International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

COMMENT: Why Indian taxpayers need to be patient during a busy 2012


Rumours of delays in the implementation of India's Direct Taxes Code (DTC) and goods and service tax (GST) should be welcomed by taxpayers.

While there has been no formal announcement confirming that both of these changes will not be effective on April 1 2012, you would be hard pushed to find an Indian tax professional prepared to bet that this target will be met.

So why are these delays good news? Surely, having certainty and being given ample time to prepare for change is vital for business operations?

But what needs to be realised is that the reason for the holdup is that the government is not happy with the laws and are not prepared to let them loose on the public.

The DTC and GST have already been delayed a number of times and so this would suggest that there are still more problems to overcome.

At the end of 2011, International Tax Review organised and attended Indian tax conferences where these two topics dominated discussions. Delegates argued about the challenges of preparing for change. This is a fair argument. How many countries would drastically alter their direct and indirect tax laws at the same time, to take effect on the same day, and expect everything to go smoothly?

Matching these arguments were professionals eager for the government to listen to their concerns and implement them rather than rush in an imperfect law that will lead to increased litigation and higher levels of uncertainty – something that would do little to improve India's image to investors around the world.

The only solution, and this may not be popular with taxpayers, is to sit tight and carry on business as usual. Speculation as to why things have been delayed and the growing anger pointed towards the government will not help speed things along and will damage the image India portrays to the wider world as a place to do business.

The image of India's tax system to the rest of the world is the focus of this month's cover story of India Quarterly. While the future of the DTC and GST is still unknown, India still attracts high levels of foreign investment in all sectors. But with numerous tax obstacles to navigate around, the feature offers some practical guidance as to how a company looking to direct resources to India can avoid the tax pitfalls of foreign investment.


COVER STORY: How to successfully invest into India

INSIGHT: What to expect in next month's budgetANALYSIS: How India’s increased OECD cooperation will increase taxpayer scrutiny

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.
Caroline Setliffe and Ben Shem-Tov of Eversheds Sutherland give an overview of the US transfer pricing penalty regime and UK diverted profits tax considerations for multinational companies.
The result follows what EY said was one of the most successful years in the firm’s history.