The Australian Taxation Office’s (ATO) response to the High Court’s judgment in the Mills case, where the taxpayer escaped the general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR), shows an acceptance the ruling is not limited to tier one capital raising by banks. The response could also help taxpayers outlining GAAR defences in future litigation.
Unlock this content.
The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.
HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
The case sits within a context of Brazil signalling that it is replacing informal discretion and ambiguity with structures that reward analytical rigour, one expert tells ITR
Jeff Soar lifts the lid on WTS UK’s ambitious recruitment plans, the firm's positioning against the big four, and why tax is the perfect profession for AI