All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

India’s SK Mishra promises uniformity to bring taxpayer certainty


INDIA TAX FORUM: Stressing on the importance of a "non-adversarial" approach promised by India’s new finance minister, SK Mishra, (Joint Secretary, Foreign Tax Division & Competent Authority) acknowledged the growing tax litigation in India and promised a “uniformity in approach" among tax officials as one of the ways to bring about certainty for taxpayers.

Delivering a keynote address at International Tax Review’s India Tax Forum last week, Mishra outlined a dozen controversies in international taxation and transfer pricing and urged industry associations and professionals to provide inputs for possible solutions.


Transfer pricing disputes

Some of the key areas highlighted by Mishra in transfer pricing included determination of margins of the tested party (such as pass-through costs), non-availability of comparables and comparability issues, limitations on application of methods to emerging complex business transactions, risk adjustments, location savings, intangibles and financial transactions.

Risk adjustments

Specifically, on the issue of risk adjustments in transfer pricing, Mishra stated "risk is the by-product of functions and assets" and commented that there is an over-emphasis on the risk concept which is not warranted. He also stated that “risk adjustments” have become more of a routine adjustment in the transfer pricing reports filed with the tax department. But, in the absence of uniform standards/guidance, even competent authorities across the world are reluctant in allowing risk adjustments, Mishra clarified.

Intangibles and location savings

Elaborating on the disputes over intangibles, he expressed serious concerns on the absence of robust documentation to justify nature of "routine" IP development in India.

He stated that only “high-technology-driven IP” is given emphasis in transfer pricing, whereas detailed examination of other valuable IP created by businesses is not carried out. To buttress his argument, he cited the recent Apple-Samsung IP dispute relating to “shape” of a device as against the technology per se.

On the issue of location savings (which has impact on outsourcing to India), Mishra referred to a recent US court ruling attributing the savings to source country.

APA and safe harbour

Mishra expressed optimism about the new APA regime in India especially given the experience of the Indian competent authority in settling more than 100 transfer pricing related disputes through the mutual agreement procedure (MAP). "APA will be easy once MAP is concluded", said Mishra. He said that more than 140 MAP disputes have been settled by India in the last two years and majority of them were with the US. He also added that in only a couple of cases, the resolution failed.

Mishra however expressed doubts on effectiveness of the proposed safe harbour guidelines in India. He explained that the acceptance of a safe harbour range to the treaty partner will be crucial to avoid double taxation.

India and OECD

Mishra strongly defended India's reservations on OECD's commentary citing that OECD was not a body of experts but comprised of representatives of governments. "How can the view of 34 developed countries override the views of the Indian government?" questioned Mishra.

He advised that the government's reservation on certain portions of OECD commentary are already provided and one should consider these comments before taking a decision on any tax issue.

Bridging the trust deficit between taxpayers and officials

Dinesh Kanabar, deputy CEO, KPMG, raised concerns over the uncertainty and especially “individual officer-driven” inconsistent conclusions in tax matters. "Where does this leave to the taxpayer?” asked Kanabar.

Responding, Mishra strongly advocated an active contribution from all stakeholders for settling disputes. He stated that based on the inputs received, a suitable advisory would be issued to ensure a "uniformity in approach" among the tax officials on similar issues.

Co-published with

More from across our site

Japan reports a windfall from all types of taxes after the government revised its stimulus package. This could lead to greater corporate tax incentives for businesses.
Sources at Netflix, the European Commission and elsewhere consider the impact of incoming legislation to regulate tax advice in the EU – if it ever comes to pass.
This week European Commission officials consider legal loopholes to secure minimum corporate taxation, while Cisco and Microsoft shareholders call for tax transparency.
The fast-food company’s tax settlement with French authorities strengthens the need for businesses to review their TP arrangements and documentation.
The full ALP model will be adopted through a new TP regime, which is set to boost the country’s investments and tax certainty.
Tax professionals have called on the UK government to reconsider its online sales tax as it would affect the economy at the worst time.
Tax professionals have called on companies to act urgently to meet e-invoicing compliance targets as the EU plans to ramp up digitisation.
In the wake of India’s ambitious 25-year plan for economic growth, ITR has partnered with leading tax commentators to discuss what the future will look like for India and for the rest of the world.
But experts cast doubt on HMRC's data and believe COVID-19 would have increased the revenue shortfall.
EY’s plan to separate its auditing and consulting businesses might lessen scrutiny from global regulators, but the brand identity could suffer, say sources.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree