International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Draft GAAR guidelines provide mixed cheer for Indian investors


The good news for taxpayers in the draft guidelines for the implementation of general anti-avoidance rules (GAAR) in India is that the measures will not be retrospective when they take effect from April 1 next year.

The guidelines also propose that the GAAR should only apply to the part of an arrangement that is deemed to be an impermissible avoidance arrangement and not the whole transaction.

However the committee responsible for the guidelines rejected representations from two groups of foreign institutional investors concerning what types of transactions the GAAR should apply to and the introduction of a new flat tax on gains.

The guidelines, which came out today, were drawn up by a group set up in February that was charged with producing recommendations to implement the GAAR provisions and a circular to ensure that they are not applied indiscriminately in every case.

The seven-person committeemade three proposals for inclusion in the guidelines:

  • A monetary threshold for the GAAR to be invoked, that is, the tax benefit of the arrangement should be above a figure that the committee did not specify. This would avoid the indiscriminate application of the GAAR and provide relief to smaller taxpayers.

  • Prescribed statutory forms, which would help to ensure natural justice and transparency. These forms would be for the assessing officer to make a reference to the commissioner; for the commissioner to make a reference to the Approving Panel and for the commissioner to return the reference to the assessing officer.

  • Time limits, which would promote absolute certainty:

    • the commissioner of income tax would have 60 days from the receipt of the objection from the assessee to make a reference to the Approving Panel;

    • if the commissioner of income tax decided to accept the assessee's objection and deemed that the GAAR do not apply, he would also have 60 days to communicate this to the assessing officer; and

    • the commissioner of income tax would not be able to take action if more than six months had passed from the time they received the reference.

The committee made three recommendations on the establishment of the Approving Panel, including that, in the beginning, there should be only one, which should be full-time and be in Delhi, and should consist of two members at the level of chief commissioner of income tax and the other should be an officer of the level of joint secretary or above from the Ministry of Law.

Position of foreign investors

On special provisions for foreign institutional investors, the committee said it had meetings with the Asia Securities Industry & Financial Markets Association and Capital Markets Tax Committee of Asia. These groups had recommended that capital markets transactions should be exempt from the GAAR and that a new flat tax on FII's gains that would not distinguish between any transactions should be introduced. However, neither of these was permitted under the Income Tax Act, the committee said.


The committee was more positive about a third recommendation from the two FII groups that centred on clarification of each provision of the GAAR. It recommended that where an FII decided to subject itself to the domestic law and not take any benefits of a tax treaty between India and another jurisdiction, the GAAR should not apply. But they should apply to the FII, but not to its non-resident investors, if it

decides to take the treaty benefit.

The committee also recommended that where a specific anti-avoidance rule is applicable, the GAAR should be not employed, but there could still be a need to use it if a specific rule was unable to deal with "an exceptional case of abusive behaviour".

The guidelines include 21 examples of situations that highlight questions about whether the GAAR should apply.

After the release of the guidelines, the Ministry of Financeissued another statement to say that they had been released for discussion only and that prime minister Manmohan Singh, who also took on the finance minister's role this week, had yet to see them. He will take the final decision on the guidelines after receiving further feedback.

The draft GAAR guidelines will also be discussed at International Tax Review's third annual India Tax Forum in Delhi on September 5 & 6.

Confirmed speakers include: RN Dash, ex-Director General of Income Tax (International Taxation), Government of India; Girish Srivastava, ex-Director General of Income Tax (International Taxation), Government of India; Mohan Parasaran, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India and Additional Solicitor General of India; Prashant Bhatnagar, head of India tax, Procter & Gamble; and R Mani, head of India tax, Tata

The foremost Indian tax specialists will tackle this issue and more. It is a unique opportunity to hear their views, increase your understanding of the upcoming changes and how best to prepare for the future.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The controversial measure is being watered down after criticism from the European Central Bank.
More than 600 such requests were made in 2022, while HMRC has also bolstered its fraud service, it has been revealed.
The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.