All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

India’s Chidambaram to reconsider Vodafone retroactive tax amendments

chidambaram2.jpg

India’s new finance minister, Palaniappan Chidambaram, has moved to increase taxpayer confidence by ordering a review of the recently proposed retroactive tax law amendments.

Chidambaram told reporters at his first media briefing since taking over as finance minister on August 1 that his predecessor’s plans to target Vodafone-style transactions dating back to 1961 may not see the light of day. “It is true that the economy is challenged by a number of factors but it is also true that with sound policies, good governance and effective implementation, we would be able to overcome these challenges,” said Chidambaram.

chidambaram.jpg

The decision to introduce retroactive amendments followed the government’s January Supreme Court defeat in the much-discussed Vodafone case.

The case related to Vodafone’s 2007 purchase of a 67% stake in Hong Kong-based Hutchison’s Indian cellular unit.

Despite winning the case and avoiding a $2.5 billion tax bill, Vodafone will still be liable for tax if the amendment is passed. This prompted criticism of the government as many felt this disrespected the authority of the Supreme Court.

Chidambaram, who has twice before held the post of finance minister, said the amendment needed to be reviewed for fear of dissuading foreign investment.

“Since investment is an act of faith, we must remove any apprehension or distrust in the minds of investors,” said Chidambaram. “Clarity in tax laws, a stable tax regime, a non-adversarial tax administration, a fair mechanism for dispute resolution and an independent judiciary will provide great assurance to investors.”

This approach is quite the opposite of his predecessor, Pranab Mukherjee, who told parliament before he resigned that: “India cannot become a no-tax country... a tax haven. There cannot be a situation where somebody will make money on an asset located in India and will not pay tax either in India or the country of its origin.”

While Mukherjee denied that his comments were disrespectful or confrontational, his approach was criticised by many.

The proposed retrospective amendments will be discussed at International Tax Review's third annual India Tax Forum in Delhi on September 5 & 6.

Confirmed speakers include:

  • SK Mishra, Joint Secretary (Foreign Tax Division) and Competent Authority of India, Ministry of Finance;

  • Promila Bhardwaj, Director General of Income Tax (International Taxation & Transfer Pricing), Government of India;

  • Kamlesh Varshney, CIT (APA), Income Tax Department, Government of India

  • RN Dash, ex-Director General of Income Tax (International Taxation), Government of India;

  • Girish Srivastava, ex-Director General of Income Tax (International Taxation), Government of India;

  • Mohan Parasaran, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India and Additional Solicitor General of India;

  • Prashant Bhatnagar, head of India tax, Procter & Gamble;

  • R Mani, head of India tax, Tata;

  • Ketan Madia, vice president, taxes, GE; and

  • Bela Seth Mao, head of India tax, Shell.

India’s foremost tax specialists will tackle this issue and more. It is a unique opportunity to hear their views, increase your understanding of the upcoming changes and learn how best to prepare for the future.



more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The European Parliament raises concerns over unanimity in voting on pillar two, while protests break out over tax reform in Colombia.
Ramesh Khaitan speaks to reporter Siqalane Taho about tax morality, transfer pricing regulations, Indian tax developments, and the OECD’s two-pillar solution.
Join ITR and KPMG China at 10am BST on October 19 as they discuss the personal, employment, and corporate tax-related implications of employees working from overseas.
Tricentis and Boehringer Ingelheim, along with a European Commission TP specialist, criticised the complexity of pillar one rules and their scope at an ITR event.
Speakers at ITR’s Managing Tax Disputes Summit said taxpayers can still face lengthy TP audits, despite strong documentation preparation
Gig economy companies in New Zealand will need to fully account and become liable for the goods and services tax of underlying suppliers on their platforms, under new proposals.
Join ITR and Thomson Reuters at 2pm (UAE) / 11am (UK) on October 13 as they discuss how businesses can prepare for Tax Administration 3.0 and future-proof against changes such as e-invoicing and increasing digitisation.
ITR has partnered with global TP leaders from Deloitte to discuss transfer pricing controversy around the globe, and to share advice on how to navigate an increasingly uncertain and risky TP landscape.
Sources say they are not satisfied with pillar one protections in the marketing and distribution safe harbour, even though it was designed to give businesses greater tax certainty.
Political support for qualified majority voting is at a peak as unanimity rules continue to block the European Council from passing a directive on pillar two.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree