Significant amendments to Canadian foreign affiliate rules

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Significant amendments to Canadian foreign affiliate rules

On August 19 2011, the Canadian Department of Finance released a package of proposed amendments including significant changes to the tax rules governing the taxation of income earned by foreign affiliates of Canadian taxpayers (the proposals).

van-loan.jpg
jones.jpg

Chris Van Loan

Josh Jones

One of the more significant changes included in the proposals is a new rule which could give rise to an income inclusion for a Canadian taxpayer where a foreign affiliate has made an upstream loan that remains in existence for two years or more. Canadian taxpayers will have until August 19 2013 to deal with existing structures affected by this new rule.

Another significant change is the introduction of a hybrid surplus pool which will encompass a foreign affiliate's gains and losses from the disposition of shares of foreign affiliates and certain other property. This rule is intended to eliminate the advantages gained by Canadian taxpayers from entering into certain transactions whereby shares of foreign affiliates are sold within a foreign affiliate group on a non-rollover basis to generate exempt surplus, which could be returned to Canada by way of tax-free dividends, but will have broader application.

Other changes included in the proposals include a new approach intended to simplify the characterisation of distributions from foreign affiliates and revisions to the rules governing acquisitions, dispositions and reorganisations of foreign affiliates.

These proposals represent the most significant package of amendments affecting foreign affiliates of Canadian taxpayers since 2004. Due to the introduction of some of these proposed amendments, a number of previously announced proposals are being abandoned. Since a number of amendments have retroactive application to transactions that occurred before August 19 2011, either on an automatic or elective basis, it is important that taxpayers review both current and past transactions to determine the impact of the proposals and whether any such elections should be made.

Chris Van Loan (chris.vanloan@blakes.com), partner, and Josh Jones (josh.jones@blakes.com), associate, Toronto

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Tel: +1 416 863 2400

Fax: +1 416 863-2653

Website: www.blakes.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Using tax to enhance its standing as a funds location is behind Luxembourg’s measures aimed at clarifying ATAD 2 and making its carried interest regime more attractive
Encompassing everything from international scandals to seismic political events, it’s a privilege to cover the intriguing world of tax
In his newly created role, current SSA commissioner Bisignano will oversee all day-to-day IRS operations; in other news, Ryan has made its second acquisition in two weeks
In the age of borderless commerce, money flows faster than regulation. While digital platforms cross oceans in milliseconds, tax authorities often lag. Indonesia has decided it can wait no longer
The tariffs are disrupting global supply chains and creating a lot of uncertainty, tax expert Miguel Medeiros told ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum
Corporate counsel should combine deep technical knowledge with strategic dynamism, says Agarwal, winner of ITR’s EMEA In-house Indirect Tax Leader of the Year award
Luxembourg’s reform agenda continues at pace in 2025, with targeted measures for start-ups and alternative investment funds
Veteran Elizabeth Arrendale will lead the new advisory practice, which will support clients with M&A tax structuring, post-deal integration, and more
MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Gift this article