman into the senior leadership position for the first time; in other news, KPMG Australia has extended its CEO’s term
The Senate report into PwC’s scandal is titled ‘The cover up worsens the crime’
Law firms that are conscious of their role in society are more likely to win work, according to a survey of over 23,000 in-house professionals
The firm’s tax business generated a quarter of HLB’s overall revenues in 2023
While successful pillar two implementation will require collaboration across all units, a combination of internal and external tax advice is at the centre of the effort
Binance has also been accused of manipulating foreign exchange rates via currency speculation and rate-fixing
Six individuals should have raised questions over information they received but did not breach professional standards, according to the firm
The partnership of KPMG UK has installed Holt for a second term as CEO and senior partner; in other news, a Baker McKenzie partner has sued the IRS
Gift this article