All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

How to prepare for a eurozone breakup

euro.jpg

Multinationals operating in Europe would be foolish not to consider the treasury and tax implications of a country exiting the single currency, and conduct some impact assessments to help ensure the best outcomes for the business if such a situation does arise.

euro.jpg

 Nobody really wants to see the dissolution of the eurozone, mostly because of fears it would have a knock-on effect of creating another global recession, but repeated bailouts of vulnerable eurozone members by countries whose economies themselves are struggling to grow, is not a sustainable model.

Even if we disregard fears of a full-scale eurozone break-up, nobody can say with any certainty that vulnerable jurisdictions such as Greece, Portugal, Italy and Spain will remain in the eurozone much longer.

If an at-risk jurisdiction exits the eurozone, it is likely the exit would lead to a redenomination of the country’s currency, and significant devaluation of that currency against the euro.

This eventuality would throw up all kinds of gain and loss realisations for multinationals operating in such a jurisdiction, not to mention the dangers of local banking systems freezing up during the currency transition period.

A lot of the actions companies would need to take to prepare or respond are primarily treasury orientated.

However, most of these actions would have a knock-on impact on tax. And it is important companies consider such consequences now, so they can achieve the best tax result when difficult decisions have to be taken.

Redenomination of currencies in potential eurozone exit countries could lead to existing hedges becoming ineffective.

For instance, if a company is borrowing euros to hedge assets, but those assets subsequently become non-euro assets, then that poses problems.

Multinational treasurers may well consider adjusting the hedging profile of their groups in response to these risks. And the tax director must ensure these hedges work in terms of post-tax outcomes.

So tax directors should work closely with treasury when adjusting hedges to prevent big losses in individual jurisdictions where it could be difficult to obtain effective tax relief.

It is also important for tax directors to understand what types of contracts they have with potential exit jurisdictions.

For instance, potential problems with VAT could arise where a eurozone company supplies goods to an entity in a country which exits the euro.

If VAT is payable to tax authorities in the eurozone country, but the exit country’s currency is devalued, then as a result of the devaluation, the VAT paid to the seller will be reduced where the sales contract is governed by exit country law.

In most cross-border agreements, the governing law will be provided for in a specific clause, and companies should check whether changing this to a different jurisdiction will give a better tax result.

Similarly, loan contracts should be examined.

Loans from a company in a non-eurozone (or stable eurozone) country to a company in a potential exit country could be exposed to risk.

If a loan contract is denominated in euros, but is subsequently re-denominated into a new local currency following the exit country leaving the eurozone, in accordance with the governing law of the contract, the amount repayable to the lender company could be substantially devalued.

Characterisation of this loss is then important, for instance in the UK an impairment loss on contracts with related parties is not generally tax deductible but an exchange loss should be.

From a treasury perspective, it makes sense to extract cash from vulnerable eurozone countries, shifting it to accounts in the UK or the Netherlands for instance, to ensure that if a country’s banking system were to freeze for a period following a eurozone exit, the group would still have access to the money.

However, this could create a lot of short-term cross-border intra-group financing which raises tax issues that must also be considered.

Tax might not be the primary consideration if companies are reacting to a eurozone break-up, but if comparable options become available, then companies would be wise to conduct assessments now, so they know which choice would produce the best tax outcome possible.

See the May issue of International Tax Review for a full analysis of the tax planning implications of a eurozone break-up.

FURTHER READING:

Fools rush in where Angela should fear to tread

Ditch Europe, choose Asia

Transfer pricing precautions you need to take if the euro breaks up

More from across our site

The Cypriot government is set to increase tax certainty and make Cyprus more attractive to foreign investment after finally passing TP legislation aligned with OECD standards.
Amazon, Cisco, and Microsoft’s largest investors are lobbying for the GRI tax transparency standard, but this could be the start of a trend in shareholder activism.
Companies are waiting for the Canada Revenue Agency to provide more guidance on TP following the Cameco case, particularly over the issue of recharacterisation.
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted firms, teams and practitioners – winners will be announced on August 25
Multinational enterprises run the risk of hefty penalties if the company in question fails to register for VAT when providing electronic services in South Africa.
Tax directors have urged companies to ensure they have robust tax risk management controls when outsourcing tax functions.
Japan reports a windfall from all types of taxes after the government revised its stimulus package. This could lead to greater corporate tax incentives for businesses.
Sources at Netflix, the European Commission and elsewhere consider the impact of incoming legislation to regulate tax advice in the EU – if it ever comes to pass.
This week European Commission officials consider legal loopholes to secure minimum corporate taxation, while Cisco and Microsoft shareholders call for tax transparency.
The fast-food company’s tax settlement with French authorities strengthens the need for businesses to review their TP arrangements and documentation.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree