India’s Chidambaram to reconsider Vodafone retroactive tax amendments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India’s Chidambaram to reconsider Vodafone retroactive tax amendments

chidambaram2.jpg

India’s new finance minister, Palaniappan Chidambaram, has moved to increase taxpayer confidence by ordering a review of the recently proposed retroactive tax law amendments.

Chidambaram told reporters at his first media briefing since taking over as finance minister on August 1 that his predecessor’s plans to target Vodafone-style transactions dating back to 1961 may not see the light of day. “It is true that the economy is challenged by a number of factors but it is also true that with sound policies, good governance and effective implementation, we would be able to overcome these challenges,” said Chidambaram.

chidambaram.jpg

The decision to introduce retroactive amendments followed the government’s January Supreme Court defeat in the much-discussed Vodafone case.

The case related to Vodafone’s 2007 purchase of a 67% stake in Hong Kong-based Hutchison’s Indian cellular unit.

Despite winning the case and avoiding a $2.5 billion tax bill, Vodafone will still be liable for tax if the amendment is passed. This prompted criticism of the government as many felt this disrespected the authority of the Supreme Court.

Chidambaram, who has twice before held the post of finance minister, said the amendment needed to be reviewed for fear of dissuading foreign investment.

“Since investment is an act of faith, we must remove any apprehension or distrust in the minds of investors,” said Chidambaram. “Clarity in tax laws, a stable tax regime, a non-adversarial tax administration, a fair mechanism for dispute resolution and an independent judiciary will provide great assurance to investors.”

This approach is quite the opposite of his predecessor, Pranab Mukherjee, who told parliament before he resigned that: “India cannot become a no-tax country... a tax haven. There cannot be a situation where somebody will make money on an asset located in India and will not pay tax either in India or the country of its origin.”

While Mukherjee denied that his comments were disrespectful or confrontational, his approach was criticised by many.

The proposed retrospective amendments will be discussed at International Tax Review's third annual India Tax Forum in Delhi on September 5 & 6.

Confirmed speakers include:

  • SK Mishra, Joint Secretary (Foreign Tax Division) and Competent Authority of India, Ministry of Finance;

  • Promila Bhardwaj, Director General of Income Tax (International Taxation & Transfer Pricing), Government of India;

  • Kamlesh Varshney, CIT (APA), Income Tax Department, Government of India

  • RN Dash, ex-Director General of Income Tax (International Taxation), Government of India;

  • Girish Srivastava, ex-Director General of Income Tax (International Taxation), Government of India;

  • Mohan Parasaran, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India and Additional Solicitor General of India;

  • Prashant Bhatnagar, head of India tax, Procter & Gamble;

  • R Mani, head of India tax, Tata;

  • Ketan Madia, vice president, taxes, GE; and

  • Bela Seth Mao, head of India tax, Shell.

India’s foremost tax specialists will tackle this issue and more. It is a unique opportunity to hear their views, increase your understanding of the upcoming changes and learn how best to prepare for the future.



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
Gift this article