Harmonisation of Brazilian interstate VAT rates involving imported goods

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Harmonisation of Brazilian interstate VAT rates involving imported goods

taxessmall.jpg

Federal Resolution 13, published on April 26 2012 and in force as of January 1 2013, unifies the Brazilian State VAT (ICMS) interstate rate applicable for imported goods, when those goods are part of interstate transactions, reports Elson Bueno of KPMG.

At the moment, there are various rates applicable on interstate transactions:

  • 7% applicable on sales made by business based in the south or south-east regions to customers in the north, north-east and mid-west regions, as well as to Espírito Santo state.

  • 12% applicable on:

    • Sales from any region to the customers in south or south-east regions; and

    • Sales from north, north-east, mid-west regions and Espírito Santo State to customers in north, north-east, mid-west regions and Espírito Santo state.

Under Federal Resolution 13, these rates were unified into one single rate of 4% for interstate transactions involving imported goods, regardless of the origin and destination in Brazil.

However the unified 4% ICMS rate will be applicable only in the following situations:

  • If the imported goods are not subject to any kind of industrial process after customs clearance; and

  • If the manufactured product resulting from the assembling or manufacturing process has more than 40% of imported good or raw materials. This 40% ratio of imported content should be verified by the tax authorities, according to specific procedures to be further regulated by the National Council of Fiscal Policy (CONFAZ).

The unified ICMS rate will not be applicable to transactions involving:

  • Imported goods with no national equivalent, according to guidance to be provided by the Council of Foreign Commerce Representatives (CAMEX);

  • Imported goods purchased by companies located and benefiting from the Manaus Free Trade Zone regional tax incentives (Basic Productive Process);

  • Goods covered by other listed tax incentives (for example digital TV manufacturing, electronics and IT); and

  • Natural gas originated from foreign sources.

The aim of this new rule is to reduce or tackle the harmful tax competition among Brazilian states, known as the tax war of ports. Because some Brazilian states, such as Espírito Santo and Santa Catarina, granted ICMS tax incentive on imports, the effective ICMS rate on imports sometimes reached 3 to 4%, despite ICMS interstate rates (of 7% or 12%) and the mandatory CONFAZ pre-approval necessary for state incentives. Moreover, this measure intends to create a more competitive price for domestic products against imported products.

Considering this tax environment, many Brazilian ICMS taxpayers structured their operations and supply chains to take advantage of ICMS reductions on imports. This involved channeling imports into Brazil through trading companies located in states where ICMS benefits were granted.

Even though the legality and constitutionally of such ICMS import incentives have been discussed by Brazilian judicial courts for many years, the unified ICMS rate of 4% will harmonise the harmful situation of tax competition.

Elson Bueno

KPMG in Brazil

Tel: +55 1121833281

Email: ebueno@kpmg.com.br

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
Gift this article