All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Switzerland: Switzerland’s proposed Corporate Tax Reform III – transfer pricing impacts



Hans Rudolf Habermacher

Anja Klein

The proposed abolishment of the Swiss holding, mixed and domiciliary company tax regimes within the next five to seven years and the planned introduction of replacement tax measures (for example, the licence box and notional interest deduction) known as the "Swiss Corporate Tax Reform III" has recently sparked some discussions regarding its impact on corporate taxation. It should not be forgotten, though, that this reform will also have significant impacts on transfer pricing arrangements: many MNEs conducting business in Switzerland operate under said tax regimes and from a transfer pricing perspective their abolishment may entail a revision of the underlying business model and transfer pricing set-up to ensure MNEs continue to benefit from favourable taxation levels in Switzerland. The proposed tax reform may require taxpayers to pay more attention to their transfer pricing arrangements. This, however, may provide valid opportunities for companies to optimise their intercompany structures in such a way that they make maximum use of the new structuring possibilities. If implemented, an IP box tax exemption may allow existing companies to significantly reduce the tax rate on royalty income received from foreign affiliated companies or alternatively, a separate licence box company could be created to benefit from such an exemption.

Similarly, the notional interest deduction on equity as currently suggested would be an effective way to reduce a holding company's or mixed company's taxable income in case of a strong equity base. Thus, the new tax reform will allow taxpayers to implement attractive structures through valid transfer pricing, if aligned to the transfer pricing guidelines, as alternatives to the existing preferential Swiss tax regimes.

Hans Rudolf Habermacher (

Tel: +41 58 279 6327
Anja Klein (

Tel: +41 58 279 7245


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Energy ministers agreed on regulations including a windfall tax on fossil fuel companies to address high gas prices at an extraordinary Council meeting on September 30.
The European Parliament raises concerns over unanimity in voting on pillar two, while protests break out over tax reform in Colombia.
Ramesh Khaitan speaks to reporter Siqalane Taho about tax morality, transfer pricing regulations, Indian tax developments, and the OECD’s two-pillar solution.
Join ITR and KPMG China at 10am BST on October 19 as they discuss the personal, employment, and corporate tax-related implications of employees working from overseas.
Tricentis and Boehringer Ingelheim, along with a European Commission TP specialist, criticised the complexity of pillar one rules and their scope at an ITR event.
Speakers at ITR’s Managing Tax Disputes Summit said taxpayers can still face lengthy TP audits, despite strong documentation preparation
Gig economy companies in New Zealand will need to fully account and become liable for the goods and services tax of underlying suppliers on their platforms, under new proposals.
Join ITR and Thomson Reuters at 2pm (UAE) / 11am (UK) on October 13 as they discuss how businesses can prepare for Tax Administration 3.0 and future-proof against changes such as e-invoicing and increasing digitisation.
ITR has partnered with global TP leaders from Deloitte to discuss transfer pricing controversy around the globe, and to share advice on how to navigate an increasingly uncertain and risky TP landscape.
Sources say they are not satisfied with pillar one protections in the marketing and distribution safe harbour, even though it was designed to give businesses greater tax certainty.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree