International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

South Africa: Re-characterisation of tax exempt dividends as taxable income

dachs.jpg

Peter Dachs, ENS Taxand

The Taxation Laws Amendment Bill 2012 is expected to be promulgated this year. Various changes are proposed to, among others, section 8E of the Income Tax Act, which deems tax-exempt dividends on certain shares and, in particular, preference shares to be taxable income in the hands of the shareholder. To avoid the re-characterisation of dividends as income in the hands of the shareholder it is important:

  • that there is no obligation on the issuer of the shares to redeem the shares within three years; and

  • that there is no option of the shareholder to redeem the shares within three years.

It is also necessary to ensure that the shares are not secured by a financial instrument and are also not subject to an arrangement in terms of which a financial instrument may not be disposed of by the issuer. It should therefore be ensured that there is no negative pledge in relation to any financial instrument held by the issuer.

Even if the relevant triggers are met, the dividends will still not be re-characterised as taxable income provided the shares are issued by the issuer for the purpose of acquiring equity shares in an operating company.

In terms of the new section 8EA, any dividend received by or accrued to a person during any year of assessment in respect of a share must be deemed in relation to that person to be an amount of income (and not a tax exempt dividend) if that share constitutes a "third-party backed share" at any time during that year of assessment.

A "third-party backed share" is defined in section 8EA(1) as any share in respect of which an enforcement right is exercisable or an enforcement obligation is enforceable as a result of any amount of any specified dividend or return of capital attributable to that share not being received by or accruing to the person holding the share.

An "enforcement obligation" is defined in section 8EA(1) as, in relation to a share, any obligation, whether fixed or contingent, of any person other than the issuer of the share to:

(i) acquire the share from the holder of that share;

(ii) make any payment in respect of that share in terms of a guarantee, indemnity or similar arrangement; or

(iii) procure, facilitate or assist with any acquisition or the making of any payment contemplated in (i) or (ii) above.

An "enforcement right" has similar wording to the concept of an "enforcement obligation".

In terms of the proviso to the definition of a "third-party backed share", where the purpose of the issuer in issuing the preference shares is to acquire equity shares in an operating company, then the re-characterisation of dividends as taxable income does not take place. This is provided that the enforcement right or enforcement obligation may be exercised against any company that forms part of the same group of companies as the issuer and operating company respectively.

It can therefore be seen that there are fairly complex rules relating to the re-characterisation of tax exempt dividend income to taxable income in respect of certain shares. These rules apply in respect of existing shares and therefore it should be ensured that, at the relevant effective dates, the above-mentioned triggers are not in place in respect of all such shares.

Peter Dachs (pdachs@ens.co.za)

ENS Taxand

Tel: +27 21 410 2500

Fax: +27 21 410 2555

Website: www.ens.co.za

Return to the BRICS tax cooperation special focus

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.
Industry groups are concerned about the shift away from the ALP towards formulary apportionment as part of a common consolidated corporate tax base across the EU.
The former tax official in Italy will take up her post in April.
With marked economic disruption matched by a frenetic rate of regulatory upheaval, ITR partnered with Asia’s leading legal minds to navigate the continent’s growing complexity.
Lawmakers seem more reticent than ever to make ambitious tax proposals since the disastrous ‘mini-budget’ last September, but the country needs serious change.
The panel, the only one dedicated to tax at the World Economic Forum, comprised government ministers and other officials.
Colombian Finance Minister José Antonio Ocampo announced preparations for a Latin American tax summit, while the potentially ‘dangerous’ Inflation Reduction Act has come under fire.
The OECD’s two-pillar solution may increase global tax revenue gains by more than $200 billion a year, but pillar one is the key to such gains due to its fundamental changes to taxing rights.