COMMENT: Why Indian taxpayers need to be patient during a busy 2012

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


COMMENT: Why Indian taxpayers need to be patient during a busy 2012

india-flag.jpg

Rumours of delays in the implementation of India's Direct Taxes Code (DTC) and goods and service tax (GST) should be welcomed by taxpayers.

While there has been no formal announcement confirming that both of these changes will not be effective on April 1 2012, you would be hard pushed to find an Indian tax professional prepared to bet that this target will be met.

So why are these delays good news? Surely, having certainty and being given ample time to prepare for change is vital for business operations?

But what needs to be realised is that the reason for the holdup is that the government is not happy with the laws and are not prepared to let them loose on the public.

The DTC and GST have already been delayed a number of times and so this would suggest that there are still more problems to overcome.

At the end of 2011, International Tax Review organised and attended Indian tax conferences where these two topics dominated discussions. Delegates argued about the challenges of preparing for change. This is a fair argument. How many countries would drastically alter their direct and indirect tax laws at the same time, to take effect on the same day, and expect everything to go smoothly?

Matching these arguments were professionals eager for the government to listen to their concerns and implement them rather than rush in an imperfect law that will lead to increased litigation and higher levels of uncertainty – something that would do little to improve India's image to investors around the world.

The only solution, and this may not be popular with taxpayers, is to sit tight and carry on business as usual. Speculation as to why things have been delayed and the growing anger pointed towards the government will not help speed things along and will damage the image India portrays to the wider world as a place to do business.

The image of India's tax system to the rest of the world is the focus of this month's cover story of India Quarterly. While the future of the DTC and GST is still unknown, India still attracts high levels of foreign investment in all sectors. But with numerous tax obstacles to navigate around, the feature offers some practical guidance as to how a company looking to direct resources to India can avoid the tax pitfalls of foreign investment.

FURTHER READING:


COVER STORY: How to successfully invest into India

INSIGHT: What to expect in next month's budget

ANALYSIS: How India’s increased OECD cooperation will increase taxpayer scrutiny



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The recently formed firm has taken a break from hiring EY talent to expand its transactional tax and tax technology capabilities
The AI platform, founded last year by two school friends, is partnering with challenger firms like Unity Advisory and A&M Tax to launch its own assault on the AI tax market
Not only has Aurtus received recognition from ITR in the past, but its founder was both a partner at KPMG and co-founder of Dhruva Advisors
Clients care more about considered counsel than rapid media-friendly soundbites, says Matthew Gilleard, associate director at Infinite
It was also a memorable night for Galicia, KPMG, Skadden and Pinheiro Neto, all of which scooped major awards at a gala ceremony in New York
The former Deloitte UK CEO earned a 45% raise in a year when 1,000 staff reportedly lost their jobs – and the pay gap is only getting bigger
In a seminal development for big law, the 95-year-old firm is set to cease operations after a series of high-profile partner departures
UK Chancellor John Healey extended a VAT cut, suspended tariffs, increased a bank surcharge and vowed to increase funding for HMRC
Kristine Riisberg warned that TP decisions can determine top-up tax exposure under pillar two, while global consensus over the rules remains unsettled
Both Germany’s NIS2 and the EU AI Act now determine whether a tax function can meet its obligations – and both can make management personally accountable
Gift this article